Abstract
Whilst global awareness of the importance and urgency of acting to mitigate climate change and its impacts is generally high, actual behaviour has matched neither the scale nor the complex nature of the challenge. Understanding why despite good intentions appropriate action is not forthcoming is critical if we wish to avoid catastrophic consequences for social justice and the wellbeing of humans and other species. Research gaining insight into underlying psychosocial processes has an important contribution to make in this regard, yet it tends to be overlooked.
This paper draws on an empirical interdisciplinary study enquiring into the experience of individuals acting to influence the organisation with regard to environmental decision-making. The study investigated psychosocial factors that may influence motivation, resilience and effectiveness, specifically psychological threat coping strategies, innate psychological needs, identity salience and ways of conceptualising experience.
Our study illuminates the complex nonlinear dynamics between these psychosocial forces, and reveals tensions in satisfying needs, and in the effectiveness of coping strategies such as suppressing ‘deep green’ identity, suppressing negative emotion about climate change, and in going into nature places.
The findings contribute nuanced insight to the body of knowledge about the dynamics of underlying psychosocial forces that influence approaches to climate change and other pro-environmental behaviours.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychological Association (2009) Psychology and global climate change: addressing a multifaceted phenomenon and set of challenges (report). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Blackmore E, Holmes T (2013) Common cause for nature: values and frames in conservation (report). Public Interest Research Centre, Powys
Clayton S, Opotow S (2003) Identity and the natural environment: the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, Cambridge
Crompton T, Kasser T (2009) Meeting environmental challenges: the role of human identity. WWF-UK, Godalming
Darnton A, Kirk M (2011) Finding frames: new ways to engage the UK public in global poverty. Bond, London
DECC (2013) 2012 UK greenhouse gas emissions. Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK
Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11:227–268
Energy Saving Trust (2011) The elephant in the living room: how our appliances and gadgets are trampling the green dream. Energy Saving Trust, London
Foster J (2015) After sustainability. Routledge, London
Grouzet FM et al (2005) The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 89(5):800–816
Jenkins J et al (2011) Energy emergence: rebound and backfire as emergent phenomena. Breakthrough Institute, Oakland
Kasser T, Kanner AD (eds) (2004) Psychology and consumer culture: the struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Klein N (2014) This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. Simon & Schuster, New York
Lakoff G (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ Commun 4(1):70–81
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Macy J (1993) World as lover, world as self. Parallax Press, Berkeley
Macy J, Brown M (2014) Coming back to life. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island
Maio G et al (2001) Addressing discrepancies between values and behaviour. J Exp Soc Psychol 37:104–117
Palazzo G, Krings F, Hoffrage U (2012) Ethical blindness. J Bus Ethics 109(3):323–338
Rockstrom J (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475
Rogelberg SG (ed) (2006) Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology. Sage, London
Schultz PW, Tabanico J (2007) Self, identity and the natural environment. J App Soc Psychol 37(6):1219–1247
Schultz PW et al (2005) Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behaviour. J Cross-Cult Psychol 36(4):457–475
Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65
Shapiro SL, Schwartz GER (1999) Intentional systemic mindfulness: an integrative model for self-regulation and health. Adv Mind-Body Med 15:128–134
Smith J et al (2009) Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Sage, London
Thibodeau PH, Boroditsky L (2011) Metaphors we think with. PLoS One 6(2):e16782
van der Werff E et al (2013) The value of environmental self-identity. J Environ Psychol 34:55–63
Weintrobe S (ed) (2013) Engaging with climate change: psychoanalytic and interdisciplinary perspective. Routledge, London
Wright C et al (2012) Hippies on the third floor. Org Stud 33(11):1451–1475
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrews, N., Walker, S., Fahy, K. (2016). Between Intention and Action: Psychosocial Factors Influencing Action on Climate Change in Organisations. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Innovation in Climate Change Adaptation. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25814-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25814-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25812-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25814-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)