International Conference on Statistical Language and Speech Processing

Statistical Language and Speech Processing pp 39-49 | Cite as

Discourse Particles in French: Prosodic Parameters Extraction and Analysis

  • Mathilde Dargnat
  • Katarina Bartkova
  • Denis Jouvet
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9449)

Abstract

Detecting the correct syntactic function of a word is of great importance for language and speech processing. The semantic load of a word is different whether its function is a discourse particle or a preposition. Words having the function of a discourse particle (DP) are very frequent in spontaneous speech and their discursive function is often expressed only by prosodic means. Our study analyses some prosodic correlates of two French words (quoi, voilà), used as discourse particles or pronoun (quoi) or preposition (voilà). Our goal is to determine to what extent intrinsic and contextual prosodic properties characterize DP and non-DP functions. Prosodic parameters are analyzed with respect to the DP or non-DP function for these words extracted from large speech corpora. A preliminary test concerning the automatic detection of the word function is also carried out using prosodic parameters only, leading to an encouraging result of 70 % correct identification.

Keywords

Part-of-speech tagging Prosody Discourse particles  Discourse structure Automatic prosodic annotation 

References

  1. 1.
    Aijmer, K.: Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartkova, K., Dargnat, M.: Pardi!: Particules discursives: sens et corrélats prosodiques, ATILF Research Project (2014–2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartkova, K., Delais-Roussarie, E., Santiago, F.: Prosotran: a tool to annotate prosodically non-standard data. In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2012, Shangaï. pp. 55–58 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartkova, K., Jouvet, D.: Automatic detection of the prosodic structures of speech utterances. In: Železný, M., Habernal, I., Ronzhin, A. (eds.) SPECOM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8113, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beeching, K.: La co-variation des marqueurs discursifs bon, c’est-à-dire, enfin, hein, quand même, quoi et si vous voulez: une question d’identité ? Langue Française 154, 78–93 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brémond, C.: Les “petites marques du discours”. Le cas du marqueur méta-discursif bon en français. Ph.D. thesis, Dpt. of Linguistics, Universitéde Provence (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruxelles, S., Traverso, V.: Usages de la particule ‘voilà’ dans une réunion de travail: analyse multimodale. In: Drescher, M., Job, B. (eds.) Les marqueurs discursifs dans les langues romanes: approches théoriques et méthodologiques, pp. 71–92. Peter Lang, Bern (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chanet, C.: 1700 occurrences de la particule quoi en français parlé contemporain: approches de la “distribution” et des fonctions en discours. Marges Linguistiques 2, 52–80 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dargnat, M.: Marqueurs de discours et interjections. In: Abeillé, A., Godard, D. (eds.) La Grande Grammaire du Français. Actes Sud, Arles (2016), to appearGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Degand, L., Fagard, B.: Alors between discourse and grammar: the role of syntactic position. Funct. Lang. 18, 19–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Degand, L., Simon, A.: L’analyse des unités discursives de base: pourquoi et comment? Langue Française 170, 45–59 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Denturck, E.: Étude des marqueurs discursifs, l’exemple de quoi. Master’s thesis, Taal-en-Letterkunde, Universiteit Gent (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dostie, G.: Pragmaticalisation Et Marqueurs Discursifs: Analyse Sémantique Et Traitement Lexicographique. De Boeck-Duculot, Bruxelles (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dostie, G., Pusch, C.: Les marqueurs discursifs. présentation. Langue Française 154, 3–12 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez-Vest, J.: Les particules énonciatives dans la construction du discours. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fraser, B.: What are discourse markers? J. Pragmatics 37, 931–952 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardent, C.: Syfrap project (syntaxe du français parlé), LORIA-ATILF-LLF Research Project (2011–2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grevisse, M., Goose, A.: Le Bon Usage, 14th edn. De Boeck-Duculot, Bruxelles (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1) (2009). http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/index.html
  20. 20.
    Hirschberg, J., Litman, D.: Empirical studies on desambiguisation of cue phrases. Comput. Linguist. 19, 501–530 (1993)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horne, M.P., Hansson, P., Bruce, G., Frid, J., Filipsson, M.: Cue words and the topic structure of spoken discourse: the case of Swedish men. J. Pragmatics 33, 1061–1081 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lefeubvre, F., Morel, M.A., Teston-Bonnard, S.: Valeurs prototypiques de quoi à travers ses usages en français oral, unpublished MS., Archives ouvertes HAL-SHS (2013). https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00840728
  23. 23.
    Martin, P.: Quoi peut être dedans ou dehors du noyau macro-syntaxique, quoi. Unpublished (2014), handout Journée Pardi!, ATILF, Nancy, 18–19 December 2014Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mosegaard Hansen, M.B.: The Function of Discourse Particles. A study with Special reference to Spoken Standard French. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paillard, D.: Les mots du discours comme mots de langu. Le Gré des Langues 14, 10–41 (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shiffrin, D.: Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In: Shiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 54–75. Blackwell, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teston-Bonnard, S.: Propriétés topologiques et distributionnelles des constituants non régis. Ph.D. thesis, Dpt. of Linguistics, Université de Provence (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vincent, D.: Les ponctuants de la langue et autres mots du discours. Nuits Blanches, Québec (1993)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wichmann, A., Simon-Vandenbergen, A.A., Aijmer, K.: How prosody reflects semantic change: a synchronic case study of course. In: Davidse, K., Vandelanotte, L., Cuyckens, H. (eds.) Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, pp. 103–154. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathilde Dargnat
    • 1
  • Katarina Bartkova
    • 1
  • Denis Jouvet
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Université de Lorraine & CNRS, ATILF, UMR 7118Nancy CedexFrance
  2. 2.Speech GroupInria, LORIAVillers-lès-NancyFrance
  3. 3.Université de Lorraine, LORIA, UMR 7503Villers-lès-NancyFrance
  4. 4.CNRS, LORIA, UMR 7503Villers-lès-NancyFrance

Personalised recommendations