Advertisement

Environmental Integration in China’s Eco-city Development—From an Institutional Perspective

  • Ying YinEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In the last decade, Eco-City development has been emerging as test beds in China, not only for environmental technologies but also for a new integrated approach of urban planning to achieve better environmental performance in the urban areas development. The study aims to build knowledge, from legal aspects, on how environmental integration in sustainable urban planning is achieved or hindered in China’s eco-city practice. The lessons are as well supposed to give some implications for sustainable urban development in future. The study is based on an overview of China’s national institutional condition for sustainable urban development and a case study of two examples of Tangshan Bay Eco-city and the Sino-Swedish Low-Carbon Eco-City in China. Methods of literature review, document studies, study visits and interviews were applied for gathering relevant knowledge and collecting empirical data on the cases. To conclude, in spite of some progress, the absence of a holistic perspective and effective guidance and constraints in China’s environmental and planning formal rules at different levels appeared as an institutional weakness, hindering environmental integration in urban planning process. Whether or not environmental requirements and their status was clearly stated in the formal rules, such as regulatory detailed plans and land use agreements, also considerably affected the enforcement of environmental integration in urban planning process. In addition, the results indicate an important role of powerful actors, such as local leaders and governments, in issuing an improved legitimacy of high environmental requirements in sustainable urban development through changing formal institutional conditions.

Keywords

Environmental integration Sustainable urban planning Eco-city development Legal aspects China 

References

  1. Birkeland J (2002) Design for sustainability: a sourcebook of integrated ecological solutions. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai ZC, Yin Y, Wennerstern R (2013) From energy efficiency to integrated sustainability in housing development in China: a case study in a hot-summer/cold-winter zone in China. J Hous Built Environ 28(2):329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalal-Clayton B, Bass S (2002) Sustainable development strategies: a resource book. Organisation for economic co-operation and development, Paris and United Nations Development Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. DiMaggio JD, Powell WW (1991) Introduction. In: Powell WW, DiMaggio JD (eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Flipse L (2007) Environmental policy integration and spatial planning: an evaluation of the MILO and LOGO spatial planning. Master thesis, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao SM (2013) The construction of the Sino-Swedish Low-carbon Eco-city, Wuxi, starts off, and will be accomplished within five years. Wuxi Daily. Retrieved 20 May 2015, from http://www.wxrb.com/node/kandian/2013-4-9/F25H44ECG429542.html
  7. Hai XP (2009) Report III: Strategy research for sustainable urban planning. In: China’s research council of urban science, China’s low carbon eco-city development strategy. China City Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  8. Jordan A, Lenschow A (2010) Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environ Policy Gov 20(3):147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jordan A (2002) Efficient hardware and light green software: environmental policy integration in the UK. In: Lenschow A (ed) Environmental policy integration: greening sectoral policies in Europe. Earthscan, London, pp 35–56Google Scholar
  10. Lin P, Tian XX (2011) The implementation and specification of the indicator system in Cao Feidian eco-city planning. Constr Sci Technol 13:40–44Google Scholar
  11. Liu Y (2011) The overall development and typical cases of China’s eco-cities. Constr Sci Technol 13:35–39Google Scholar
  12. National Development and Reform Commission of P.R.C. (NDRC of P.R.C.) (2010) The pilot projects of low-carbon ecological Provinces and Cities. Retrieved 1 Dec 2012, from http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/
  13. National Development and Reform Commission of P.R.C. (NDRC of P.R.C.) (2012) The second term of pilot projects of low-carbon ecological Provinces and Cities. Retrieved 1 Dec 2012, from http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/
  14. Nilsson M, Persson A (2003) Framework for analyzing environmental policy integration. J Environ Plann Policy Manage 5(4):333–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nilsson M (2005) Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 23(2):207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (Political economy of institutions and decisions). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olsson RA (2008) Planning metropolitan regions—Institutional perspectives and the case of spare. Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development) (2002) Improving policy coherence and integration for sustainable development—A checklistGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development) (2007) Environmental performance reviews, China.  Google Scholar
  20. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Owens SE (1990) Land-use planning for energy efficiency. In: Cullingworth JB (ed) Energy, land, and public policy. Energy policy studies, 5. Transaction Publishers, PiscatawayGoogle Scholar
  23. Persson Å (2007) Different perspectives on EPI. In: Nilsson M, Eckerberg K (eds) Environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Ranhagen U (2009) Introduction of planning work for Caofeidian International Eco-City. World Archit 06:17–27Google Scholar
  25. Raydan D, Steemers K (2006) Environmental urban design. In: Santamouris M (ed) Environmental design of urban buildings: an integrated approach. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers R (1998) Cities for a small planet. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Runhaar H, Driessen PPJ, Soer L (2009) Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: an assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environ Plan 36(3):417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott WR (2001) Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  29. Seligsohn D, Heilmayr R, Tan XM, Weischer L (2009) China, the United States, and the climate change challenge. Wri policy brief. Retrieved 1 Dec 2011, from http://www.ccchina.gov.cn/en/column.asp?ColumnId=25
  30. Storbjörk S, Lähteenmäki-Smith K, Hilding-Rydevik T (2009) Conflict or consensus: the challenge of integrating environmental sustainability into regional development programming. Eur J Spat Dev 34:1–22Google Scholar
  31. Sweco (2008) Caofeidian international eco-city, Tangshan—Sustainability GuidelinesGoogle Scholar
  32. The MEP of the P.R.C. (Ministry of Environmental Protection of the P.R.C.) (2003) The construction indicators of ecological country, municipality and province (The pilot)Google Scholar
  33. The MEP of the P.R.C. (Ministry of Environmental Protection of the P.R.C.) (2009). Capacity building of national environment supervision: Mid-Term evaluation of the 11th Five-Year PlanGoogle Scholar
  34. The MEP of the P.R.C. (Ministry of Environmental Protection of the P.R.C.) (2013) Indicators of the pilot demonstration area for national ecological civilization construction (Trial)Google Scholar
  35. The MHURD of P.R.C. (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of P.R.C.) (2013a) Developing green houses and eco-city districts during the period of the 12th five-year planGoogle Scholar
  36. The MHURD of P.R.C. (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of P.R.C.) (2013b) Evaluation report of energy saving of buildings consumption in 2012Google Scholar
  37. The National People’s Congress of P.R.C (The NPC of P.R.C) (2008) Urban and Rural Planning Law of the P.R.C. Retrieved 12 July 2012, from http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2007-10/28/content_788494.html
  38. Tian XX (2012) Case study of eco-city urban planning—the case of Tangshan Bay Eco-city. Conference paper in Annual national planning conferenceGoogle Scholar
  39. Wandén S (2003) Society, systems and environmental objectives. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  40. Wheeler SM (2004) Planning for sustainability—creating livable, equitable, and ecological communities. Taylor and Francis, Abingdon, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williamson OE (1998) Transaction cost economics: how it works, where it is headed. De Economist 146(1):23–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wuxi City Government Office (2010) Three-year action plan for accelerating the implementation of the Sino-Swedish low-carbon eco-city in Taihu New CityGoogle Scholar
  43. Wuxi City People’s Congress (2012) Eco-city regulation in Taihu New City, WuxiGoogle Scholar
  44. Yin Y (2014) Environmental integration in sustainable urban planning from an institutional perspective. Doctor thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations