Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Computational Music Analysis pp 31–56Cite as

The Harmonic Musical Surface and Two Novel Chord Representation Schemes

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate representation for chords is important for encoding pertinent harmonic aspects of the musical surface, and, at the same time, is crucial for building effective computational models for music analysis. This chapter, initially, addresses musicological, perceptual and computational aspects of the harmonic musical surface. Then, two novel general chord representations are presented: the first, the General Chord Type (GCT) representation, is inspired by the standard Roman numeral chord type labelling, but is more general and flexible so as to be applicable to any idiom; the second, the Directed Interval Class (DIC) vector, captures the intervallic content of a transition between two chords in a transposition-invariant idiom-independent manner. Musical examples and preliminary evaluations of both encoding schemes are given, illustrating their potential to form a basis for harmonic processing in the domain of computational musicology.

Keywords

  • Music Information Retrieval
  • Pitch Interval
  • Tonal Music
  • Pitch Class
  • Tonal Context

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bregman, A. S. (1994). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, E. M. (1999). Intervals, scales and tuning. In Deutsch, D., editor, The Psychology of Music, pages 215–264. Academic Press, second edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambouropoulos, E. (2008). Voice and stream: Perceptual and computational modeling of voice separation. Music Perception, 26(1):75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambouropoulos, E. (2010). The musical surface: Challenging basic assumptions. Musicae Scientiae, 14(2):131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambouropoulos, E. (2012). A directional interval class representation of chord transitions. In Proceedings of the Joint 12th International Conference for Music Perception and Cognition & 8th Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ICMPC-ESCOM 2012), Thessaloniki, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambouropoulos, E., Crochemore, M., Iliopoulos, C. S., Mouchard, L., and Pinzon, Y. J. (2002). Algorithms for computing approximate repetitions in musical sequences. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 79(11):1135–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambouropoulos, E., Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M., and Tsougras, C. (2014). An idiom-independent representation of chords for computational music analysis and generation. In Proceeding of the Joint 11th Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC) and 40th International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), ICMC–SMC 2014, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambouropoulos, E., Katsiavalos, A., and Tsougras, C. (2013). Idiom-independent harmonic pattern recognition based on a novel chord transition representation. In Proceedings of the 3rd InternationalWorkshop on Folk Music Analysis (FMA2013), Amsterdam, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cemgil, A. T., Kappen, H. J., and Barber, D. (2006). A generative model for music transcription. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 14(2):679–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, W. B., Veltkamp, R. C., and Wiering, F. (2008). Tonal pitch step distance: a similarity measure for chord progressions. In 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2008), pages 51–56, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, W. B., Wiering, F., and Veltkamp, R. C. (2013). A geometrical distance measure for determining the similarity of musical harmony. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 2(3):189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (2012). The processing of pitch combinations. In Deutsch, D., editor, The Psychology of Music, pages 249–326. Academic Press, third edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A. (1973). The Structure of Atonal Music. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S. (1989). Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harte, C., Sandler, M., Abdallah, S. A., and Gómez, E. (2005). Symbolic representation of musical chords: A proposed syntax for text annotations. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2005), pages 66–71, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L. and Datteri, D. L. (2001). Recognizing the component tones of a major chord. The American Journal of Psychology, 114(4):569–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huron, D. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception, 19(1):1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, W. and Knopoff, L. (1978). The acoustic component of Western consonance. Interface, 7(1):1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the Computational Mind. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. and Lerdahl, F. (2006). The capacity for music: What is it, and what’s special about it? Cognition, 100(1):33–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordanous, A. (2008). Voice separation in polyphonic music: A data-driven approach. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2008, Belfast, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M. and Cambouropoulos, E. (2014). Probabilistic harmonisation with fixed intermediate chord constraints. In Proceedings of the Joint 11th Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC) and 40th International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M., Katsiavalos, A., Tsougras, C., and Cambouropoulos, E. (2014). Harmony in the polyphonic songs of Epirus: Representation, statistical analysis and generation. In 4th International Workshop on Folk Music Analysis (FMA 2014), Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M., Zacharakis, A., Tsougras, C., and Cambouropoulos, E. (2015). Evaluating the General Chord Type algorithm in tonal music and organising its output in higher-level functional chord categories. In Proceedings of the 16th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR 2015), Malaga, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostka, S. and Payne, D. (1995). Tonal Harmony. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitz, S. G. (2012). The Complete Musician: An Integrated Approach to Tonal Theory, Analysis, and Listening. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (1959). Intervallic relations between two collections of notes. Journal of Music Theory, 3(2):298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (2001). Special cases of the interval function between pitch-class sets x and y. Journal of Music Theory, 45(1):1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (2007). Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, S. and Kellar, L. (1973). Categorical perception in a non-linguistic mode. Cortex, 9(4):355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauch, M., Cannam, C., Davies, M., Dixon, S., Harte, C., Kolozali, S., Tidhar, D., and Sandler, M. (2010). OMRAS2 metadata project 2009. In Proceedings of the 11 th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR 2010), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parncutt, R. (1989). Harmony: A Psychoacoustical Approach. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parncutt, R. (1994). Template-matching models of musical pitch and rhythm perception. Journal of New Music Research, 23(2):145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parncutt, R. (1997). A model of the perceptual root(s) of a chord accounting for voicing and prevailing tonality. In Leman, M., editor, Music, Gestalt, and Computing, volume 1317 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 181–199. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piston, W. (1978). Harmony. Norton. Revised and expanded by M. DeVoto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povel, D.-J. and Jansen, E. (2001). Perceptual mechanisms in music processing. Music Perception, 19(2):169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryynänen, M. P. and Klapuri, A. P. (2008). Automatic transcription of melody, bass line, and chords in polyphonic music. Computer Music Journal, 32(3):72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorlemmer, M., Smaill, A., Kühnberger, K.-U., Kutz, O., Colton, S., Cambouropoulos, E., and Pease, A. (2014). COINVENT: Towards a computational concept invention theory. In 5th International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC) 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, J. A. (1985). The Musical Mind. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Nelson, D. G., Grohskopf, L. A., and Appleton, T. (1994). What child is this? What interval was that? Familiar tunes and music perception in novice listeners. Cognition, 52(1):23–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temperley, D. (2001a). The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temperley, D. (2001b). Kostka–Payne dataset. Available online at http://theory.esm.rochester.edu/temperley/kp-stats/. Last accessed 5 September 2015.

  • Temperley, D. (2012). Computational models of music cognition. In Deutsch, D., editor, The Psychology of Music, pages 327–368. Academic Press, third edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tymoczko, D. (2011). A Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended Common Practice. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (1934). Auditory perception. I. The Gestalt approach. II. The evolutionary approach. British Journal of Psychology, 25:123–139, 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Music Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Emilios Cambouropoulos

Authors
  1. Emilios Cambouropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilios Cambouropoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Arch., Design & Media Tech, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    David Meredith

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cambouropoulos, E. (2016). The Harmonic Musical Surface and Two Novel Chord Representation Schemes. In: Meredith, D. (eds) Computational Music Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25931-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25931-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25929-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25931-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

search

Navigation