Advertisement

Reuse of Simulated Cases in Teaching Enterprise Modelling

  • Ilia Bider
  • Martin Henkel
  • Stewart Kowalski
  • Erik Perjons
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9382)

Abstract

Case-based teaching/learning is widely used in Information Systems (IS) education in general, and in teaching/learning modeling, in particular. A case presents to the students a real or imaginary business situation asking them to build a model of it, or showing how such model can be built. In situations where a business case is presented in a text form, reusing it as is, or with modification in the same or a different course does not constitute much of a problem. However, using textual description for presenting cases has drawbacks on its own, as it does not help the students to acquire the skills of dissecting analyzing and analyzing the reality when building a model. The latter can be better achieved when a case is presented in a multimedia form, e.g. recorded interviews, website of a company, etc. As the previous works of the same authors show, such case presentations gives the students better understanding of the essence of modeling, which is appreciated by the students. The dark side of the multimedia presentation is that such a case presentation requires more time to build compared to using a textual form, and it is not easy to change it. This paper is a preliminary inquiry into the problem of reusing of cases presented with the help of multimedia. It presents a conceptual model of the domain aimed at discussing the potential of reuse of the whole case or its parts, and concludes with considerations on reusability that need to be covered when building multimedia presentations of cases.

Keywords

Case based learning Modeling skills Information systems IS Simulation Education Multi-media Reuse 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The project was sponsored by Stockholm University’s program “Future Learn”. The authors are grateful to our colleagues Jelena Zdravkovic and Anders Thelemyr who participated in interview recording.

References

  1. 1.
    Bezivin, J., France, R., Gogolla, M., Haugen, O., Taentzer, G., Varro, D.: Teaching modeling: why, when, what? In: Ghosh, S. (ed.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 6002, pp. 55–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engels, G., Hausmann, J.H., Lohmann, M., Sauer, S.: Teaching UML is teaching software engineering is teaching abstraction. In: Bruel, J.-M. (ed.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3844, pp. 306–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fenstermacher, K.D.: If I had a Model, I’d Model in the Morning. In: Proceeding of OOPSL 2004, pp. 88–89 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Polanyi, M.S.: Knowing and Being. University of Chicago, Chicago (1969)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCune, V., Hounsell, D.: The development of students’ ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses. High. Educ. 49(3), 255–289 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bider, I., Henkel, M., Kowalski, S., Perjons, E.: Teaching enterprise modeling based on multi-media simulation: a pragmatic approach. In: Proceedings of the 6th MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies. LNBIP, vol. 209, pp. 239–254. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bider, L., Henkel, M., Kowalski, S., Perjons, E.: Simulating apprenticeship using multimedia in higher education: a case from the information systems field. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 12(2), 137–154 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costain, G., McKenna, B.: Experiencing the elicitation of user requirements and recording them in use case diagrams through role play. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 22(4), 368–382 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: Teaching business process modelling: experiences and recommendations. Commun. AIS 25, 379–394 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ellaway, R., Poulton, T., Fors, U., McGee, J.B., Albright, S.: Building a virtual patient commons. Med. Teach. 30, 170–174 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jesukiewicz, P.: Sharable content object reference model (SCORM), 4th Edition Content Aggregation Model, Advanced Distributed Learning (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maíllo, M.F.V., Rodríguez-Artacho, M.: Modeling educational content: the cognitive approach of the PALO language. Educ. Technol. Soc. 7(3), 124–137 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, L., Tono, D.: Learning objects: implications for instructional designers. Int. J. Instr. Media 38(3), 253–260 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IEEE, IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, IEEE Std 1484.12.1-2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agrawal, M., Banchuen, R., DiBiase, T., Gahegan, D.: Building rich, semantic descriptions of learning activities to facilitate reuse in digital libraries. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 7(1–2), 81–97 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilia Bider
    • 1
  • Martin Henkel
    • 1
  • Stewart Kowalski
    • 1
  • Erik Perjons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations