Abstract
Military intervention demands complex sets of goals that integrate the objectives of defeating hostile forces, political reforms within the host nation, civil society capacity building at the local level, and economic development distributed across the populace. These objectives are intended to promote stability and conflict resolution.
With a number of actors incorporated into civil-military operations, a lack of unity of effort springs from failure to reach common understanding of challenges and agreement on combined actions.
To achieve unity of effort, a civil-military team must possess shared goals and metrics. This is accomplished by creating organizational structure and decision making that avoids the inclination for inclusiveness at the cost of focused execution.
The structure and scope of civil-military operations is constrained by resources available and organizational needs to meet its goals and measure its success. Efforts must be tailored to fit the limitations of available resources.
While complex and difficult, civil-military operations are often the primary means by which the international community addresses internal conflicts. Field commander must understand that, while general principles for operations are generally strategic, there is discretion available to implement tactical solutions. Effective field commanders must understand the tenets of unity of effort, the institutional cultures of the partners, and the basic elements of successful organization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
TCAF is accessible at: http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/call/docs/10-41/app_a.asp
- 2.
References
Bader, H., Hanna, C., Douglas, C., & Fox, J. (2013). Illegal timber exploitation and counterinsurgency operations in Kunar Province, Afghanistan. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 32(4), 329–353.
Berman, E., Felter, J., Shapiro, J., & Callen, M. (2010). Insurgency and unemployment in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Philippines. Unpublished report from the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation for the US Department of Homeland Security, Grant# 2007-ST-061-000001.
De Coning, C. (2016). Civil-military interaction: Rationale, possibilities and limitations. In G. Lucius, & S. J. H. Rietjens (Eds.), Effective civil-military interaction in peace operations – Theory and practice. Berlin: Springer.
Frerks, G. (2016). Who are they? Encountering civilians. In G. Lucius, & S. J. H. Rietjens (Eds.), Effective civil-military interaction in peace operations – Theory and practice. Berlin: Springer.
Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. (2011). Earthquake relief in Haiti: Inter-organizational perspectives and lessons for the future. Accessible at http://hhi.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/In%20Line%20Images/programs%20-%20hum%20effectiveness%20-%20earthquake%20-%20exec%20summary.pdf
Kilcullen, D. J. (2005). Countering global insurgency. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(4), 597–617.
Kleinfeld, R., & Bader, H. (2014). Extreme violence and the rule of law: Lessons from Eastern Afghanistan. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Natsios, A. S. (2005, Autumn). The nine principles of reconstruction and development. Parameters, 35, 4–20.
Paul, C., Clarke, C. P., & Grill, B. (2010). Victory has a “Thousand Fathers”: Detailed counterinsurgency case studies (RAND National Defense Research Institute Report Contract W74V8H-06-C-0002[b]). Santa Monica: Rand.
Reese, T. R., & Wright, D. P. (2008). On point II: Transition to the new campaign: The United States Army in Operation Iraqi Freedom, May 2003–January 2005. Washington: Combat Studies Institute.
Rietjens, S. J. H., Bollen, M. T. I. B., Khalil, M., & Wahidi, S. F. (2009, Spring). Enhancing the footprint: Stakeholders in Afghan reconstruction. Parameters, 39(1), 22–39.
Rubinstein, R. A., Keller, D. M., & Scherger, M. E. (2008). Culture and interoperability in integrated missions. International Peacekeeping, 15(4), 540–555.
Scheltinga, T. A. M., Rietjens, S. J. H., de Boer, S. J., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005). Cultural conflict within civil-military cooperation: A case study in Bosnia. Low Intensity Conflict & Law Enforcement, 13(1), 54–69.
Shetler-Jones, P. (2016). Civil-military planning processes. In G. Lucius, & S. J. H. Rietjens (Eds.), Effective civil-military interaction in peace operations – Theory and practice. Berlin: Springer.
Stephenson, J. (2006a, March). Military-civilian cooperation – A field perspective. Foreign Service Journal, 83(3), 55–62.
Stephenson, J. (2006b). Provincial reconstruction teams – An interagency assessment. USAID. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADG252.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2014.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID). (2010). Development to counter insurgency. Accessible at: www.igcc.ucsd.edu/assets/001/501618.pdf
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation. (2012a). Conflict assessment framework 2.0. Theories and indicators of change- concepts and primers for conflict management and mitigation.
USAID Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation; and Guide to Drivers of Violent Extremism. (2012b). USAID Publication RAN-M-00-04-000490A-FY-05-63.
United States Government Integrated Civilian-Military Campaign Plan for Support to Afghanistan, signed by Ambassador Eickenberry and General Stanley McCrystal, August 10, 2009. www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/October_2009. Accessed 4 Aug 2014.
United States Institute of Peace. (2012). Guidelines for relations between armed forces and non-governmental humanitarian organizations in hostile or potentially hostile environments.
U.S. Department of State Cable, 07-08-2010. (2010). Civilian-military collaboration in the eastern zone: Activities of the natural resources counterinsurgency cell [UNCLASSIFIED]
U.S. Department of State National Foreign Affairs Training Center. (2009). Civilian culture in an interagency mission.
van Bemmel, I. E., Eikelboom, A. R., & Hoefsloot, P. G. F. (2010). Comprehensive and iterative planning in Uruzgan. Militaire Spectator, 179(4), 196–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Melkon, J., Embrey, J., Bader, H., Mennes, B. (2016). Civil-Military Interaction During Infantry Operations. In: Lucius, G., Rietjens, S. (eds) Effective Civil-Military Interaction in Peace Operations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26806-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26806-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26804-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26806-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)