Advertisement

Parallel Strip Segment Recognition and Application to Metallic Tubular Object Measure

  • Nicolas Aubry
  • Bertrand KerautretEmail author
  • Isabelle Debled-Rennesson
  • Philippe Even
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9448)

Abstract

The segmentation or the geometric analysis of specular object is known as a difficult problem in the computer vision domain. It is also true for the problem of line detection where the specular reflection implies numerous false positive line detection or missing lines located on the dark parts of the object. This limitation reduces its potential use for concrete industrial applications where metallic objects are frequent. In this work, we propose to overcome this limitation by proposing a new strategy which is not based on the image gradient as usually, but exploits the image intensity profile defined inside a parallel strip primitive. Associated to a digital straight segment recognition algorithm robust to noise, we demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed method with a real industrial application.

References

  1. 1.
    DGtal: Digital Geometry tools and algorithms library. http://libdgtal.org
  2. 2.
    Achanta, R., Shaji, A., Smith, K., Lucchi, A., Fua, P., Süsstrunk, S.: SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34(11), 2274–2282 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akinlar, C., Topal, C.: EDLines: a real-time line segment detector with a false detection control. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 32(13), 1633–1642 (2011). http://ceng.anadolu.edu.tr/CV/EDLines/demo.aspx CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvarez, L., Baumela, L., Márquez-Neila, P., Henríquez, P.: A real time morphological snakes algorithm. Image Process. Line 2, 1–7 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhowmick, P., Bhattacharya, B.B.: Fast polygonal approximation of digital curves using relaxed straightness properties. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29(9), 1590–1602 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buzer, L.: A simple algorithm for digital line recognition in the general case. Pattern Recogn. 40(6), 1675–1684 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, J., Raskar, R., Agrawal, A.: 3D pose estimation and segmentation using specular cues. In: CVPR 2009, pp. 1706–1713 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Couprie, C., Grady, L., Najman, L., Talbot, H.: Power watersheds: a new image segmentation framework extending graph cuts, random walker and optimal spanning forest. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 731–738. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cousty, J., Najman, L.: Incremental algorithm for hierarchical minimum spanning forests and saliency of watershed cuts. In: Soille, P., Pesaresi, M., Ouzounis, G.K. (eds.) ISMM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6671, pp. 272–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cousty, J., Najman, L., Perret, B.: Constructive links between some morphological hierarchies on edge-weighted graphs. In: Hendriks, C.L.L., Borgefors, G., Strand, R. (eds.) ISMM 2013. LNCS, vol. 7883, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Debled-Rennesson, I., Feschet, F., Rouyer-Degli, J.: Optimal blurred segments decomposition of noisy shapes in linear times. Comput. Graphics 30, 30–36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durou, J.D., Falcone, M., Sagona, M.: Numerical methods for shape-from-shading: a new survey with benchmarks. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 109(1), 22–43 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Even, P., Malavaud, A.: Semi-automated edge segment specification for an interactive modelling system of robot environments. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 33(B5), 222–229 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Getreuer, P.: Chan-Vese segmentation. Image Process. Line 2, 214–224 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grompone von Gioi, R., Jakubowicz, J., Morel, J.M., Randall, G.: LSD: a line segment detector. Image Process. Line 2, 35–55 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haldo, S., Juan, C.: A review of classic edge detectors. Image Process. Line 5, 90–123 (2015). doi: 10.5201/ipol.2015.35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kerautret, B., Lachaud, J.O.: Curvature estimation along noisy digital contours by approximate global optimization. Pattern Recogn. 42(10), 2265–2278 (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kerautret, B., Even, P.: Blurred segments in gray level images for interactive line extraction. In: Wiederhold, P., Barneva, R.P. (eds.) IWCIA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5852, pp. 176–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naegel, B., Passat, N.: Interactive segmentation based on component-trees. Image Process. Line 4, 89–97 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nguyen, T.P., Debled-Rennesson, I.: A discrete geometry approach for dominant point detection. Pattern Recogn. 44(1), 32–44 (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Aubry
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bertrand Kerautret
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Isabelle Debled-Rennesson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Philippe Even
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Université de Lorraine, LORIA, UMR 7503Vandoeuvre-lès-nancyFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, LORIA, UMR 7503Vandoeuvre-lès-nancyFrance

Personalised recommendations