Abstract
It is a truism that to be effective, the concept of sustainable development (SD) needs to be functionally operational. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) provides such an opportunity; yet EIA also presents decision-makers with a vast array of competing criteria compelling decision makers to prioritize and make trade-offs. Moreover, legislation provides little guidance on how to prioritize these criteria and still achieve SD. Using the Australian state of New South Wales as a case study, the discussion evaluates the relationship between policy, legislation and the weight given to SD. The topic is important for policy makers, decision-makers, proponents of development and conservationists. The paper draws on two bodies of work: the literature on prioritising and trade-offs in decision-making by authors such as Brownlie and Retief et al.; and the paradigms and models of science identified by Cashmore. It proffers a means of curtailing the wide discretion available to decision-makers using civic science, which to be effective, needs to be legislatively-based.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Information paper: towards the Australian environmental-economic accounts, Chap. 3 Energy (27 Mar 2013), 4655.0.55.002. Retrieved 15 Mar 2015. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/4655.0.55.002~2013~Main+Features~Chapter+3+Energy?OpenDocument
Barrak Corporation Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (2014) New South Wales land and environment court 177
Bates G (2013) Environmental law in Australia, 8th edn. LexisNexis Butterworths, Australia, pp 1–964
Bond AJ, Morrison-Saunders A (2011) Re-evaluating sustainability assessment: aligning the vision and the practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(1):1–7
Brownlie S, King N, Treweek J (2013) Biodiversity tradeoffs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making: can we stop the loss? Impact Assess Project Appraisal 31(1):24–33
Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure and Warkworth Mining Limited (2013) NSWLEC 48
Cashmore M (2004) The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(4):403–426
Colyvan M, Justus J, Regan HM (2011) The conservation game. Biol Conserv 144(4):1246–1253
Demidova O, Cherp A (2005) Risk assessment for improved treatment of health considerations in EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25(4):411–429
Ecosystem approach (22 June 2000) Adopted by the conference of the parties to the CBD in decision V/6 set out in report of the fifth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity 103 UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23
EDO (June 2013) NSW white paper submission, 1-93. Retrieved 15 Mar 2015. http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/edonsw/pages/180/attachments/original/1380534662/130628NSWPlanningWhitePaper_EDONSWsubmission.pdf?1380534662
Eisenberg MA (1978) Participation, responsiveness, and the consultative process: an essay for Lon Fuller. Harvard Law Rev 92:410–432
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/epaaa1979389/
Filming Approval Act 2004 (NSW) Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/faa2004177/
Fisher D (2013) Legal reasoning in environmental law: a study of structure, Form and Language. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Gibson RB (2013) Avoiding sustainability trade-offs in environmental assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 31(1):2–12
Grumbine RE (1997) Reflections on what is ecosystem management? Conserv Biol 11:41–47
H & J Standen Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure (2014) New South Wales land and environment court 113
IUCN (1980) World conservation strategy: living resource conservation for sustainable development, gland: IUCN, 1-77. Retrieved 15 Mar 2015. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/WCS-004.pdf
Kidd M (2008) Removing the green-tinted spectacles: the three pillars of sustainable development in South African environmental law. S Afr J Environ Law Policy 15:85–102
Local Government (Town and Country Planning) Amendment Act (1945) (NSW) Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_act/lgacpaa1945n21561.pdf
MacDonald I (2004) Minister for primary industries second reading speech, filming approval bill 2004 (NSW), NSW hansard articles: LC: 02/06/2004: #42. Retrieved 15 Mar 2015. http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/nswbills.nsf/0/87669a32fd2d64f5ca256e8b0010b09e/$FILE/C3804.pdf
Makmor M, Ismail Z (2014) A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Jurnal Teknologi 70(1):15–22
Martin P, Williams J (2014) Science, hubris and insufficient legal safeguards? Environ Plann and Law J 31:311–326
Mauerhofer V (2008) 3-D sustainability: an approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development. Ecol Econ 63:496–506
Mauerhofer V (2012) A ‘legislation-check’ based on ‘3-D Sustainability’—addressing global precautionary land governance. Land Use Policy 29:652–660
McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung TC, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, Mutekanga D, Thang HV, Dammert JL, Pulgar-Vidal M, Welch-Devine M, Brosius JP, Coppolillo P, O’Connor S (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol Conserv 144(3):966–972
SEPP Mining (2013) State environmental planning policy (mining, petroleum production and extractive industries) amendment (resource significance). amended state environmental planning policy (mining, petroleum production and extractive industries [2007-65]. Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_epi/seppppaeia201320135811004.pdf
Morrison-Saunders A, Bailey J (2003) Practitioner perspectives on the role of science in environmental impact assessment. Environ Manage 31(6):683–695
Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F (2013) Editorial. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 31(1):1
National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974) (NSW). Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/npawa1974247/
National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development (1992) Australian government, department of the environment. Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www.environment.gov.au/about-us/esd/publications/national-esd-strategy
Norm Fletcher & Associates Pty Limited v Strathfield Municipal Council (2014) New South Wales land and environment court 157
Palmer C (1997) Environmental ethics. ABC-CLIO, California
Planning Bill (2013) (NSW) Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/nswbills.nsf/0/33E72AD6EA1238B5CA257C0C0014134D
Prest J (2007) The Bald Hills Wind Farm debacle. In: Bonhady T, Christoff P (eds) Climate law in Australia. Federation Press, Australia, pp 230–261
Retief R, Morrison-Saunders A, Geneletti D, Pope J (2013) Exploring the psychology of trade-off decision-making in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 31(1):13
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992) Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, 3 June-14 June A/CONF.151/26 (vol. I). Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm
Schaffer v Hawkesbury (1992) New South Wales land and environment court 77
SEPP 55 (1998) State environmental planning policy No 55—remediation of land (SEPP 55). Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/assessingdev/pdf/sepp55_remediatio.pdf
State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage (2014) NSW biodiversity offsets policy for major projects. Office of environment and heritage for the NSW Government (2014). Retrieved 15 Mar 2015. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/biodivoffsets/bioffsetspol.htm
Stein P (2000) Are decision-makers too cautious with the precautionary principle? Environ Plann Law J 17(1):3–23
Taralga Landscape Guardians Inc v Minister for Planning and RES Southern Cross Pty Ltd (2007) New South Wales land and environment court 59
Telstra Corporation Limited v Hornsby Shire Council (2006) New South Wales land and environment court 133, para. 123, Preston chief justice
The Law Society of New South Wales, Young Lawyers, Environment and Planning Law Committee (2013) Submission on the state environmental planning policy (mining, petroleum production and extractive industries) amendment (resource significance), NSW young lawyers. Retrieved 15 Mar 2015. http://www.lawsociety.com.au/cs/groups/public/documents/internetyounglawyers/763290.pdf
Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/tsca1995323/
United Nations (2002). Report of the World summit on sustainable development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August 4 September. A/CONF.199/20, 20. Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www.un.org/jsummit/html/documents/summit_docs/131302_wssd_report_reissued.pdf
Walsh V (2014) The future of land and environment court oversight of major project offsets. Environ Plann Law J 31:397–412
Wathern P (1988) An introductory guide to EIA. In: Wathern P (ed) Environmental impact assessment theory and practice. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 3–30
WCED (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future (short “Brundtland-Report”), transmitted to the general assembly as an annex to UN Doc A/42/427 Part 2.1
Wilderness Act (1987) (NSW). Retrieved 20 Apr 2015. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/wa1987139/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riley, S. (2016). Prioritising the Environment in Sustainable Development: Lessons from Australian Environmental Impact Assessment. In: Mauerhofer, V. (eds) Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26019-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26021-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)