Advertisement

Additional Knowledge Based MOF Architecture Layer for UML Models Generation Process

  • Ilona VeitaiteEmail author
  • Audrius Lopata
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 228)

Abstract

As organizations grow and IS get bigger it is needed to create accurate and complicated analyzes for developing systems. This analyzes are base for design of business models and system architecture. Designers every day face new challenges when they need to collide and understand other designers’ and analytics’ made models. This process creates new problems and mistakes. Automatization of IS engineering process lets create better and more qualified models with less mistakes. The article is about MOF architecture’s role in IS engineering process and about possibilities to improve MOF architecture’s composition with new knowledge based layer. The main scope of the article is to analyze improved MOF architecture’s usage in UML models generation with transformation algorithms from enterprise model process.

Keywords

MOF architecture Knowledge based IS engineering Enterprise model UML 

References

  1. 1.
    Butleris, R., Lopata, A., Ambraziunas, M., Veitaitė, I., Masteika, S.: SysML and UML models usage in knowledge based MDA process. Elektronika ir elektrotechnika. 21(2), 50–57 (2015). Print ISSN: 1392-1215, Online ISSN: 2029-5731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eichelberger, H., Eldogan, Y., Schmid, K.: A comprehensive analysis of UML tools, their capabilities and compliance. In: Software Systems Engineering, V.2.0. Universität Hildesheim (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jenney, J.: Modern methods of systems engineering: with an introduction to pattern and model based methods (2010). ISBN-13:978-1463777357Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perjons, E.: Model-driven process design. aligning value networks, enterprise goals, services and IT systems. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University. Sweden by US-AB, Stockholm (2011). ISBN 978-91-7447-249-3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freiberg, M., Baumeister, J., Puppe, F.: Interaction pattern categories — pragmatic engineering of knowledge-based systems. In: 6th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering (KESE6) Germany (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ulrich, W.M.: Information Systems Transformation: Architecture-Driven Modernization Case Studies. Morgan Kaufmann, Newcomb Amsterdam (2010). ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OMG MOF.: OMG Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification, Version 2.4.2, April 2014 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.4.2
  8. 8.
    Gudas, S.: Architecture of knowledge-based enterprise management systems: a control view. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics And Informatics, Orlando, Florida, USA, vol. III, p.161–266 (2009). ISBN -10: 1-9934272-61-2Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gudas, S.: Informacijos sistemų inžinerijos teorijos pagrindai, p. 384. Vilnius University (2012). ISBN 978-609-459-075-7Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lopata, A., Ambraziūnas, M., Gudas, S., Butleris, R.: The main principles of knowledge-based information systems engineering. Electron. Electr. Eng. 11(1(25)), 99–102 (2012). ISSN 2029-5731Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veitaite, I., Lopata, A., Gudas, S., Butleris, R.: CASE tool component – knowledge-based subsystem uml diagrams generation process. Transf. Bus. Econ. 13(2B(32B)), 676–696 (2014). ISSN: 1648 – 4460Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gudas, S., Lopata, A.: Žiniomis grindžiama sistemų inžinerija, Mokomoji medžiaga. Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty of Humanities (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    UML Diagrams: Diagrams characteristics (2015). www.uml-diagrams.org
  14. 14.
    OMG UML.: Unified Modeling Language version 2.5. Unified Modeling (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5/Beta2/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty of HumanitiesKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations