Skip to main content

Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors and Offender Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the Good Lives Model and the Risk-Need Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter, we briefly outline the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model and Good Lives Model (GLM) of offender rehabilitation and review their empirical status and theoretical coherency. We further analyze the concept of dynamic risk factors and conclude that the RNR’s reliance on this problematic construct undermines its coherency as rehabilitation approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010a). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. L. (2010b). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. doi:10.1037/a0018362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 735–755. doi:10.1177/0093854811406356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G. D., Manderville-Norden, R., & Rakestrow, J. (2014). The Good Lives Model or relapse prevention: What works better in facilitating change? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26(1), 3–33. doi:10.1177/1079063212474473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G., & Wood, J. L. (2008). Agency, relatedness, inner peace, and problemsolving in sexual offending: How sexual offenders prioritize and operationalize their good lives conceptions. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 444–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, A.R., & Craig, L. (2012). The current status of static and dynamic factors in sexual offending risk assessment. Journal of Aggression and Peace Research, 4, 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brouillette-Alarie, S., Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L. (in press). Latent constructs of the static-99R and static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2015). Evolutionary criminology: Towards a comprehensive explanation of crime and its management. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, T. A., & Ward, T. (2014). Where has all the psychology gone? A critical review of evidence-based psychological practice in correctional settings. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 435–436. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1990). Tertiary prevention: What a meta-analysis of the offender treatment literature tells us about ‘what woks’. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B. D. (2014). Investigating the psychological world: Scientific method in the behavioural sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, L., Flak, V. E., Beech, A., & Woodhams, J. (2012). Evaluation of a community-based sex offender treatment program using a Good Lives Model approach. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 519–543. doi:10.1177/1079063211429469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illari, P., & Russo, F. (2014). Causality: Philosophical theory meets scientific practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, D. R., & Ward, T. (2011). Desistance and sex offending: Alternatives to throwing away the keys. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2012). The risk/needs/responsivity model: The crucial features of general responsivity. In E. Bowen & S. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on evaluating criminal justice and corrections (Advances in program evaluation, Vol. 13, pp. 29–45). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., Serran, G. A., & O’Brien, M. D. (2011). Rehabilitating sexual offenders: A strength-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318–329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, M., Ward, T., & Shaw, S. (2013). Applying the Good Lives Model to the case management of sexual offenders. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, K., & Darjee, R. (2013). Managing the risk posed by personality-disordered sexual offenders in the community. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 88–114). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, C., Willis, G. M., & Grace, R. C. (2012). Beyond static and dynamic risk factors: The incremental predictive validity of release planning in sex offender risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 222–238. doi:10.1177/0886260511416472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. A., McCullar, B., & Tyler, C. (2006). Evaluation of the Good Lives Model approach to treatment planning. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Association for the treatment of sexual abusers research and treatment and research, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D. (2013). Implications of our developing understanding of risk and protective factors in the treatment of adult male sexual offenders. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8, 62–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of sexual offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2014). The Explanation of sexual offending: From single factor theories to integrative pluralism. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2015). The detection of dynamic risk factors and correctional factors. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Beech, A. (2015). Dynamic risk factors: A theoretical dead-end? Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk assessment paradigm. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Melser, J., & Yates, P. M. (2007). Reconstructing the Risk Need Responsivity Model: A Theoretical Elaboration and Evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 208–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 353–360. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Yates, P., & Willis, G. (2012). The good lives model and the risk need responsivity model: A critical response. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. M., Ward, T., & Levenson, J. S. (2014). The Good Lives Model (GLM): An evaluation of GLM operationalization in North American treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 58–81. doi:10.1177/1079063213478202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. M., Yates, P. M., Gannon, T. A., & Ward, T. (2013). How to integrate the Good Lives Model into treatment programs for sexual offending: An introduction and overview. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 123–142. doi:10.1177/1079063212452618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. C. P., & Gordon, A. (2006). The validity and reliability of the violence risk scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 279–309. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.3.279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, P. M., Prescott, D. S., & Ward, T. (2010). Applying the Good Lives and Self Regulation Models to sex offender treatment: A practical guide for clinicians. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Ward Ph.D., Dip.Clin.Psyc., MNZCCP .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ward, T., Willis, G.M. (2016). Responsivity Dynamic Risk Factors and Offender Rehabilitation: A Comparison of the Good Lives Model and the Risk-Need Model. In: Laws, D., O'Donohue, W. (eds) Treatment of Sex Offenders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics