Advertisement

Judicial Control Over Acts of Administrative Omission: Environmental Rule of Law and Recent Case Law in Japan

  • Noriko OkuboEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Judicial control of administrative acts of omission is indispensable for ensuring sustainable development. Despite advancements of environmental legislation, deficient implementation is a serious problem in many countries. This issue grows in importance, especially because in the field of environmental law the executive branch is usually given considerable discretion as to how and when to exercise its regulatory power. This article analyses recent developments in case law on judicial control of administrative acts of omission in Japan. State liability cases and mandamus cases are typical measures for challenging omissions of public authorities. Recently, State liability lawsuits, such as Minamata and asbestos cases, have proven to be an effective measure to challenge the non-use of the regulatory power. Although such kind of lawsuit is a direct measure to compensate the victims, it also plays an important role as an indirect measure to push the government to exercise its regulatory power. The mandamus action is more a direct measure to control illegal failures. It is a new type of administrative litigation expected to demonstrate more effectiveness in the future.

Keywords

Access to justice Principle 10 Environmental rule of law State liability Mandamus action 

References

  1. ERCA—Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan (n.d.). Operation of the pollution-related health damage compensation system. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.erca.go.jp/erca/english/activities/ac_01.html
  2. Kubota Corporation (2006) Kubota’s response to the issue of Asbestos. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.kubota-global.net/csr/report_past/pdf/2006/p34.pdf
  3. Ministry of Environment (2011) Summary of countermeasures against Asbestos in Japan. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from https://www.env.go.jp/en/air/asbestos/summary_caa.pdf
  4. Okubo N (2005) Environmental policy instrument diversity. In: JEC—Japan Environmental Council (ed) The state of the environment in Asia 2005/2006. Springer, Tokyo, pp 337–348Google Scholar
  5. Okubo N (2015a) The development of the Japanese legal system for public participation in land use and environmental matters, Land Use Policy. Accepted 29 Dec 2014Google Scholar
  6. Okubo N (2015b) Principle 10 and developments in Asia. In: Ramos GE, Spitzkatz M (eds) Rule of law for good environmental governance. University of Cebu and Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, pp 154–168Google Scholar
  7. Osaka Lawyers Advocacy for the Victims of Asbestos Disease (2009) Serious health hazard of Asbestos in Sennan Area. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.asbestos-osaka1.sakura.ne.jp/english.html
  8. Osaka University (2015) Discussion papers and materials of Osaka University’s international workshop on ‘participation principle indicators under the environmental law: towards establishing international collaboration in pursuit of environmental justice’, held 9–10 March 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015, from http://greenaccess.law.osaka-u.ac.jp/english/resources/enworkshop2015march
  9. Pring G, Pring C (2009) Greening justice: creating and improving environmental courts and tribunals. The access initiative. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.accessinitiative.org/sites/default/files/Greening%20Justice%20FInal_31399_WRI_0.pdf
  10. Sakumoto N (2011) Development of Asian Environmental Law and the enforcement. Horitsu Ronso The Meiji Law Rev 83(2–3):205–223 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Ui J (1992) Minamata disease. In: Ui J (ed) Industrial pollution in Japan. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 103–132Google Scholar
  12. UN (2004) The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. Report of the Secretary-General (S/2004/616). Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/unga07/law.pdf
  13. UNEP (2013) Decision 27/1: new rules of procedure of the Governing Council Decision 27/9. In: Decisions adopted by the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its first universal session. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.unep.org/gc/gc27/docs/Decisisions_adopted_by_the_first_universal_session_(advance).pdf
  14. UNEP (2015) Environmental rule of law: critical to sustainable development. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.unep.org/delc/Portals/24151/Documents/issue-brief-environmental-justice-sdgs.pdf
  15. UNEP (n.d.) Environmental rule of law. Retrieved 15 June 2015, from http://www.unep.org/delc/worldcongress/Home/tabid/55710/Default.aspx

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Law and PoliticsOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations