Skip to main content

Risk Formulation: The New Frontier in Risk Assessment and Management

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the structured professional judgement (SPJ) approach to the clinical risk assessment and management of men and women whose sexual behaviour is harmful to others. The SPJ approach promotes the use of clinical guidelines—such as the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol to help practitioners appraise the relevance of risk factors to the individual client and to create an understanding of that person’s risk potential, on the basis of which comprehensive and proportionate risk management plans can be prepared, implemented, evaluated, and repeatedly updated towards managed risk. This chapter makes the case that the most important part of the clinical risk assessment and management process using the SPJ approach is risk formulation—the process of generating an understanding of harmful behaviour that directly links assessment findings to management actions.

This chapter describes the SPJ approach to risk assessment and management and elaborates in detail on the essential risk formulation stage. Formulation is defined and guidance is given on its preparation and evaluation. A case study illustrates the process. This chapter concludes with a set of good practice recommendations for sexual violence risk assessment, formulation, and management.

Keywords

  • Risk formulation
  • Risk assessment
  • Risk management
  • Sexual offending
  • Structured professional judgement

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_4
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-25868-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 4.1

References

  • Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Wallace, H. M. (2002). Conquest by force: A narcissistic reactance theory of rape and sexual coercion. Review of General Psychology, 6, 92–135.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, P. J., & Kuyken, W. (2003). Is cognitive case formulation science or science fiction? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 52–69. doi:10.1093/clipsy.10.1.52.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society. (2009). Code of ethics and conduct. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouillette-Alarie, S., & Proulx, J. (2013). Predictive validity of the Static-99R and its dimensions. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19, 311–328.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chermack, T. J., & Lynham, S. A. (2002). Definitions and outcome variables of resource planning. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 366–383.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (3rd ed.). Vancouver, BC: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T. D. (2007). Psychotherapy case formulation: History and current status. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (2nd ed., pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T. D., Kendjelic, E. M., & Lucas, C. P. (1998). What is a case formulation? Development and use of a content coding manual. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 144–153.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2013). A UK cost-benefit analysis of Circles of Support and Accountability interventions. Sexual Abuse, 25, 211–229.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2013). Quantifying the relative risk of sex offenders risk ratios for Static-99R. Sexual Abuse, 25, 482–515.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare psychopathy checklist-revised: Technical manual (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Cormier, C. A. (2015). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group vs individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 60–65.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–126.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K. (2001). Risk assessment and risk management: Towards an integration. Plenary session delivered at the International Conference, Violence Risk Assessment and Management: Bringing Science and Practice Closer Together. Sundsvall, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L. (2013). Using formulation in teams. In L. Johnstone & R. Dallos (Eds.), Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds.). (2013). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., Benekos, P. J., & Merlo, A. V. (2015). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, D. A., Olver, M. E., Harris, M., Wong, S. C., & Bradford, J. M. (2015). The relationship between mental disorder and recidivism in sexual offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14, 10–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kraanen, F. L., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2011). Substance misuse and substance use disorders in sex offenders: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 478–489.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. (2013). Risk assessment: Specialist interviewing skills for forensic practitioners. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. (2014). The HCR-20 Version 3: A case study in risk formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 172–180.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C., & Johnstone, L. (2013). (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C., & Hird, J. (2014). Psychopathy and sexual offending. In D. T. Wilcox, T. Garrett, & L. Harkins (Eds.), Sex offender treatment: A case study approach to issues and interventions. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C., Nathan, R., & Brown, A. (2011). Formulation in clinical risk assessment and management. In R. W. Whittington & C. Logan (Eds.), Self-harm and Violence: Towards best practice in managing risk (pp. 187–204). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loranger, A. (1999). International personality disorder examination manual: DSM-IV module. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M. (1996). The confluence model of sexual aggression: Feminist and evolutionary perspectives. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 269–295). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook or sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 257–275). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. L. (1989). Invited essay: Intimacy, loneliness and sexual offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 491–503.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. L., Fernandez, Y. M., Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (Eds.). (2013). Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K., Kemshall, H., Westwood, S., Solle, J., MacKenzie, G., Cattel, J., & Pollard, A., (2014). Circles of support and accountability (CoSA): A case file review of two pilots. Project Report. England: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurran, M.M., & Bruford, S., (2016). Case formulation quality checklist: A revision based upon clinicians’ views. Journal of Forensic Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurran, M., Logan, C., & Hart, S. (2012). Case formulation quality checklist. Nottingham: Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the literature. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson (Original work published in 1954.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minoudis, P., Craissati, J., Shaw, J., McMurran, M. M., Freestone, M., Chuan, S. J., & Leonard, A., (2013). An evaluation of case formulation training and consultation with probation officers. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23, 252–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minoudis, P., Shaw, J., & Craissati, J. (2012). The London Pathways Project: Evaluating the effectiveness of a consultation model for personality disordered offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 22, 218–232.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mossman, D. (2006). Critique of pure risk assessment or, Kant meets Tarasoff. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 75, 523–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossman, D. (2015). From group data to useful probabilities: The relevance of actuarial risk assessment in individual instances. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 43, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (Eds.). (1989). Clinical decision-making in behavior therapy: A problem-solving perspective. Champaign, IL: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., & Douglas, K. S. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of violence risk assessment tools. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B. (1989). Cognitive therapy in practice: A case formulation approach. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phenix, A., Helmus, L., & Hanson, R. K. (2012). Static-99R & Static-2002R evaluatorsworkbook. Retrieved from http://www.static99.org/pdfdocs/Static-99RandStatic-2002R_EvaluatorsWorkbook-Jan2015.pdf.

  • Reid, W. H., & Thorne, S. A. (2007). Personality disorders and violence potential. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 13, 261–268.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Lang, C. (2013). Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: The violence risk appraisal guide—Revised (VRAG-R). Psychological Assessment, 25, 951.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturmey, P., & McMurran, M. (Eds.). (2011). Forensic case formulation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrier, N. (2006). Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, K. (1994). Probabilistic planning and scenario planning. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 549–572). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerasekera, P. (1996). Multiperspective case formulation: A step toward treatment integration. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Logan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Logan, C. (2016). Risk Formulation: The New Frontier in Risk Assessment and Management. In: Laws, D., O'Donohue, W. (eds) Treatment of Sex Offenders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25868-3_4

Download citation