Advertisement

Objectives

  • Souleymane Bado
  • Brian P. Forster
  • Abdelbagi M. A. Ghanim
  • Joanna Jankowicz-Cieslak
  • Günter Berthold
  • Liu Luxiang
Open Access
Chapter

Abstract

Salinity affects soil, water and crop plants. The severity of soil salinity needs to be determined in order to make informed decisions on best cropping practices. Likewise, the tolerance of crop cultivars needs to be matched to the growing conditions. Protocols are therefore required to monitor field salinity and to evaluate crop tolerance to salt.

Keywords

Salt Tolerance Soil Salinity Salinity Tolerance Rice Genotype Barley Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

2.1 Monitoring Field Salinity

Soil salinity affects both, water availability and plant growth processes. Salinity refers to the presence of one or more of a number of dissolved inorganic ions (Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, SO4 2−, HCO3−, NO3− and CO3 2−) in the soil. Monitoring of soil salinity and the preparation of soil salinity maps are essential objectives for good management of salt-affected lands and the productive agriculture of salt-tolerant crop cultivars.

2.2 Screening for Salt Tolerance

The aims are to provide a screen in which salt-tolerant rice, wheat and barley lines can be selected for use in plant breeding. The screen may also be used to compare and classify salt tolerance in a range of germplasm. Extensive tests have been carried out at the IAEA’s Plant Breeding and Genetics Laboratory (PBGL) using rice genotypes with known susceptibility/tolerance to saline field conditions. Correlations have been established between seedling hydroponics responses and field salinity tolerance. Thus, the seedling screen described here can be used to select plants that may be expected to perform well in saline field conditions.

2.3 Benefits and Drawbacks of Seedling Screening

The protocols described in this book use seedlings as the test materials. Tolerance to salt at the seedling stage has been correlated with field performance (Zeng et al. 2003) and in the test cases given in Chap.  4 (Tables  4.6,  4.7 and  4.8), and selection on the basis of plant survival at high salt concentrations has been proposed as a selection criterion for several crop species (Rush and Epstein 1976; Epstein and Norlyn 1977). However, seedling screening should be regarded as a prescreen, and candidate lines should always be validated by performance in saline field conditions. Flowering time is often considered as a salt-susceptible stage and is not considered in these protocols. However, the hydroponic system may be adapted to test plants throughout their life cycling including flowering and maturity stages. The benefits and drawbacks of hydroponics screening for salt tolerance are listed in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1

Benefits and drawbacks

Advantages

Drawbacks

• Cheap, fast and simple

• Clear classification into susceptible, moderate and tolerant types

• Tolerant seedlings may be recovered

• High-throughput screen

• Preselection technique for putative mutants

• Equipment is reusable

• Greater uniformity compared to soil-based salt tolerance screening

• Requires continual vigilance and maintenance (replenishment of test solution every 2 days)

• Solutions need to be changed; therefore, adequate stocks of chemicals are required

• Requires good-quality growing conditions

• Homogenous, good seed quality required

Seedling tests are best performed on M3 or advanced populations. Tests may be done on M2 populations which have the advantage of having relatively small population sizes, but there is a risk that the rare mutant line possessing salt tolerance is lost because of other factors, e.g. accidental miss-handling. M3 populations and above provide more rigour as there is a degree of replication for genotypes carrying the same mutant trait.

The salt tolerance tests described in this booklet are simple and monitor seedling responses; they do not involve deep physiological understanding of the physiological mechanisms involved. Physiological aspects of salt tolerance are covered in the following references:
  • Ashraf and Waheed (1990), Dewy (1962), Flowers (2004), Shannon (1985)—plant growth responses over the plant life cycle (germination to maturity)

  • Shannon (1985), Neumann (1997), Epstein et al. (1980)—criteria for measuring salt stress

  • Parida and Das (2005), Munns and Tester (2008)—effects on plants and mechanisms of salinity tolerance

References

  1. Ashraf M, Waheed A (1990) Screening of local/exotic accessions of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic) for salt tolerance at two growth stages. Plant Soil 128:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dewy DR (1962) Breeding crested wheatgrass for salt tolerance. Crop Sci 2:403–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Epstein E, Norlyn JD (1977) Seawater-based crop production: a feasibility study. Science 197:247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Epstein E, Norlyn JD, Rush DW, Kingsbury RW, Kelly DB, Cunningham GA, Wrona AF (1980) Saline culture of crops: a genetic approach. Science 210:399–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Flowers TJ (2004) Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 55:307–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Neumann P (1997) Salinity resistance and plant growth revisited. Plant Cell Environ 20:1193–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60:324–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rush DW, Epstein E (1976) Genotypic response to salinity: differences between salt sensitive and salt tolerant genotypes in the tomato. Plant Physiol 57:162–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Shannon MC (1985) Principles and strategies in breeding for higher salt tolerance. Plant Soil 89:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zeng L, Poss JA, Wilson C, Draz AE, Gregorio GB, Grieve CM (2003) Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by physiological characters. Euphytica 129:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atomic Energy Agency 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Souleymane Bado
    • 1
  • Brian P. Forster
    • 1
  • Abdelbagi M. A. Ghanim
    • 1
  • Joanna Jankowicz-Cieslak
    • 1
  • Günter Berthold
    • 1
  • Liu Luxiang
    • 2
  1. 1.Plant Breeding and Genetics LaboratoryJoint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and AgricultureViennaAustria
  2. 2.Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations