Skip to main content

Patient Experience of Coercive Measures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Use of Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatric Care

Abstract

Coercive situations are complicated and stressful for both the one being forced as well as the one forcing the other. Patients’ experiences of coercion have been studied since the end of the 1970s, and interest in this theme has increased since about 2000. It seems that involuntary treatment as a general concept is more accepted than individual, specific coercive measures, such as forced medication, seclusion or restraint, which patients usually deem unnecessary. Patients’ views on seclusion and restraint have been mostly but not always negative. For instance, patients have expressed seclusion- or restraint-related feelings of safety and security, protection, trust, helpfulness and a decrease of stimulation. Moreover, perceptions vary according to, for example, patients’ age and gender and their adaptation to the illness and treatment system. The importance of patients’ perspective and service user involvement in the development of services has been officially recognised. Indeed, taking patients’ experience into proper consideration is a matter of the services’ quality. In this chapter, we also discuss these future challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abma, T. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2006). Moral liberation on psychiatric nursing. Nursing Ethics, 13(5), 546–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amendment to the Mental Health Act, 1423/2001. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2001/20011423. Accessed 14 Oct 2014.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2003). Learning from each other: Success stories and ideas for reducing restraint/seclusion in behavioral health. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, N. C. (2005). Vulnerability to mental illnesses: Gender makes a difference, and so does providing good psychiatric care. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 211–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2008). National mental health seclusion and restraint project. http://www.health.gov.au/MHSC. Accessed 17 Dec 2012.

  • Bergk, J., Einsiedler, B., Flammer, E., & Steinert, T. (2011). A randomized controlled comparison of seclusion and mechanical restraint in inpatient setting. Psychiatric Services, 62(11), 1310–1317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, R. L., & McCoy, S. M. (1983). A study of patients’ attitudes toward placement in seclusion. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34(11), 1052–1054.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, L., Ross, J., Nijman, H., Muir-Cochrane, E., Noorthoorn, E., & Stewart, D. (2011). The scope for replacing seclusion with time out in acute inpatient psychiatry in England. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(4), 826–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, L., Van Der Merve, M., Nijman, H., Hamilton, B., Noorthoorn, E., Stewart, D., et al. (2010). The practice of seclusion and time out on English acute psychiatric wards: The city—128 study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 24, 275–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, L., van der Werf, B., Vokkolainen, A., MuirCochrane, E., Allan, T., & Alexander, J. (2007). International variation in containment measures for disturbed psychiatric inpatients: A comparative questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(5), 357–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., Yeeles, K., Molodynski, A., Nightingale, H., Vazquez-Montes, M., Sheehan, K., et al. (2011). Pressure to adhere to treatment (‘leverage’) in English mental healthcare. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 145–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, W.-T., Chan, C. W. H., Lam, L.-W., & Kam, C. W. (2005). Psychiatric inpatients’ perceptions of positive and negative aspects of physical restraint. Patient Education and Counselling, 59, 80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2000). White paper on the protection of the human rights and dignity of people suffering from mental disorder, especially those placed as involuntary patients in a psychiatric establishment. http://www.ijic.org/docs/psychiatry.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.

  • Duxbury, J. A. (2002). An evaluation of staff and patients’ views of and strategies employed to manage patient aggression and violence on one mental health unit. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9(3), 325–337. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2002.00497.x/pdf.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duxbury, J., & Whittington, R. (2005). Causes and management of patient aggression and violence: Staff and patient perspectives. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(5), 469–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Badri, S., & Mellsop, G. (2008). Patient and staff perspectives on the use of seclusion. Australasian Psychiatry, 16(4), 248–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, K. I., & Westrin, C. G. (1995). Coercive measures in psychiatric care. Reports and reactions of patients and other people involved. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 92(3), 225–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005, October 14). Green paper. Improving the mental health of the population: Towards a strategy on mental health for the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, com (2005)484. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/mental/green_paper/mental_gp_en.pdf

  • Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 peoples: Systematic review and meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 345, e4692.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frueh, B. C., Knapp, R. G., Cusack, K. J., Grubaugh, A. L., Sauvageot, J. A., Cousins, V. C., et al. (2005). Patients’ report of traumatic or harmful experiences within the psychiatric setting. Psychiatric Services, 56(9), 1123–1133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallop, R., McCay, E., Guha, M., & Khan, P. (1999). The experience of hospitalized and restraint of women who have a history of childhood sexual abuse. Health Care for Women International, 20, 401–416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin, C. J., Elsom, S. J., & Happell, B. (2007). Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 298–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Georgieva, I., Mulder, C. L., & Wierdsma, A. (2012). Patients’ preference and experience of forced medication and seclusion. Psychiatric Quarterly, 83, 1–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, K., McEvoy, J., Koral, H., & Schneider, N. (1989). Hospitalized schizophrenic patients’ views about seclusion. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 50, 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happell, B., & Koehn, S. (2011). Seclusion as a necessary intervention: The relationship between burnout, job satisfaction and therapeutic optimism and justification for the use of seclusion. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(6), 1222–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T., Lendemeijer, H. H. G. M., & Jansen, M. G. M. J. (2004). Seclusion: The inside story. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 11, 276–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, S., Lidz, C., Gardner, W., Mulvey, E., Eisenberg, M., Monahan, J., et al. (2004). The MacArthur coercion study. May 2004 Update of the Executive Summary. Available from www.macarthur.virginia.edu/coercion.html

  • Holmes, D., Kennedy, S. L., & Perron, A. (2004). The mentally ill and social exclusion: A critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient’s perceptive. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 25, 559–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hottinen, A., Välimäki, M., Keski-Valkama, A., Sailas, E., Putkonen, H., Joffe, G., et al. (2012). Adolescent in-patients’ views of mechanical restraint: A Finnish interview study. Psychiatria Fennica, 43, 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckshorn, K. A. (2004). Reducing seclusion and restraint use in mental health settings: Core strategies for prevention. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 42(9), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, S., Fulbrook, P., Fenton, K., & Kilshaw, M. (2009). A clinical improvement project to develop and implement a decision-making framework for the use of seclusion. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 18, 398–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, K. L., Høyer, G., & Sexton, H. C. (2007). Coercion and patient satisfaction on psychiatric acute wards. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 504–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, W., Noorthoorn, E., De Vries, W., Hutschemaekers, G., & Lendermeijer, B. (2008). The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(6), 463–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffs, L., Rose, D., MacRae, C., Maione, M., & Macmillan, K. M. (2012). What near misses tell us about risk and safety in mental health care. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 19(5), 430–437. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01812.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K., Bennett, L., Lancaster, L., O’Donoghue, D., & Carillo, F. (2002). Improving the nurse-patient relationship: A multi-faceted approach. EDTNA ERCA Journal, 28, 145–150. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6686.2002.tb00230.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day construction method. Science, 3, 1776–17780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsakou, C., & Priebe, S. (2006). Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission—A review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 114, 232–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. R., Williams, C. A., & Pesut, D. J. (1994). Hallucinatory experiences of psychiatric patients in seclusion. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 8(3), 169–176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keski-Valkama, A., Koivisto, A.-M., Eronen, M., & Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2010a). Forensic and general psychiatric patients’ view of seclusion: A comparison study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(3), 446–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keski-Valkama, A., Sailas, E., Eronen, M., Koivisto, A.-M., Lönnqvist, J., & Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2010b). The reasons for using restraint and seclusion: A nation-wide 15-year study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 64, 136–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellin, L., & Wallsten, T. (2010). Accumulated coercion and short-term outcome of inpatient psychiatric care. BMC Psychiatry, 10(53), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, K., & Hantikainen, V. (2002). Privacy of patients in the forensic department of a psychiatric clinic: A phenomenological study. Nursing Ethics, 9(4), 347–360. Retrieved from September 15, 2013, http://nej.sagepub.com/content/9/4/347.full.pdf.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kontio, R., Anttila, M., Lantta, T., Kauppi, K., Joffe, G., & Välimäki, M. (2014). Towards a safer working environment on psychiatric wards: Service users’ delayed perspectives of aggression and violence-related situations and development ideas. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 50(4), 271–279. Online 10 Jan 2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kontio, R., Joffe, G., Putkonen, H., Kuosmanen, L., Hane, K., & Välimäki, M. (2012). Seclusion and restraint in psychiatry: Patients’ experiences and practical suggestions on how to improve practices and use alternatives. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48, 16–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kontio, R., Välimäki, M., Putkonen, H., Kuosmanen, L., Scott, A., & Joffe, G. (2010). Patient restriction: Are there ethical alternatives to seclusion and restraint. Nursing Ethics, 17(1), 65–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, L. (2009). Personal liberty in psychiatric care—Towards service user involvement. Academic dissertation, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis D 841, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. ISBN:978-29-3839-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, L., Hätönen, H., Jyrkinen, A. R., Katajisto, J., & Välimäki, M. (2006). Patient satisfaction with psychiatric inpatient care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(6), 655–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, L., Hätönen, H., Malkavaara, H., Kylmä, J., & Välimäki, M. (2007). Deprivation of liberty in psychiatric hospitals: The patient’s perspective. Nursing Ethics, 14(5), 597–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larue, C., Dumais, A., Drapeau, A., Menard, G., & Goulet, M. (2010). Nursing practices recorded in reports of episodes of seclusion. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 31(12), 785–792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, L. S., Wise, T. N., & Shay, L. (1993). A prospective study of psychiatry patients’ attitudes toward the seclusion room experience. General Hospital Psychiatry, 15, 177–182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann-Poll, P. S., Smit, A., van Doeselaar, M., & Hutschemacker, G. J. M. (2013). Professionals’ attitudes after seclusion reduction program. Anything changed? Psychiatry Quarterly, 84(1), 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, P., Keet, N., Winkler, G., & Flisher, A. J. (2010). Mental health service users’ perceptions and experiences of sedation, seclusion and restraint. International Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, T., Bergen, H., & Fjeldsoe, K. (2004). Staff and patient perception of seclusion: Has anything changed? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47(1), 33–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, T., Vermeer, C., & Windsor, C. (2000). Patients’ perceptions of seclusion: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(2), 370–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalak, E. E., Yatham, L. N., Wan, D. D., & Lam, R. W. (2005). Perceived quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder. Does group psychoeducation have an impact? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(2), 95–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2009). Plan for mental health and substance abuse work. Proposals of the Mieli 2009 working group to develop mental health and substance abuse work until 2015. Reports of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 3. http://www.stm.fi/en/social_and_health_services/mentalhealth_substanceabuse. Accessed 20 Feb 2013.

  • National Institute for Health and Welfare. (2011). A Nordic network for reducing the use of coercion in care. www.thl.fi/fi_FI/web/fi/hanke?id. Accessed 29 Jan 2013.

  • Nawka, A., Kalisova, L., Rabpch, J., Giacco, D., Cihal, L., Onchev, G., et al. (2013). Gender differences in coerced patients with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 257. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, H., & Sands, N. (2010). Post-seclusion debriefing: A core nursing intervention. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 46(3), 221–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Howes, G., & Stanley, J. (2012). Prevalence of perceived coercion among psychiatric patients: Literature review and meta-regression modelling. The Psychiatrist, 36, 335–340. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.111.037358. http://pb.rcpsych.org/content/36/9/335.full.pdf+html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noda, T., Sygiyama, N., Sato, M., Ito, H., Sailas, E., Putkonen, H., Kontio, R., & Joffe, G. (2013). Influence of patient characteristic on duration of seclusion/restraint in acute psychiatric setting in Japan. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 67(6), 405–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkänen, A., Hätönen, H., Kollanen, M., Kuosmanen, L., & Välimäki, M. (2011). Nurses’ perceptions of nursing interventions supporting quality of life in acute psychiatric care. Perspectives in Psychiatry, 47(4), 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priebe, S., Katsakou, C., Amos, T., Leese, M., Morriss, R., & Rose, D. (2009). Patients’ views and readmissions a year after involuntary hospitalisation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raboch, J., Kalisova, L., Nawka, A., Kitzelerova, E., Onchev, G., Karastergiou, A., et al. (2010). Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: Findings from ten European countries. Psychiatric Services, 61(10), 1012–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ristner, M., Lisker, A., & Arbitman, M. (2011). Ten-year quality of life outcomes among patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders: I. Predictive value of disorder-related factors. Quality of Life Research, 21(5), 837–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., Crawford, M. J., & Fulop, N. (2004). Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science & Medicine, 58(10), 1973–1984. Retrieved from September 15, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00401-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., & Happell, B. (2009). Learning from experience: Using action research to discover consumer needs in post-seclusion debriefing. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 18, 100–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M. (2006). Gender issues in psychiatry. PsychiatryOnline. Focus, 4(1), 3–5. American Psychiatry Association.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., & Basu, D. (2010). Coercion in psychiatric care: Global and Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(3), 203–206. doi:10.4103/00195545.70971. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990818/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shattell, M. M., Andes, M., & Thomas, S. P. (2008). How patients and nurses experience the acute care psychiatric environment. Nursing Inquiry, 15(3), 242–250. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2008.00397.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibitz, I., Scheutz, A., Lakeman, R., Schrank, B., Schaffer, M., & Amering, M. (2011). Impact of coercive measures on life stories: Qualitative study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 239–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M., Davis, R. H., Bixler, E. O., Lin, H.-M., Altenor, A., Altenor, R. J., et al. (2005). Special section on seclusion and restraint: Pennsylvania State hospital system’s seclusion and restraint reduction program. Psychiatric Services, 56(9), 1115–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen, P., Putkonen, H., Joffe, G., Korkeila, J., Puukka, P., Pitkänen, A., et al. (2013a). Does seclusion or restraint affect psychiatric patients’ subjective quality of life at discharge? International Journal of Mental health System, 7(1), 28. doi:10.1186/1752-4458-7-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen, P., Putkonen, H., Joffe, G., Korkeila, J., & Välimäki, M. (2014). Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients’ perception of coercion: Systematic mixed methods review. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 162. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen, P., Välimäki, M., Noda, T., Puukka, P., Korkeila, J., Joffe, G., et al. (2013b). Secluded and restraint patients’ perceptions of their treatment. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 22, 47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soliday, S. M. (1985). A comparison of patient and staff attitudes toward seclusion. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173(5), 282–286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sørgaard, K. W. (2004). Patients’ perception of coercion in acute psychiatric wards. An intervention study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 58, 299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sørgaard, K. W. (2007). Satisfaction and coercion among voluntary, persuaded/pressured. Scand Journal of Caring Science, 61, 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spensley, J., Edwards, D. W., & White, E. (1980). Patient satisfaction and involuntary treatment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50(4), 725–727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srebnik, D. S., & Russo, J. (2007). Consistency of psychiatric crisis care with advanced directive instructions. Psychiatric Services, 58(9), 1157–1163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, T., Bergbauer, G., Schmid, P., & Gebhardt, R. P. (2007). Seclusion and restraint in patients with schizophrenia; clinical and biographical correlates. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(6), 492–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, R. C. (2011). ‘They all said you could come and speak to us’: Patients’ expectations and experiences of help on an acute psychiatric inpatient ward. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18(1), 74–80. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01645.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolker, J. J., Nijman, H. L. I., & Zwanikken, P.-H. (2006). Are patients’ views on seclusion associated with lack of privacy in the ward? Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 20(6), 282–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. W., McCrary, S. V., Swartz, M. S., Elbogen, E. B., & Dorn, V. (2006). Superseding psychiatric advance directives; ethical and legal consideration. Journal of American Academic Psychiatry and Law, 34(3), 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Hannon, M. J., Elbogen, E. B., Wagner, H. R., McCauley, B. J., et al. (2003). Psychiatric advance directives: A survey of persons with schizophrenia, family members, and treatment providers. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenkanen, H., Tiihonen, J., Repo-Tiihonen, E., & Kinnunen, J. (2011). Interrelationship between core interventions and core competencies of forensic psychiatric nursing in Finland. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 7, 32–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Välimäki, M. (1998). Psychiatric patients’ views on the concepts of self-determination: Findings from a descriptive study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7, 59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veltkamp, E., Nijman, H., Stolker, J. J., Frigge, K., Driers, P., & Bowers, L. (2008). Patients’ preferences for seclusion or forced medication in acute psychiatric emergency in the Netherlands. Psychiatric Services, 59(2), 209–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vruwink, F. J., Mulder, C. L., Northoorn, E. O., Uitenbroek, D., & Nijman, H. L. I. (2012). The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 231. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-12-231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wadeson, H., & Carpenter, W. T. (1976). Impact of the seclusion room experience. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 163(5), 318–328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten, T., Kjellin, L., & Lindström, L. (2006). Short-term outcome of inpatient psychiatric care-impact of coercion and treatments characteristics. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 975–980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, E., & Mason, T. (2006). Assessment of risk and special observation in mental health practice. A comparison of forensic and non-forensic settings. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 15, 235–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R., Bowers, L., Nolan, P., Simpson, A., & Neil, L. (2009). Approval ratings of inpatient coercive interventions in a national sample of mental health service users and staff in England. Psychiatric Services, 60(6), 792–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, R. (2005). Psychiatric inpatients’ experience with restraint. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(1), 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Päivi Soininen RN, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Soininen, P., Kontio, R., Joffe, G., Putkonen, H. (2016). Patient Experience of Coercive Measures. In: Völlm, B., Nedopil, N. (eds) The Use of Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatric Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26748-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26748-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26746-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26748-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics