Skip to main content

Playing Pong with the Mind? Pettit’s Program Model and Mental Causation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philip Pettit: Five Themes from his Work

Part of the book series: Münster Lectures in Philosophy ((MUELP,volume 1))

  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

Pettit’s program model aims at explaining causation at different levels of description, and it is considered to be applicable also to the case of mental causation. Here we question whether the sort of explanation offered by the program model faithfully accounts for the ontological aspects of causation. By applying the program model to the case of the computer game “Pong”, we show that the program model identifies causation also in cases where the relationship between events is intuitively of a purely epiphenomenal kind. Hence, the model should not be considered as a faithful identifier of “real” causation. In drawing an analogy to mental causation, we conclude that the program model would either (1) not be applicable to mental causation, (2) lead to reductive physicalism, or (3) be compatible with epiphenomenalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Hüttemann, A., and D. Papineau. 2005. Physicalism decomposed. Analysis 65(285): 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T.H. 1874. On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. The Fortnightly Review 16: 550–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. 1998. From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F., and P. Pettit. 1990. Causation in the philosophy of mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50: 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. 1976. Events as property exemplifications. In Action theory, ed. D. Walton and M. Brand, 159–177. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. 2005. Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1995. Causality at higher levels. In Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, Fyssen Foundation, ed. D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A. Premack, 399–421. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinwald, R. 2012 [1994]. Causation and intensionality: A problem for naturalism. In Rosemarie Rheinwald: Logik, Kausalität, Freiheit – Ausgewählte Aufsätze/Logic, Causality, Freedom – Selected Papers, ed. J.G. Michel and O.R. Scholz. Paderborn: Mentis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1912. On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. 2007. Epiphenomenalism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/epipheno/. Accessed 28 Aug 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Joris Boström .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boström, K.J., Leonhard, G., Steinmetz, L. (2016). Playing Pong with the Mind? Pettit’s Program Model and Mental Causation. In: Derpmann, S., Schweikard, D. (eds) Philip Pettit: Five Themes from his Work. Münster Lectures in Philosophy, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26103-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics