Service User: Coercion Concern



In this short chapter, I discuss coercive practice by calling on personal experiences of over 20 years being treated for manic depression to give a patients’ perspective. This is of course a biased and somewhat anecdotal view of coercion that focuses on negative aspects, but reflects a patient’s experience of these techniques. In the context of this book, it is hoped that this account of coercion provides an alternate view to what readers may have already gained from previous chapters. I utilise treatment experiences over my time as a patient to emphasise my arguments. The chapter aims to question the rational of using coercive methods and questions the benefit to a patient over time. After defining what I think coercion is, I conclude by questioning why it is used and if it is at all an effective way of treating people with a mental health condition.


Service User Mental Health Condition Challenging Behaviour Mental Health Setting Acute Mental Health 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Duxbury, J., Aiken, F., & Dale, C. (2011). Deaths in custody: The role of restraint. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 2, 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. (2015). Violence and aggression: Short-term management in mental health, health and community settings. NICE Guideline NG10.Google Scholar
  3. Paterson, B., & Duxbury, J. (2007). Restraint and the question of validity. Nursing Ethics, 14, 535–545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rubin, G. C. (2009). The happiness project. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections Reference Unit, National Infection ServicePublic Health EnglandLondonUK

Personalised recommendations