Advertisement

Knowledge Management for Virtual Education Through Ontologies

  • Ana MuñozEmail author
  • Victor Lopez
  • Katty Lagos
  • Mitchell Vásquez
  • Jorge Hidalgo
  • Nestor Vera
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9416)

Abstract

Current knowledge management focuses on knowledge acquisition, storage, retrieval and maintenance. E-Learning systems technology today is used primarily for training courses about carefully selected topics to be delivered to students registered for those courses. Knowledge management is used to rapidly capture, organize and deliver large amounts of corporate knowledge. The practice of adding value to information by capturing tacit knowledge and converting it into explicit knowledge is known as Knowledge Management. Ontologies can represent an existing knowledge from a domain, in this work; ontologies allow to model different aspects of knowledge management for virtual education in higher education. Universities, from the perspective of knowledge management, provide an updated concept of higher education where knowledge is considered a product, and the customers are students. This paper explains an ontological framework, used to model and integrate knowledge management processes and technological architecture for knowledge management in virtual education.

Keywords

Knowledge Management Virtual Education Ontology Higher Education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aggarwal, P.D., Ravi, K., Anil K.V.: Enhancing Curriculum and Research in Higher Education with a Strategic Use of Knowledge Management. Global Journal of Management and Business Research 11(12) (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anvari, A., et al.: Analysis of Knowledge Management within Five Key Areas. Journal of Knowledge Management. Economics and Information Technology 1(6) (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjamins, R., Dieter, F., Asunción, G.-P.: Knowledge management through ontologies. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS. org) (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bueno, E., Azúa, S.: Medición del capital intelectual: modelo Intelect. Instituto Universitario Euroforum Escorial, Madrid (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marla, C., Luis, R., Ana, M.B., Leonardo, C., Richard, G.: Ontological model to support decision making in educational opportunities. Rev. FacEng UCV. v.25 n.3. (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandrasekaran, B., John R.J., Benjamins, V.R.: The ontology of tasks and methods (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davenport, T.H., Laurence, P.: Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fernández-López, M., Asunción, G.-P., Natalia, J.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleming, N., Baume, D.: Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree!. Educational Developments 7(4)(2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruber, T.R.: The role of common ontology in achieving sharable, reusable knowledge bases. KR 91, 601–602 (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, W., et al.: An intelligent semantic e-learning framework using context-aware Semantic Web technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology 37(3), 351–373 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kende, G., Erzsébet, N., György, S.: Role of the knowledge management in modern higher education–the e-learning. EDUCATION 6(4), 559–573 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R.W., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The protégé owl plugin: an open development environment for semantic web applications. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 229–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loh, B., et al.: Applying knowledge management in university research (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muñoz A., Lamolle M., Pérez J., Ramirez Y., Uzcátegui M., Angarita D.: ontological model to interactive distance education since knowledge management. In: JIISIC, The Latin American Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muñoz A., Sandia, B.: Knowledge Management System CEIDIS. Quality Interactive Distance Education Virtual Iberoamerican Congress on Distance Education Quality. Eduq @ (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Munoz, A., Lamolle, M., Le Duc, C.: Un modèle ontologique pour l’apprentissage collaboratif en formation interactive à distance”. 1er congrès National de la Recherche en IUT, Tours, France (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5(1), 14–37 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paniagua, E., et al.: Knowledge Technology Management. Technical Report. Murcia University. (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sureephong, P., et al.:An ontology-based knowledge management system for industry clusters. In: Global Design to Gain a Competitive Edge. Springer, London, pp. 333−342 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Muñoz
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Victor Lopez
    • 3
  • Katty Lagos
    • 2
  • Mitchell Vásquez
    • 2
  • Jorge Hidalgo
    • 2
  • Nestor Vera
    • 2
  1. 1.CEMISID Los Andes UniversityMéridaVenezuela
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentAgrarian of Ecuador UniversityGuayaquilEcuador
  3. 3.GIISICTechnological of Panamá UniversityPanamaPanama

Personalised recommendations