Advertisement

Tackling Climate Change Through the Elimination of Trade Barriers for Low-Carbon Goods: Multilateral, Plurilateral and Regional Approaches

  • Christopher FreyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

While the trade and environment debate has long focused on the adverse impact of environmental measures on free trade and vice versa and on securing policy space to regulate in the environmental interest, the focus has only recently started to shift to the potentially reinforcing relationship between trade and sustainable development. The present contribution explores this notion by discussing the liberalization of trade in low-carbon goods as a contribution to the fight against climate change. It provides an overview over the existing trade barriers and the efforts to eliminate these barriers for renewable energy goods and energy efficient technologies. The contribution furthermore identifies the liberalization potentials and main challenges in the multilateral, plurilateral and regional contexts. Perhaps surprisingly, mega-regional trade agreements are identified as the most promising venue to pursue ambitious liberalization efforts for low-carbon goods, if trade negotiators were willing to make this a central part of the agreements.

Keywords

Environmental goods Renewable Energy Non-tariff barriers Trade facilitation Climate change 

References

  1. APEC (2011) Leaders’ declaration—toward a seamless regional economy. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2011/2011_aelm.aspx
  2. APEC (2015) Committee on trade and investment. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.apec.org/Groups/Committee-on-Trade-and-Investment
  3. Balineau G, De Melo J (2013) Removing barriers to trade on environmental goods: an appraisal. World Trade Rev 12(4):693–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basheer S (2014) Enercon and positive patent perception. SpicyIP Blog. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://spicyip.com/2014/06/enercon-and-positive-patent-perception.html
  5. Carlarne C (2006) The Kyoto protocol & the WTO: reconciling tensions between free trade & environmental objectives. Colorado J Int Environ Law Policy 17(1):45–48Google Scholar
  6. Commission for Environmental Cooperation (1993) North American agreement on environmental cooperation (NAAEC), 14 Sept 1993, 32 ILM 1480, 1482. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=1226&SiteNodeID=567
  7. Cosbey A (2014) The green goods agreement: neither green nor good?. International Institute for Sustainable Development, IISD Commentary, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. Cottier T, Nartova O, Bigdeli SZ (2009) International trade regulation and the mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Ville F, Gheyle N (2014) The transatlantic trade agreement and the green economy: which way will the balance (T) tip? Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.eutradepolitics.ugent.be/?q=content/transatlantic-trade-agreement-and-green-economy-which-way-will-balance-ttip
  10. Dromgool T, Ybarra D (2015) The fair and equitable treatment standard and the revocation of feed in tariffs—Foreign renewable energy investments in Crisis-struck Spain. In: Mauerhofer V (ed) Legal aspects of sustainable development: horizontal and sectorial policy issues, (pp. -). Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  11. Euractiv.com (2015) Brussels, Washington seizing new regulatory powers through TTIP. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://www.euractiv.com/sections/trade-society/brussels-washington-boost-regulatory-powers-through-ttip-312005
  12. European Commission (2011a) Free trade agreement between the European Union and Singapore (not yet in force). Initialled text retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=961
  13. European Commission (2011b) Communication a roadmap for moving to a competitive Low-Carbon Economy in 2050. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0112
  14. European Commission (2014a) Joint statement regarding trade in environmental goods of 24 Jan 2014 at Davos. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/January/tradoc_152095.pdf
  15. European Commission (2014b) Investment provisions in the EU-Canada free trade agreement (CETA). Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/November/tradoc_151918.pdf.European
  16. European Commission Directorate-General Trade (2011) The EU-Korea free trade agreement in practice. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/October/tradoc_148303.pdf
  17. European Commission Directorate-General Trade (2013) The Economic Impact of the EU-Singapore free trade agreement. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/September/tradoc_151724.pdf
  18. European Commission Directorate-General Trade (2014) Public procurement in a nutshell. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/public-procurement/
  19. European Commission Directorate-General Trade (2015) Minutes of the civil society dialogue’s meeting on the trade and sustainability impact assessment of the environmental goods agreement. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/may/tradoc_153411.pdf
  20. Fliess B, Kim JA (2008) Non-tariff barriers facing trade in selected environmental goods and associated services. J World Trade 42(3):535–562Google Scholar
  21. Frey C (2015) Mega-regional trade agreements and post-2015 climate protection. JEEPL 12 (3–4) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  22. Gehring MW, Cordonier Segger MC, de Andrade Correa F, Reynaud P, Harrington A, Mella R (2013) Climate change and sustainable energy measures in regional trade agreements (RTAs): an overview. ICTSD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. Glachant M, Dussaux D, Ménière Y (2013) Promoting the international transfer of low-carbon technologies: evidence and policy challenges, report for the commissariat général à la stratégie et à la prospective. Retrieved 13 Oct 2001, from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/dechezle/Promoting_the_international_transfer_of_low_carbon_techs.pdf
  24. Hufbauer G, Kim JA (2012) Issues and considerations for negotiating a sustainable energy trade agreement, ICTSD global platform on climate change, trade and sustainable energy. ICTSD, GenevaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ICTSD (2014) The road ahead for the environmental goods agreement talks. BIORES 8(7):14–17. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/review/biores8-7_0.pdf
  26. IPCC (2000) Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer: summary for policymakers. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/tectran/index.php?idp=0
  27. Jha V (2013) Removing trade barriers on selected renewable energy products in the context of energy sector reforms: modelling environmental and economic impacts in a general equilibrium framework. ICTSD, GenevaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasteng J (2013) Trade remedies on clean energy: a new trend in need of multilateral initiatives. Geneva: E 15 InitiativeGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuntze JC, Moerenhout T (2013) Local content requirements and the renewable energy industry—a good match?. ICTSD, GenevaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lath A (2014) Breaking news: SC streamlines patent revocation procedures in Enercon Litigation. SpicyIP Blog. Retrieved 25 July 2015 from http://spicyip.com/2014/06/breaking-news-sc-streamlines-patent-revocation-proceedings-in-enercon-litigation.html
  31. Leal-Arcas R (2013) Climate change and international trade. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Littleton M (2008) The TRIPS agreement and transfer of climate-change-related technologies to developing countries. UN DESA Working Paper No. 71. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2008/wp71_2008.pdf
  33. Maskus KE, Okediji RL (2010) Intellectual property rights and international technology transfer to address climate change: risks, opportunities and policy options, ICTSD’s programme on iprs and sustainable development, Issue Paper No. 32. ICTSD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. Monkelbaan J (2014a) The benefits of a sustainable energy trade agreement (SETA). In: Cahoy DR, Colburn JE (eds) Law and the transition to business sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 103–123Google Scholar
  35. Monkelbaan J (2014b) Trade preferences for environmental goods and services, ICTSD global platform on climate change working paper. ICTSD, Geneva   Google Scholar
  36. North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (1993) (signed 8 September 1993, entered into force 1 January 1994) (1992) 32 ILM 1482Google Scholar
  37. OECD (2009) The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action Beyond 2012. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008) CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol 42(5):1401–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rai S, Payosova T (2015) Selling the sun safely and effectively: Solar photovoltaic (PV) standards, certification, testing and implications for trade policy. Geneva: ICTSD (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  40. REN21 (2014) Renewable energy policy network for the 21st century (2014) Renewables 2014 global status report. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://www.ren21.net
  41. Rubini L (2014) What does the recent WTO litigation on renewable energy subsidies tell us about methodology in legal analysis? the good, the bad, and the ugly. EUI Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. 2014/05Google Scholar
  42. Sugathan M (2013) Winds of change and rays of hope: how can the multilateral trading system facilitate trade in clean energy technologies and services? Geneva: the E15 initiative. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.e15initiative.org/publications
  43. Sugathan (2014) The road ahead for the environmental goods agreement talks, Biores Vol. 9 No. 8, ICTSD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  44. Sugathan M (2015) Addressing energy efficiency products in the environmental goods agreement, Issue Paper No 20. ICTSD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. Tarasofsky RG (1999) The WTO committee on trade and environment: is it making a difference? Max Planck Yearb United Nations Law 3:471–488Google Scholar
  46. UNCTAD (2014) Local content requirements and the green economy. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ditcted2013d7_en.pdf
  47. UNEP (2013) Green economy and trade—trends, challenges and opportunities. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy
  48. UNFCCC (2010) Report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session: decisions adopted. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=18
  49. United Nations (2002) Plan of implementation of the world summit on sustainable development (“Johannesburg Plan of Implementation”). Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/WSSD_PlanImpl.pdf
  50. United Nations (2012) The future we want, outcome document of the united nations conference on sustainable development (Rio + 20). Retrieved 25 July 2015, from https://rio20.un.org/sites/rio20.un.org/files/a-conf.216l-1_english.pdf.pdf
  51. USTR (2015) Trans-Pacific partnership (TPP): unlocking opportunity for Americans through trade with the Asia Pacific. Retrieved 25 July 2015 from https://ustr.gov/tpp
  52. van Asselt H, van der Grijp N, Oosterhuis F (2006) Greener public purchasing: opportunities for climate-friendly government procurement under WTO and EU rules. Clim Policy 6(2):217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vikhlyaev A (2004) Environmental goods and services: defining negotiations or negotiating definitions? J World Trade 38(1):93–122Google Scholar
  54. Wikileaks (2015) Leaked draft of the TPP Investment chapter on Wikileaks. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from https://wikileaks.org/tpp-investment/WikiLeaks-TPP-Investment-Chapter/page-1.html
  55. WIPO (2014) Global challenges report, renewable energy technology: evolution and policy implications—evidence from patent literature. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/policy/en/climate_change/pdf/ccmt_report.pdf
  56. WTO (1994) Agreement on Government Procurement, (signed 15 April 1994, entered into force 1 January 1996) 1915 UNTS 103Google Scholar
  57. WTO (2001) Doha Ministerial Declaration, adopted on 14 Nov 2001. Retrieved 25 July 2015 from https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm
  58. WTO (2011) Committee on trade and environment in special session report by the chairman to the trade negotiations committee of 21 April 2011, WTO Document TN/TE/20Google Scholar
  59. WTO (2012) 15 Years of the information technology agreement: trade, innovation and global production networks. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/ita15years_2012_e.htm
  60. WTO (2015) Tariff database. Retrieved 25 July 2015, from http://tariffdata.wto.org/ReportersAndProducts.aspx
  61. Wu M (2014) Why developing countries won’t negotiate? the case of the WTO environmental goods agreement. Trade Law Dev 6:93–176Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dresden University of TechnologyDresdenGermany
  2. 2.University of Canterbury School of LawChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations