Advertisement

Organizational Learning in Higher Education Institutions: Theories, Frameworks, and a Potential Research Agenda

  • Jay R. Dee
  • Liudvika Leišytė
Part of the Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research book series (HATR, volume 31)

Abstract

Organizational learning is a conceptually rich construct that can inform understandings of a wide range of organizational phenomena. The field of higher education, however, lacks a sufficient body of empirical research on organizational learning in colleges and universities. Moreover, the limited set of organizational learning publications in higher education is weighted heavily toward the functionalist paradigm. This lack of paradigm diversity can be problematic in terms of how the organizational learning construct is applied to practice. In the context of the corporatization of higher education, where the authority of central management has been strengthened, functionalist approaches to organizational learning can reinforce top-down power dynamics and exacerbate tensions between faculty and administrators. This chapter calls for higher education researchers not only to conduct more studies of organizational learning, but to do so from the vantage point of multiple research paradigms.

First, the chapter discusses how organizational learning is relevant to the unique contexts of higher education institutions. Second, the chapter examines the wide variety of definitions used in the organizational learning literature, and highlights some of the paradigm debates that have emerged among scholars in this field. Next, the chapter explains and critiques some of the prominent functionalist theories that have guided the study of organizational learning. To complement these long-standing functionalist perspectives, the chapter introduces several organizational learning theories that have emerged in other paradigms. Finally, the chapter concludes with a proposed research agenda for studying organizational learning in colleges and universities.

Keywords

Organizational learning Knowledge management Learning organization Organizational theory Research paradigms Higher education administration Communities of practice Social networks Emancipatory learning Organizational change Faculty development Accountability Knowledge acquisition Organizational memory Tacit knowledge Socialization Dialogue 

References

  1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akgun, A., Byrne, J., Lynn, G., & Keskin, H. (2007). Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alstete, J. (1995). Benchmarking in higher education. Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  5. Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Argyris, C. (1996). Unrecognized defenses of scholars: Impact on theory and research. Organization Science, 7(1), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  9. Balay, R. (2012). Effect of learning organization perception to organizational commitment: A comparison between private and public university. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 2474–2486.Google Scholar
  10. Balbastre, F., & Moreno-Luzon, M. (2003). Self-assessment application and learning in organizations: A special reference to the ontological dimension. Total Quality Management, 14(3), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Banta, T., & Palomba, C. (2015). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Bauman, G. (2005). Promoting organizational learning in higher education to achieve equity in educational outcomes. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education (New directions for higher education no. 131, pp. 25–35). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Beach, A., & Cox, M. (2009). The impact of faculty learning communities on teaching and learning. Learning Communities Journal, 1(1), 7–27.Google Scholar
  14. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  15. Benjamin, R., & Carroll, S. (1998). The implications of the changed environment for governance in higher education. In W. Tierney (Ed.), The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance (pp. 92–119). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bensimon, E. (2005). Closing the achievement gap in higher education: An organizational learning perspective. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education (New directions for higher education no. 131, pp. 99–111). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Bensimon, E., Polkinghorne, D., Bauman, G., & Vallejo, E. (2004). Doing research that makes a difference. Journal of Higher Education, 75(1), 104–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berends, H., & Lammers, I. (2010). Explaining discontinuity in organizational learning: A process analysis. Organization Studies, 31(8), 1045–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bernbom, G. (Ed.). (2001). Information alchemy: The art and science of knowledge management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Bess, J. (2006). Strategic ambiguity: Antidote to managerialism in academia. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 491–533). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bess, J., & Dee, J. (2008). Understanding college and university organization: Theories for effective policy and practice, volume II: Dynamics of the system. Sterling, VA: Stylus Press.Google Scholar
  23. Bess, J., & Dee, J. (2014). Bridging the divide between faculty and administration: A guide to understanding conflict in the academy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Birnbaum, R. (2001). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work, and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16, 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Borden, V., & Kezar, A. (2012). Institutional research and collaborative organizational learning. In R. Howard, G. McLaughlin, & W. Knight (Eds.), The handbook of institutional research (pp. 86–106). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bourgeois, L., & Eisenhardt, K. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Boyce, M. (2003). Organizational learning is essential to achieving and sustaining change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 28(2), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  31. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Bui, H., & Baruch, Y. (2012). Learning organizations in higher education: An empirical evaluation within an international context. Management Learning, 43(5), 515–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Burgoyne, J., & Jackson, B. (1997). The arena thesis: Management development as a pluralistic meeting point. In J. Burgoyne & M. Reynolds (Eds.), Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 54–70). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  35. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Caldwell, R. (2012a). Leadership and learning: A critical reexamination of Senge’s learning organization. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 25(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Caldwell, R. (2012b). Systems thinking, organizational change, and agency: A practice theory critique of Senge’s learning organization. Journal of Change Management, 12(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Casey, A. (2005). Enhancing individual and organizational learning: A sociological model. Management Learning, 36(2), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Chang, Y., Yang, P., & Chen, M. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(6), 936–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Clark, B. (1998). The entrepreneurial university. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization, 12, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Cohen, M., & March, J. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  45. Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Cook, S., & Yanow, D. (1993). Cultural and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Cook, S., & Yanow, D. (1996). Culture and organizational learning. In M. Cohen & L. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 430–459). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Coopey, J. (1995). The learning organization: Power, politics, and ideology. Management Learning, 26, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Coopey, J., & Burgoyne, J. (2000). Politics and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 869–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Cox, M. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. In M. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities (New directions for teaching and learning, no. 97, pp. 5–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Crossan, M., Lane, H., & White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.Google Scholar
  52. Crossan, M., Maurer, C., & White, R. (2011). Reflections on the 2009 AMR decade award: Do we have a theory of organizational learning? Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Daft, R., & Huber, G. (1987). How organizations learn: A communication framework. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 5(2), 1–36.Google Scholar
  55. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Daft, R., & Weick, K. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.Google Scholar
  57. Dee, J., & Daly, C. (2009). Innovative models for organizing faculty development programs: Pedagogical reflexivity, student learning empathy, and faculty agency. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 7(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  58. Deeg, R. (2005). Change from within: German and Italian finance in the 1990s. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 169–202). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of the UK universities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Dill, D. (1999). Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization. Higher Education, 38, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Dowd, A. (2005). Data don’t drive: Building a practitioner-driven culture of inquiry to assess community college performance (Research report). Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education.Google Scholar
  63. Dowd, A., & Tong, V. (2007). Accountability, assessment, and the scholarship of “best practice”. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 57–119). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Duderstadt, J. (2009). Aligning American higher education with a twenty-first century public agenda. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3), 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ellis, S., Margalit, D., & Segev, E. (2012). Effects of organizational learning mechanisms on organizational performance and shared mental models during planned change. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(2), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity: Expansive organizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38(3), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Epple, D., Argote, L., & Murphy, K. (1996). An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Operations Research, 44(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2), 198–233.Google Scholar
  71. Ewell, P. (1997, December). Organizing for learning: A new imperative. AAHE Bulletin, 50, 3–6.Google Scholar
  72. Fang, C., Lee, J., & Schilling, M. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21(3), 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Fenwick, T. (1998). Questioning the concept of the learning organization. In S. Scott, B. Spencer, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Learning for life: Canadian readings in adult education. Toronto, ON: Thompson.Google Scholar
  74. Fenwick, T. (2003). Emancipatory potential of action learning: A critical analysis. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(6), 619–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Fiol, C., & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.Google Scholar
  76. Flood, R., & Romm, N. (1996). Diversity management: Triple loop learning. Chicester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Foss, N., Lyngsie, J., & Zahra, S. (2013). The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1453–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Freed, J. (2001). Why become a learning organization? About Campus, 5(6), 16–21.Google Scholar
  79. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (trans: Bergman Tramos, M.). New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  80. Fulop, L., & Rifkin, W. (1997). Representing fear in learning in organizations. Management Learning, 28, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Galagan, P. (1997). Smart companies (knowledge management). Training and Development, 51(12), 20–25.Google Scholar
  82. Garratt, R. (1987). The learning organization. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  83. Garvin, D. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–84.Google Scholar
  84. Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Gioia, D., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiple perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602.Google Scholar
  86. Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  89. Hansen, M., & Nohria, N. (2004). How to build collaborative advantage. Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
  90. Hartley, M. (2003). “There is no way without a because”: Revitalization of purpose at three liberal arts colleges. Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Hatch, M. (1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (pp. 3–27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Hedberg, B., Nystrom, P., & Starbuck, W. (1977). Designing organizations to match tomorrow. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Prescriptive models of organizations (pp. 171–181). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  94. Heimans, J., & Timms, H. (2014). Understanding “new power”. Harvard Business Review, 92(12), 48–56.Google Scholar
  95. Holley, K. (2009). Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  96. Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ingvaldsen, J. (2015). Organizational learning: Bringing the forces of production back in. Organization Studies, 36(4), 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ireland, D., & Webb, J. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Iverson, S. (2007). Camouflaging power and privilege: A critical race analysis of university diversity policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Jeris, L. (1998). Intervening for transformation: An organizational learning perspective. ERIC Document, 420295.Google Scholar
  101. Karatas-Ozkan, M., & Murphy, W. (2010). Critical theorist, postmodernist, and social constructionist paradigms in organizational analysis: A paradigmatic review of organizational learning literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Kezar, A. (2005). What campuses need to know about organizational learning and the learning organization. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education (New directions for higher education no. 131, pp. 7–22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  103. Kezar, A. (2012). Bottom-up/top-down leadership: Contradiction or hidden phenomenon. Journal of Higher Education, 83(5), 725–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Kezar, A. (2014a). Higher education change and social networks: A review of research. Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kezar, A. (2014b). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  106. Kezar, A., & Elrod, S. (2012). Facilitating interdisciplinary learning: Lessons from project Kaleidoscope. Change, 44(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. Drori, J. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Lattuca, L. (2005). Faculty work as learning: Insights from theories of cognition. In E. Creamer & L. Lattuca (Eds.), Advancing faculty learning through interdisciplinary collaboration (New directions for teaching and learning no. 102, pp. 13–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  109. Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Lawrence, T., Mauws, M., Dyck, B., & Kleysen, R. (2005). The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4i framework. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Leifer, R., & Delbecq, A. (1978). Organizational/environmental interchange: A model of boundary spanning activity. Academy of Management Review, 3(1), 40–50.Google Scholar
  113. Leišytė, L., & Dee, J. (2012). Understanding academic work in a changing institutional environment: Faculty autonomy, productivity, and identity in Europe and the United States. In J. Smart & M. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 123–206). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Leišytė, L., & Enders, J. (2011, January). Understanding knowledge disclosure of life scientists: A question of contextual and organizational ambidexterity? Paper presented at the RESUP conference, Paris: Science Po.Google Scholar
  115. Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Levitt, B., & March, J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Lewis, M., & Moultrie, J. (2005). The organizational innovation laboratory. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Lieberman, D. (2005). Beyond faculty development: How centers for teaching and learning can become laboratories for learning. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education (New directions for higher education no 131, pp. 87–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  119. Lipshitz, R. (2000). Chic, mystique, and misconception: Argyris and Schön and the rhetoric of organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(4), 456–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Lounamaa, P., & March, J. (1987). Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Science, 33, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  123. Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Martin, R., Manning, K., & Ramaley, J. (2001). The self-study as a chariot for strategic change. In J. Ratcliff, E. Lubinescu, & M. Gaffney (Eds.), How accreditation influences assessment (New directions for higher education, no. 113, pp. 95–115). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  125. Milam, J. (2005). Organizational learning through knowledge workers and infomediaries. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education (New directions for higher education, no. 131, pp. 61–73). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  126. Miller, K., Pentland, B., & Choi, S. (2012). Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1536–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Miner, A., & Mezias, S. (1996). Ugly duckling no more: Pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organization Science, 7(1), 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  129. Museus, S., & Jayakumar, U. (Eds.). (2012). Creating campus cultures: Fostering success among racially diverse student populations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  130. Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organizations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a Multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 63–84). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.Google Scholar
  131. Neumann, A. (1995). Context, cognition, and culture: A case analysis of collegiate leadership and cultural change. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 251–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Neumann, A. (2005). Taking seriously the topic of learning in studies of faculty work and careers. In E. Creamer & L. Lattuca (Eds.), Advancing faculty learning through interdisciplinary collaboration (New directions for teaching and learning, No. 102, pp. 63–83). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  133. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.Google Scholar
  134. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  136. O’Banion, T. (1997). A learning college for the 21st century. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.Google Scholar
  137. O’Meara, K. (2005). The courage to be experimental: How one faculty learning community influenced faculty teaching careers, understanding of how students learn, and assessment. Journal of Faculty Development, 20(3), 153–160.Google Scholar
  138. O’Meara, K. (2007). Striving for what? Exploring the pursuit of prestige. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 121–179). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  139. O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.Google Scholar
  140. Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  141. Ortenblad, A. (2002). Organizational learning: A radical perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Ortenblad, A. (2009). Achieving organizational independence of employees’ knowledge using knowledge management, organizational learning, and the learning organization. In D. Jemielniak & J. Kociatkiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of research on knowledge-intensive organizations (pp. 229–242). New York: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Ortenblad, A., & Koris, R. (2014). Is the learning organization idea relevant to higher educational institutions? A literature review and a multi-stakeholder contingency approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(2), 173–214.Google Scholar
  144. Petrides, L. (2002). Organizational learning and the case for knowledge-based systems. In A. Serban & J. Luan (Eds.), Knowledge management: Building a competitive advantage in higher education (New directions in institutional research, no. 113, pp. 69–84). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  145. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  146. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  147. Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Mechanisms, culture, and feasibility. Management Learning, 31(2), 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Ramaley, J., & Holland, B. (2005). Modeling learning: The role of leaders. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education (New directions for higher education, no. 131, pp. 75–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  151. Rendón, L. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Rhoads, R., & Szelényi, K. (2011). Global citizenship and the university: Advancing social life and relations in an interdependent world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  153. Romme, A., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (1999). Circular organizing and triple loop learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(5), 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Sá, C. (2010). Redefining university roles in regional economies: A case study of university-industry relations and academic organization in nanotechnology. Higher Education, 61(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Schilling, J., & Kluge, A. (2009). Barriers to organizational learning: An integration of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Schroeder, C. (Ed.). (2011). Coming in from the margins: Faculty development’s emerging organizational development role in institutional change. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  157. Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. (1996). Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 529–557.Google Scholar
  158. Schuster, J., & Finkelstein, M. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  159. Senaratne, C., & Wang, C. (2009). Unpacking the organizational competence trap and developing a typology of opportunity exploration and exploitation. In J. Braet (Ed.), The proceedings of the 4th European conference on entrepreneurship and innovation. Reading, MA: Academic Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  160. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
  161. Senge, P. (2000). The academy as learning community: Contradiction in terms or realizable future? In A. Lucas (Ed.), Leading academic change: Essential roles for departmental chairs (pp. 275–300). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  162. Shipton, H. (2006). Cohesion or confusion? Towards a typology for organizational learning research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(4), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  164. Simon, H. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization: A volume in honor of Jacob Marschak (pp. 161–176). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  165. Simon, H. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  168. Smith, D., & Parker, S. (2005). Organizational learning: A tool for diversity and institutional effectiveness. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Organizational learning in higher education (New directions for higher education, no. 131, pp. 113–125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  169. Suk, J. (2012). Gender parity and state legitimacy: From public office to corporate boards. ICON, 10(2), 449–464.Google Scholar
  170. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Thomas, J., Clark, S., & Gioia, D. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Tierney, W. (2006). Trust and the public good: Examining the cultural conditions of academic work. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  173. Tierney, W., & Rhoads, R. (1994). Faculty socialization as cultural process: A mirror of institutional commitment (ASHE-ERIC higher education report, no. 93–6). Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  174. Tinto, V. (1997). Universities as learning organizations. About Campus, 1(6), 2–4.Google Scholar
  175. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of competition within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Tsoukas, H. (2011). How should we understand tacit knowledge? A phenomenological view. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed., pp. 453–476). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  177. Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). Evolution and revolution: Mastering the dynamics of innovation and change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Van der Spek, R., & Spijkervet, A. (1997). Knowledge management: Dealing intelligently with knowledge. In J. Liebowitz & L. Wilcox (Eds.), Knowledge management and its integrative elements (pp. 31–59). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  179. Vera, D., Crossan, M., & Apaydin, M. (2011). A framework for integrating organizational learning, knowledge, capabilities, and absorptive capacity. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed., pp. 153–180). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  180. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  182. Weick, K. (1991). The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  184. Weick, K., & Westley, F. (1996). Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 440–458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  185. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  186. Westerheijden, D., Epping, E., Faber, M., Leišytė, L., & Weert, E. (2013). Stakeholders and quality assurance. Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 4, 71–86.Google Scholar
  187. Willmott, H. (1997). Critical management learning. In J. Burgoyne & M. Reynolds (Eds.), Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 161–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Zhao, Z. (2005). Toward a multilevel knowledge transfer paradigm: Acquiring engineering capabilities in the Chinese automotive industry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  189. Zhao, Z., & Anand, J. (2013). Beyond boundary spanners: The collective bridge as an efficient inter-unit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1513–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Zietsma, C., Winn, M., Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. (2002). The war of the woods: Facilitators and impediments of organizational learning processes. British Journal of Management, 13, S61–S74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher EducationUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Higher Education Studies (ZHB)Technical University DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations