Abstract
In this chapter, we briefly outline the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model and Good Lives Model (GLM) of offender rehabilitation and review their empirical status and theoretical coherency. We further analyze the concept of dynamic risk factors and conclude that the RNR’s reliance on this problematic construct undermines its coherency as rehabilitation approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010a). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. L. (2010b). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. doi:10.1037/a0018362.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 735–755. doi:10.1177/0093854811406356.
Barnett, G. D., Manderville-Norden, R., & Rakestrow, J. (2014). The Good Lives Model or relapse prevention: What works better in facilitating change? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26(1), 3–33. doi:10.1177/1079063212474473.
Barnett, G., & Wood, J. L. (2008). Agency, relatedness, inner peace, and problemsolving in sexual offending: How sexual offenders prioritize and operationalize their good lives conceptions. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 444–465.
Beech, A.R., & Craig, L. (2012). The current status of static and dynamic factors in sexual offending risk assessment. Journal of Aggression and Peace Research, 4, 169–185.
Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31–63.
Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brouillette-Alarie, S., Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L. (in press). Latent constructs of the static-99R and static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment.
Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2015). Evolutionary criminology: Towards a comprehensive explanation of crime and its management. New York, NY: Academic.
Gannon, T. A., & Ward, T. (2014). Where has all the psychology gone? A critical review of evidence-based psychological practice in correctional settings. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 435–436. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.006.
Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1990). Tertiary prevention: What a meta-analysis of the offender treatment literature tells us about ‘what woks’. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 173–184.
Haig, B. D. (2014). Investigating the psychological world: Scientific method in the behavioural sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154.
Harkins, L., Flak, V. E., Beech, A., & Woodhams, J. (2012). Evaluation of a community-based sex offender treatment program using a Good Lives Model approach. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 519–543. doi:10.1177/1079063211429469.
Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–126.
Illari, P., & Russo, F. (2014). Causality: Philosophical theory meets scientific practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2011). Desistance and sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039.
Marshall, L. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2012). The risk/needs/responsivity model: The crucial features of general responsivity. In E. Bowen & S. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on evaluating criminal justice and corrections (Advances in program evaluation, Vol. 13, pp. 29–45). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., Serran, G. A., & O’Brien, M. D. (2011). Rehabilitating sexual offenders: A strength-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318–329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102–1114.
Purvis, M., Ward, T., & Shaw, S. (2013). Applying the Good Lives Model to the case management of sexual offenders. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
Russell, K., & Darjee, R. (2013). Managing the risk posed by personality-disordered sexual offenders in the community. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 88–114). Abingdon: Routledge.
Scoones, C., Willis, G. M., & Grace, R. C. (2012). Beyond static and dynamic risk factors: The incremental predictive validity of release planning in sex offender risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 222–238. doi:10.1177/0886260511416472.
Simons, D. A., McCullar, B., & Tyler, C. (2006). Evaluation of the Good Lives Model approach to treatment planning. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Association for the treatment of sexual abusers research and treatment and research, Chicago, IL
Thornton, D. (2013). Implications of our developing understanding of risk and protective factors in the treatment of adult male sexual offenders. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8, 62–65.
Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of sexual offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513–528.
Ward, T. (2014). The Explanation of sexual offending: From single factor theories to integrative pluralism. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 130–141.
Ward, T. (2015). The detection of dynamic risk factors and correctional factors. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 105–111.
Ward, T., & Beech, A. (2015). Dynamic risk factors: A theoretical dead-end? Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 100–113.
Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk assessment paradigm. London: Routledge.
Ward, T., Melser, J., & Yates, P. M. (2007). Reconstructing the Risk Need Responsivity Model: A Theoretical Elaboration and Evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 208–228.
Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 353–360. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.353.
Ward, T., Yates, P., & Willis, G. (2012). The good lives model and the risk need responsivity model: A critical response. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 94–110.
Willis, G. M., Ward, T., & Levenson, J. S. (2014). The Good Lives Model (GLM): An evaluation of GLM operationalization in North American treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 58–81. doi:10.1177/1079063213478202.
Willis, G. M., Yates, P. M., Gannon, T. A., & Ward, T. (2013). How to integrate the Good Lives Model into treatment programs for sexual offending: An introduction and overview. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 123–142. doi:10.1177/1079063212452618.
Wong, S. C. P., & Gordon, A. (2006). The validity and reliability of the violence risk scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 279–309. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.3.279.
Yates, P. M., Prescott, D. S., & Ward, T. (2010). Applying the Good Lives and Self Regulation Models to sex offender treatment: A practical guide for clinicians. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ward, T., Willis, G.M. (2016). Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors and Offender Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the Good Lives Model and the Risk-Need Model. In: Laws, D., O'Donohue, W. (eds) Treatment of Sex Offenders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25866-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25868-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)