Abstract
This chapter explores the idea that partnership-based practices intensify the pedagogic nature of work that may not be traditionally seen as such. It brings a four-dimensional view of professional practices into contact with the arguments about professional learning presented in Chap. 9. It entangles these with basic Vygotskian concepts of the zone of proximal development and scaffolding . Focusing on the pedagogic work of supporting families who stay on the Residential Unit enables different features of professional practices, learning and expertise to be highlighted. Continuing the thread from the previous chapter, this pedagogic work is characterized by uncertainty and ambiguity, conceptualized here in terms of pedagogies of the unknown. The chapter begins by exploring forms of scaffolding and professional expertise learning in practice associated with them. It then presents a new concept of nanopedagogies. Nanopedagogies are transformative encounters founded upon professionals attuning to families. The significance of what is noticed is made available to parents, and then their role as the driving force in bringing about positive change is highlighted. These three steps of noticing, significance and attribution form a basic framework for reinterpreting the past in order to change possibilities for the future, and they are in evidence in multiple forms and contexts across the Unit. The chapter concludes by exploring pedagogic continuity —key ideas that are widespread, helping professionals act in conditions of uncertainty, and providing some stable basis for pedagogies of the unknown.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Benadusi, M. (2014). Pedagogies of the unknown: Unpacking ‘culture’ in disaster risk reduction education. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 22(3), 174–183. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12050
Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Črnčec, R., Barnett, B., & Matthey, S. (2008). Development of an instrument to assess perceived self-efficacy in the parents of infants. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(5), 442–453. doi:10.1002/nur.20271
Davis, H., & Day, C. (2010). Working in partnership: The family partnership model. London: Pearson.
Day, C., Ellis, M., & Harris, L. (2015). Family partnership model reflective practice handbook. London: Centre for Parent and Child Support for South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London.
Delamont, S., Parry, O., & Atkinson, P. (1997). Critical mass and pedagogic continuity: Studies in academic habitus. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(4), 533–549. doi:10.1080/0142569970180404
Edwards, A. (2000). Looking at action research through lenses of sociocultural psychology and activity theory. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 195–204. doi:10.1080/09650790000200104
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Dordrecht: Springer.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge.
Fowler, C., & Lee, A. (2007). Knowing how to know: Questioning ‘knowledge transfer’ as a model for knowing and learning in health. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 181–193. doi:10.1080/01580370701403399
Fowler, C., Dunston, R., Lee, A., Rossiter, C., & McKenzie, J. (2012a). Reciprocal learning in partnership practice: An exploratory study of a home visiting program for mothers with depression. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 99–112. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2011.611800
Fowler, C., Lee, A., Dunston, R., Chiarella, M., & Rossiter, C. (2012b). Co-producing parenting practice: Learning how to do child and family health nursing differently. Australian Journal of Child and Family Health Nursing, 9(1), 7–11.
Fowler, C., Rossiter, C., Bigsby, M., Hopwood, N., Lee, A., & Dunston, R. (2012c). Working in partnership with parents: The experience and challenge of practice innovation in child and family health nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(21–22), 3306–3314. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04270.x
Ger, G., & Kravets, O. (2009). Special and ordinary times: tea in motion. In E. Shove, F. Trentmann, & R. Wilk (Eds.), Time, consumption and everyday life: Practice, materiality and culture (pp. 189–202). Oxford: Berg.
Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Green, B., & Hopwood, N. (2015). The body in professional practice, learning and education: A question of corporeality? In B. Green & N. Hopwood (Eds.), The body in professional practice, learning and education: body/practice (pp. 15–33). Dordrecht: Springer.
Green, J., Whtiney, P., & Potegal, M. (2011). Screaming, yelling, whining and crying: Categorical and intensity differences in vocal expressions of anger and sadness in children’s tantrums. Emotion, 11(5), 1124–1133. doi:10.1037/a0024173
Hager, P. (2011). Theories of workplace learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 17–31). London: Sage.
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. doi:10.1086/227049
Hopwood, N. (2013). Understanding partnership practice in primary health as pedagogic work: What can Vygotsky’s theory of learning offer? Australian Journal of Primary Health. doi:10.1071/PY12141
Hopwood, N. (2014a). The fabric of practices: Times, spaces, bodies, things. In L. McLean, L. Stafford, & M. Weeks (Eds.), Exploring bodies in time and space (pp. 137–146). Oxfordshire: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Hopwood, N. (2014b). Four essential dimensions of workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(6/7), 349–363. doi:10.1108/JWL-09-2013-0069
Hopwood, N. (2014c). The rhythms of pedagogy: An ethnographic study of parenting education practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(2), 115–131. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2013.787983
Hopwood, N. (2014d). A sociomaterial account of partnership, signatures and accountability in practice. Professions & Professionalism, 4(2). doi:10.7577/pp.604
Hopwood, N. (2016). Expertise, learning, and agency in partnership practices in services for families with young children. In A. Edwards (Ed.), Working relationally in and across practices: cultural-historical approaches to collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopwood, N., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., & Siwe, K. (2014). Developing professional responsibility in medicine: A sociomaterial curriculum. In T. Fenwick & M. Nerland (Eds.), Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices, and responsibilities (pp. 171–183). London: Routledge.
Hopwood, N., & Clerke, T. (2012). Partnership and pedagogy in child and family health practice: A resource for professionals, educators and students. Hertsellung: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Jensen, K., & Christiansen, B. (2012). New patterns for epistemic engagement in nursing. In K. Jensen, L. C. Lahn, & M. Nerland (Eds.), Professional learning in the knowledge society (pp. 211–228). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Jensen, K., Lahn, L. C., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2012). Professional learning in the knowledge society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lee, A., Dunston, R., & Fowler, C. (2012). Seeing is believing: An embodied pedagogy of ‘doing partnership’ in child and family health. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (pp. 267–276). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. London: Continuum.
Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robertson, D. L. (1996). Facilitating transformative learning: Attending to the dynamics of the educational helping relationship. Adult Education Quarterly, 47(1), 41–53. doi:10.1177/074171369604700104
Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2006). The time of activity. Continental Philosophy Review, 39(2), 155–182. doi:10.1007/s11007-006-9026-1
Schatzki, T. R. (2009). Timespace and the organization of social life. In F. Trentmann & R. Wilk (Eds.), Time, consumption and everyday life: Practice, materiality and culture (pp. 35–48). New York: Berg.
Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A primer on practices. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 13–26). Rotterdam: Sense.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hopwood, N. (2016). Professional Learning in Pedagogic Practices. In: Professional Practice and Learning. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26164-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26164-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26162-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26164-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)