Skip to main content

Towards an Adaptive Tool and Method for Collaborative Ontology Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2015 Workshops (OTM 2015)

Abstract

Linked Data makes available a vast amount of data on the Semantic Web for agents, both human and software, to consume. Linked Data datasets are made available with different ontologies, even when their domains overlap. The interoperability problem that rises when one needs to consume and combine two or more of such datasets to develop a Linked Data application or mashup is still an important challenge. Ontology-matching techniques help overcome this problem. The process, however, often relies on knowledge engineers to carry out the tasks as they have expertise in ontologies and semantic technologies. It is reasonable to assume that knowledge engineers should require help from the domain experts, end users, etc. to contribute in the validation of the results and help distilling ontology mappings from these correspondences. However, the current design for the ontology-mapping tools does not take into consideration the different types of users expected to be involved in the creation of Linked Data applications or mashups. In this paper, we identify the different users and their roles in the mapping involved in the context of developing Linked Data mashups and propose a collaborative mapping method in which we prescribe where collaboration between the different stakeholders could, and should, take place. In addition, we propose a tool architecture based on bringing together an adaptive interface, mapping services, workflow services and agreement services that will ease the collaboration between the different stakeholders. This output will be used in an ongoing study to constructing a collaborative mapping platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data-the story so far. Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging Concepts, 205–227 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E.: Schema matching and mapping. Springer, Heidelberg (DE) (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.B.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 18, 323–364 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein, P.A., Madhavan, J., Rahm, E.: Generic schema matching, ten years later. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 4, 695–701 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 25, 158–176 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Falconer, S.M.: Cognitive support for semi-automatic ontology mapping. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked data: Evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis Lectures On The Semantic Web: Theory And Technolog 1, 1–136 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noy, N.F.: Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. ACM Sigmod Record 33, 65–70 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunz, W., Rittel, H.W.J.: Issues as elements of information systems. University of California Berkeley, California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van der Meij, L., Isaac, A., Zinn, C.: A web-based repository service for vocabularies and alignments in the cultural heritage domain. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6088, pp. 394–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Dahl, Y., Svendsen, R.-M.: End-user composition interfaces for smart environments: a preliminary study of usability factors. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) HCII 2011 and DUXU 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6770, pp. 118–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Wesson, J.L., Singh, A., van Tonder, B.: Can adaptive interfaces improve the usability of mobile applications? In: Forbrig, P., Paternó, F., Mark Pejtersen, A. (eds.) HCIS 2010. IFIP AICT, vol. 332, pp. 187–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mochol, M.: The methodology for finding suitable ontology matching approaches. Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Euzenat, J., Le Duc, C.: Methodological guidelines for matching ontologies. In: Ontology Engineering In A Networked World, pp. 257–278. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noy, N.F., Griffith, N., Musen, M.A.: Collecting community-based mappings in an ontology repository. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 371–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Conroy, C., O’sullivan, D., Lewis, D.: Ontology mapping through tagging. In: International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS 2008, pp. 886–891. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Conroy, C.: Towards semantic mapping for casual web users. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 907–913. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Conroy, C., Brennan, R., Sullivan, D.O., Lewis, D.: User evaluation study of a tagging approach to semantic mapping. In: Aroyo, L., Traverso, P., Ciravegna, F., Cimiano, P., Heath, T., Hyvönen, E., Mizoguchi, R., Oren, E., Sabou, M., Simperl, E. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 623–637. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramy Shosha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shosha, R., Debruyne, C., O’Sullivan, D. (2015). Towards an Adaptive Tool and Method for Collaborative Ontology Mapping. In: Ciuciu, I., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2015 Workshops. OTM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9416. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26138-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26138-6_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26137-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26138-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics