Abstract
Rapid advances in technology have influenced the ways in which consumers experience live events, both in person and via television. One of the most prevalent of recent trends has been an increase in the use of “second screens,” or the simultaneous consumption of an event and use of an electronic device, such as a smartphone or tablet (Galily 2014). A recent study of US consumers found that 86 % said they participated in multitasking during television consumption, up from 72 % in 2011 (Deloitte 2014). Research has suggested that this trend is particularly pervasive among sport fans (Gantz and Lewis 2014). There are a number of entertainment options available to sports fans via such devices, including accessing statistical information about the event, viewing other camera angles, and participating with other fans on social media.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauder, D. (2014, April 23). NBC: Olympics show wide second-screen use. Associated Press, April 2. http://www.wintergames.ap.org/article/nbc-olympics-show-wide-second-screen-use
Boyle, R. (2014). Television sport in the age of screens and content. Television & New Media, Published online April 6, doi: 10.1177/1527476414529167.
Bruner, G. C., Hensel, P. J., & James, K. E. (1992). Marketing scales handbook: A compilation of multi-item measures. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
Cornwell, T. B., Weeks, C. S., & Roy, D. P. (2005). Sponsorship-linked marketing: Opening the black box. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 21–42.
Deloitte (2014, March 26). Digital omnivores craving more content across devices, according to Deloitte’s ‘Digital Democracy Survey.’ http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/Industries/media-entertainment/digital-democracy/index.htm
Funk, D. C., & James, J. (2001). The psychological continuum model: A conceptual framework for understanding an individual’s psychological connection to sport. Sport Management Review, 4(2), 119–150.
Galily, Y. (2014). When the medium becomes ‘well done’ sport, television, and technology in the twenty-first century. Television & New Media, Published online April 27, doi: 10.1177/1527476414532141.
Gantz, W., & Lewis, N. (2014). Sports on traditional and newer digital media: Is there really a fight for fans? Television & New Media, Published online April 8, doi: 10.1177/1527476414529463.
Grunert, K. G. (1996). Automatic and strategic processes in advertising effects. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 88–101.
Jensen, J. A., Walsh, P., Cobbs, J., & Turner, B. A. (2015). The effects of second screen use on sponsor brand awareness: A dual coding theory perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2549735
Keller, K. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–22.
Levin, A. M., Joiner, C., & Cameron, G. (2001). The impact of sports sponsorship on consumers’ brand attitudes and recall: The case of NASCAR fans. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 23, 23–31.
Mander, J. (2014, June 9). 91% of World Cup Fans are second-screeners. GlobalWebIndex, June 9. http://blog.globalwebindex.net/world-cup-second-screening
Olson, E. L., & Thjømøe, H. M. (2009). Sponsorship effect metric: Assessing the financial value of sponsoring by comparisons to television advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 504–515.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rahn, C. (2014, July 9). Germany thumping Brazil breaks Twitter record for sports. Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-09/germany-thumping-brazil-breaks-twitter-record-for-sports-matches.html
Rogers, S. (2014, July 14). Insights into the #WorldCup conversation on Twitter. https://blog.twitter.com/2014/insights-into-the-worldcup-conversation-on-twitter
Sneath, J. Z., Finney, R. Z., & Close, A. G. (2005). An IMC approach to event marketing: The effects of sponsorship and experience on customer attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(4), 373–381.
Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 226–238.
Tsuji, Y., Bennett, G., & Leigh, J. H. (2009). Investigating factors affecting brand awareness of virtual advertising. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 511–544.
Walsh, P., Kim, Y. J., & Ross, S. D. (2008). Brand recall and recognition: A comparison of television and sport video games as presentation modes. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 17, 201–208.
Wann, D. L. (2002). Preliminary validation of a measure for assessing identification as a sport fan: The Sport Fandom Questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Management, 3, 103–115.
Wiles, M. A., & Danielova, A. (2009). The worth of product placement in successful films: An event study analysis. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44–63.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jensen, J.A., Cobbs, J.B., Walsh, P., Turner, B.A. (2016). Investigating the Impact of Technology Use on the Efficacy of Broadcast Brand Integration. In: Kim, K. (eds) Celebrating America’s Pastimes: Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Marketing?. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26647-3_184
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26647-3_184
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26646-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26647-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)