Advertisement

Climate Change Through the Lens of Feminist Philosophy

  • Nancy TuanaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 317)

Abstract

This essay offers an overview of feminist philosophical reflections on climate change. Feminist philosophical work in the fields of epistemology, philosophy of science, and environmental studies, as well as feminist ethical and social/political perspectives have the potential to make essential contributions to discourses on climate change. In particular, a feminist philosophical lens is particularly salient in identifying gendered conceptualizations in climate change knowledge (sciences, including the social sciences) and practices (policy and activist responses). These gendered constructions are often less visible than the differential impacts of climate change on the lives of women and men, but as they permeate what we know and do not know, what we value and value less, as well as how we do and do not act, they are essential to gender justice in the context of climate change.

Keywords

Anthropogenic climate change Feminist philosophy Relational ontology Corporeal vulnerability Values and science Epistemology of ignorance Situated knowledges Indigenous knowledge Care ethics Viscous porosity 

References

  1. Alston, M. (2012). Rural male suicide in Australia. Social Science and Medicine, 74(4), 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (2011). Democracy, public policy, and lay assessments of scientific testimony. Episteme, 8(2), 144–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, D. G. (Ed.). (2014). The ethics of global climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bordo, S. (1987). The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  5. Broome, J. (2004). Weighing lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D. A. (2012). Climate change ethics: Navigating the perfect moral storm. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Buck, H. J., Gammon, A. R., & Preston, C. (2014). Gender and geoengineering. Hypatia, 29(1), 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable?. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Coady, D., & Corry, R. (2013). The climate change debate: An epistemic and ethical enquiry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cochrane, R. (2014). Climatic change, buen vivir, and the dialectic of enlightenment: Toward a feminist critical philosophy of climate justice. Hypatia, 29(1), 576–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Code, L. (2006). Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Code, L. (2014). Culpable ignorance? Hypatia, 29(1), 670–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cripps, E. (2013). Climate change and the moral agent: Individual duties in an interdependent world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuomo, C. J. (2011). Climate change, vulnerability, and responsibility. Hypatia, 26(4), 690–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dankelman, I. (2010). Gender and climate change: An introduction. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  19. Deitz, S., Hope, C., Stern, N., & Zenghelis, D. (2007). Reflections on the Stern review: A robust case for strong action to reduce the risks of climate change. World Economics, 8(1), 121–168.Google Scholar
  20. Denton, F. (2002). Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter? Gender and Development, 10(2), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diekmann, S., & Zwart, S. D. (2014). Modeling for fairness: A Rawlsian approach. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 46, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dobson, A. (2009). 10:10 and the politics of climate change. Open democracy. http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/10-10-and-the-politics-of-climate-change. Accessed Jan 10, 2015.
  23. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 1101–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical challenge of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gardiner, S. M., Caney, S., Jamieson, D., & Shue, H. (2010). Climate ethics: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Glazebrook, P. (2011). Women and climate change: A case-study from Northeast Ghana. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 26(4), 762–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grasswick, H. (2014). Climate change science and responsible trust: A situated approach. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29(1), 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayward, B. (2008). Let’s talk about the weather: Decentering democratic debate about climate change. Hypatia, 23(3), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectorial Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Irwin, Ruth. (2010). Climate change and philosophy: Transformational possibilities. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. James, W. (1958). Essays in radical empiricism: A plural universe. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  37. Keller, E. F., & Longino, H. (1996). Feminism and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society, 10, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacGregor, S. (2010). A stranger silence still: The need for feminist social research on climate change. Sociological Review, 57, 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacGregor, S. (2014). Only resist: Feminist ecological citizenship and the post-politics of climate change. Hypatia, 29(1), 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Masika, R. (Ed.) (2002). Gender and development: Special issue on climate change, 10(2), 2–9.Google Scholar
  44. McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F. Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., & White, K. S. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Medina, J. (2012). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., Walker, B., Birkmann, J., Van der Leeuw, S., Rockström, J., Hinkel, J., Downing, T., Folke, C., & Nelson, D. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society 15(3), 11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art11/. Accessed Jan 10, 2015.
  47. Mills, C. S. (1997). The racial contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Moellendorf, D. (2014). The moral challenge of dangerous climate change: Values, poverty, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Nagel, J. (2015). Gender and climate change: Science, skepticism, security, and policy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Nakashima, D. J., Galloway McLean, K., Thulstrup, H. D., Ramos Castillo, A., & Rubis, J. T. (2012). Weathering uncertainty: Traditional knowledge for climate change assessment and adaptation. Paris, Darwin: UNESCO, UNU.Google Scholar
  51. Neimanis, A., & Walker, R. (2014). Weathering: Climate change and the ‘thick time’ of transcorporeality. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29(1), 558–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelson, L. H. (1990). Who knows? From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nelson, J. A. (2008). Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelson, J. A. (2011). Ethics and the economist: What climate change demands of us. GDAE Working paper, Vol. 11(02).Google Scholar
  55. Oreskes, N. (2007). The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know that we’re not wrong? In F. C. Dimento & P. Doughman (Eds.), Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren (pp. 65–99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  57. Parker, W. (2010). Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles and probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parker, W. (2011). When climate models agree: The significance of robust model predictions. Philosophy of Science, 78(4), 579–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parker, W. (2013). Ensemble modeling, uncertainty and robust predictions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(3), 213–223.Google Scholar
  60. Parker, W. (2014). Values and uncertainties in climate prediction, revisited. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 46, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Potter, E. (2001). Gender and Boyle’s laws of gases. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Robinson, F. (2011). The ethics of care: A feminist approach to human security. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Seager, J. (2009). Death by degrees: Taking a feminist hard look at the 2° climate policy. Kvinder, Køn, & Forskning, 3, 11–21.Google Scholar
  64. Shue, H. (2014). Climate justice: Vulnerability and protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, J. B., Schneider, S. H., Oppenheimer, M., Yohe, G. W., Hare, W., Mastrandrea, M. D., et al. (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(11), 4133–4137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative. (2011). Solar radiation management: The governance of research. http://www.srmgi.org/files/2012/01/DES2391_SRMGI-report_web_11112.pdf. Accessed Jan 10, 2015.
  67. Steffen, W., Persson, Å., Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., et al. (2011). The anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40(7), 739–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Svoboda, T., & Irvine, P. (2014). Ethical and technical Challenges in compensating for harm due to solar radiation management geoengineering. Ethics Policy & Environment, 17(2), 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Terry, G. (Ed.). (2009). Climate change and gender justice. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
  71. Thompson, A., & Bendik-Keymer, J. (2012). Ethical adaptation to climate change: Human virtues of the future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tschakert, P., & Tuana, N. (2013). Situated resilience: Reframing vulnerability and security in the context of climate change. In J. Dugard, A. L. Clair, & S. Gloppen (Eds.), Climate change talk: Rights, poverty and justice (pp. 75–96). Claremont, South Africa: Juta Press.Google Scholar
  74. Tschakert, P., Tutu, R., & Alcaro, A. (2013). Embodied experiences of environmental and climatic changes in landscapes of everyday life in Ghana. Emotion Space and Society, 7, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tuana, N. (1989). Feminism and science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tuana, N. (2008). Viscous porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 188–213). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Tuana, N. (2013). Gendering climate knowledge for justice: Catalyzing a new research agenda. In M. Alston & K. Whittenbury (Eds.), Research, action and policy: Addressing the gendered impacts of climate change (pp. 17–31). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tuana, N. (2015a). Climate change and place: Delimiting cosmopolitanism. In J. Wahman, J. Medina, & J. Stuhr (Eds.), Cosmopolitanism and place. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Tuana, N. (2015b). Being affected by climate change: The anthropocene and the body of ethics. In K. Shockley & A. Light (Eds.), Ethics and the anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  80. Tuana, N., & Cuomo, C. (Eds.) (2014). Special issue of Hypatia on climate change. Hypatia, 29(1).Google Scholar
  81. Tuana, N., Sriver, R., Svoboda, T., Olson, R., Irvine, P. J., Haqq-Misra, J., et al. (2012). Towards integrated ethical and scientific analysis of geoengineering: A research agenda. Ethics Policy and Environment, 15(2), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tuana, N., & Sullivan, S. (2006). Introduction: Feminist epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia, 21(3), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. United Nations Commission on the Status of Women. (2002). Report on the forty-sixth session (4–15 and 25 March 2002), Economic and Social Council. Official records 2002. Supplement No. 7 (E/2002/27-E/CN.6/2002/13). New York.Google Scholar
  84. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf. Accessed Jan 10, 2015.
  85. Whyte, K. P. (2014). Indigenous women’s networks, climate change impacts, and collective action. Hypatia, 29(1), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  87. Young, I. M. (2006). De-centering deliberative democracy. Kettering Review, 24(3), 43–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations