Advertisement

Towards the Derivation of Secure Business Process Designs

  • Nikolaos Argyropoulos
  • Haralambos Mouratidis
  • Andrew Fish
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9382)

Abstract

Security is a critical aspect of business processes that organisations utilise to achieve their goals. Current works on secure business process design mainly focus on annotating existing process models with security related concepts. Meanwhile, little attention is given to the rationale and the alignment of such security choices to high-level organisational security goals. To that end, a goal-to-process transformation approach, with a clear security orientation, is introduced, as part of a wider framework. This transformation process, presented through an illustrative example, uses Secure Tropos goal models as an input to create intermediate, security-annotated process skeletons. These can be then refined, through a series of manual tasks, to create secure BPMN process models.

Keywords

Business process modelling Business process security Secure tropos BPMN Process derivation Goal-to-process transformation 

References

  1. 1.
    Mellado, D., Fernández-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: A common criteria based security requirements engineering process for the development of secure information systems. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 29(2), 244–253 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altuhhova, O., Matulevičius, R., Ahmed, N.: Towards definition of secure business processes. In: Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 112, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leitner, M., Miller, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: An Analysis and evaluation of security aspects in the business process model and notation. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. IEEE Press, pp. 262–267 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neubauer, T., Klemen, M., Biffl, S.: Secure business process management: a roadmap. In: 1st IEEE International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Vienna, Austria. IEEE Press, pp. 457–464 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pavlovski, C.J., Zou, J.: Non-functional requirements in business process modeling. In: 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, vol. 79, Wollongong, Australia, pp. 103–112 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Decreus, K., Poels, G.: A goal-oriented requirements engineering method for business processes. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 29–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ko, R.K., Lee, S.S., Lee, E.W.: Business process management (BPM) standards: a survey. Bus. Process Manage. 15(5), 744–791 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-driven design and configuration management of business processes. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horkoff, J., Li, T., Li, F.L., Salnitri, M., Cardoso, E., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Pimentel, J.A.: Taking goal models downstream: a systematic roadmap. In: 8th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. IEEE Press, pp. 1–12 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koliadis, G., Ghose, A.K.: Relating business process models to goal-oriented requirements models in KAOS. In: Hoffmann, A., Kang, B.-H., Richards, D., Tsumoto, S. (eds.) PKAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4303, pp. 25–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghose, A.K., Narendra, N.C., Ponnalagu, K., Panda, A., Gohad, A.: Goal-driven business process derivation. In: Kappel, G., Maamar, Z., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R. (eds.) Service Oriented Computing. LNCS, vol. 7084, pp. 467–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Busetta, P.: Requirements-driven verification of Web services. Electr. Notes Theo. Comput. Sci. 105, 95–108 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guizzardi, R.S., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.A.P.A., Cardoso, E.: Bridging the gap between goals, agents and business processes. In: 4th International i* Workshop, CEUR, pp. 46–51 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bleistein, S.J., Cox, K., Verner, J., Phalp, K.T.: Requirements engineering for e-business advantage. Require. Eng. 11, 4–16 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lo, A., Yu, E.: From business models to service-oriented design: a reference catalog approach. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 87–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruiz, M., Costal, D., España, S., Franch, X., Pastor, Ó.: Integrating the goal and business process perspectives in information system analysis. In: Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Quix, C., Rolland, C., Manolopoulos, Y., Mouratidis, H., Horkoff, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 332–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Séguran, M., Hébert, C., Frankova, G.: Secure workflow development from early requirements analysis. In: The 6th European Conference on Web Services. IEEE, pp. 125–134 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paja, E., Giorgini, P., Paul, S., Meland, P.H.: Security requirements engineering for secure business processes. In: Niedrite, L., Strazdina, R., Wangler, B. (eds.) BIR Workshops 2011. LNBIP, vol. 106, pp. 77–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salnitri, M., Giorgini, P.: Transforming socio-technical security requirements in SecBPMN security policies. In: 7th International i* Workshop, Thessaloniki, Greece, CEUR (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Decreus, K., Snoeck, M., Poels, G.: Practical challenges for methods transforming i* goal models into business process models. In: IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. IEEE Press, pp. 15–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leitner, M., Schefer-Wenzl, S., Rinderle-Ma, S., Strembeck, M.: An experimental study on the design and modeling of security concepts in business processes. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M., Zdravkovic, J., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 165, pp. 236–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ahmed, N., Matulevicius, R.: A taxonomy for assessing security in business process modelling. In: 7th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. IEEE Press, pp. 1–10 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0. Technical report, January 2011Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: A BPMN extension for the modeling of security requirements in business processes. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E90–D(4), 745–752 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salnitri, M., Dalpiaz, F., Giorgini, P.: Modeling and verifying security policies in business processes. In: Bider, I., Gaaloul, K., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, H.A., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPMDS 2014 and EMMSAD 2014. LNBIP, vol. 175, pp. 200–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brucker, A.D., Hang, I., Lückemeyer, G., Ruparel, R.: SecureBPMN: modeling and enforcing access control requirements in business processes. In: The 17th ACM symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. ACM, pp. 123–126 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wolter, C., Schaad, A.: Modeling of task-based authorization constraints in BPMN. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 64–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braun, R., Esswein, W.: Classification of domain-specific BPMN extensions. In: Frank, U., Loucopoulos, P., Pastor, Ó., Petrounias, I. (eds.) PoEM 2014. LNBIP, vol. 197, pp. 42–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    van der Aalst, W.M.: Business process management : a comprehensive survey. ISRN Softw. Eng. 2013, 1–37 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: current issues and future challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leitner, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: A systematic review on security in process-aware information systems - constitution, challenges, and future directions. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(3), 273–293 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mouratidis, H., Giorgini, P.: Secure tropos: a security-oriented extension of the tropos methodology. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 17(2), 285–309 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pavlidis, M., Islam, S., Mouratidis, H.: A CASE tool to support automated modelling and analysis of security requirements. In: Nurcan, S. (ed.) IS Olympics: Information Systems in a Diverse World, pp. 95–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaos Argyropoulos
    • 1
  • Haralambos Mouratidis
    • 1
  • Andrew Fish
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations