Skip to main content
View expanded cover

Dance Notations and Robot Motion pp 209–235Cite as

Dynamic Coordination Patterns in Tango Argentino: A Cross-Fertilization of Subjective Explication Methods and Motion Capture

Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR,volume 111)

Abstract

This contribution surveys strategies for analyzing highly coordinated forms of collaborative dance improvisation, based on tango argentino. Specifically, we take interest (a) in micro-coordination at the <1 s timescale in dance elements such as steps or rotations, (b) in meso-scale patterns of 2–8 step “figures”, and (c) in general enabling macro-patterns maintained throughout, a kind of “grammar” of tango. Across these timescales, dancers supply individual action-readiness, dynamic stability, proper form and connectivity, while jointly “managing” structures of interpersonal coordination such as enabling configurations. Our study engages qualitative and quantitative methods in a dialogue. Starting with micro-genetic elicitation interviews, dancers reported ideomotor concepts, perceptual triggers, and didactic imagery. Besides general (e.g. postural) habits, task-specific forms or techniques, and attentional foci, this yields insights into the interlocking contributions and information flow between tango leaders and followers within units as small as half-steps. The subjective data was then “frontloaded” into a motion-capture study in which six expert couples, fitted with 2 × 21 light-point reflectors, executed various tango techniques. We developed kinematic indicators for individual and interpersonal coordination (degree of coupling, relative movement onset and action timing, role specifics); we also measured geometries underlying various tango tasks and style variations. The combined data suggests a micro-coordination model where dynamic interdependencies enable precise mutually adaptive action. The criss-crossing signals, e.g. when the increasing lability of the leader’s torso triggers the follower’s leg extension at the beginning of a forward step, suggests task-, phase- and body-part specific contingencies whereby leaders and followers micro-coordinate actions with respect to one another.

Keywords

  • Weight Shift
  • Informational Model
  • Interpersonal Coordination
  • Resonance Loop
  • Argentine Tango

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_10
  • Chapter length: 27 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-25739-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Notes

  1. 1.

    Qualitative studies include mother-child interaction [10, 33, 40, 53], collaborative creativity [35, 36], music ensembles [39], flamenco [25], theater improvisation [26], bodywork [22], and psychotherapy [16]. Dynamic systems researchers and scholars of interpersonal synergies have applied quantitative interpersonal coordination measures (cf. [7, 29, 34]). Examples include rugby, basketball, and futsal [4, 30, 48], horseback riding [23, 31], jazz [38, 49] and workplace teams [41].

  2. 2.

    Dynamic systems theorists might speak of order parameters that remain stable over time (as opposed to the more specific patterning of transient “movemes”). Order parameters designate collective variables that best represent the macroscopic patterns arising from non-linear interactions and synergies of lower-level components.

  3. 3.

    This is a figure in which the follower orbits around the leader, using side-, forward-, side- and backsteps in succession.

References

  1. D.K. Arvind, A. Valtazanos, Speckled tango dancers: real-time motion capture of two-body interactions using on-body wireless sensor networks. IEEE Comput. Soc., pp. 312–317 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.L. Berkowitz, The Improvising Mind. Cognition and Creativity in the Musical Moment (Oxford UP, Oxford, 2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Bernstein, The coordination and regulation of movements (Pergamon, London, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bourbousson, C. Sève, T. McGarry, Space–time coordination dynamics in basketball: Part 2. The interaction between the two teams. J. Sports Sci. 28, 349–358 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Castro, Tango Awareness (Buenos Aires, self-published, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Clark, Supersizing the Mind. Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension (Oxford UP, Oxford, 2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Dale, R. Fusaroli, N.D. Duran, D.C. Richardson, The self-organization of human interaction, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, ed. by B.H. Ross (Elsevier Inc., Academic Press, 2014), pp. 43–96

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Fantasia, H. De Jaegher, A. Fasulo, We can work it out: an enactive look at cooperation. Front. Psychol. 5(874), 1–11 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Fogel, Developing Through Relationships. Origins of Communication, Self, and Culture (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Fogel, A. Garvey, H.-C. Hsu, D. West-Stroming, Change Processes in Relationships: A Relational-Historical Research Approach (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Froese, T. Fuchs, The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenol. Cognit. Sci. 11, 205–235 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Froese, C. Gould, A. Barrett, Re-viewing from within. A commentary on first- and second-person methods in the science of consciousness. Constr. Found. 6, 254–269 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Fuchs, H. DeJaegher, Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenol. Cognit. Sci. 8, 465–486 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Gallagher, Phenomenology and experimental design. J. Conscious. Stud. 10, 85–99 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Haken, G. Schiepek, Synergetik in der Psychologie: Selbstorganisation verstehen und gestalten (Hofgrefe, Göttingen, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Ibanez-Gijon, A. Diaz, L.M.D. Lobo, On the ecological approach to information and control for roboticists. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 10(265), 1–11 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Kelso, Dynamic patterns (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Kimmel, Intersubjectivity at close quarters: shared, distributed, and superindividual imagery in tango argentino. Cognit. Semiot. 4, 76–124 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Kimmel, A cognitive theory of joint improvisation: the case of tango argentino, in Handbook of Dance Improvisation, ed. by V. Midgelow (Oxford UP, Oxford, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Kimmel, Sensorimotor and interaction management skills in tango argentino, in Out for a Walk, ed. by F. Engel, S. Marienberg, P. Schneider. Das Entgegenkommende Denken (Berlin, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Kimmel, C. Irran, M. Luger, Bodywork as systemic and inter-enactive competence: Participatory process management in Feldenkrais Method® & Zen Shiatsu. Front. Psychol. 5(1424), 1–23 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Lagarde, C. Peham, T. Licka, S. Kelso, Coordination dynamics of the horse-rider system. J. Mot. Behav. 37, 418–424 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Lavelli, A.P. Pantoja, H. Hsu, D. Messinger, A. Fogel, Using microgenetic designs to study change processes, in Handbook of Research Methods in Developmental Science, ed. by D. Teti (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, 2006) pp. 40–65

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Maduell, A. Wing, The dynamics of ensemble: the case for flamenco. Psychol. Music 35, 591–627 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Magerko, W. Manzoul, M. Riedle, A. Baumer, D. Fuller, K. Luther, C. Pearce, An empirical study of cognition and theatrical improvisation, in Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 117–126 (ACM, New York, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Noy, E. Dekel, U. Alon, The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 20947–20952 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. B. Olszewski, El Cuerpo del Baile: the kinetic and social fundaments of tango. Body Soc. 14(2), 62–81 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. O. Oullier, S. Kelso, Social coordination from the perspective of coordination dynamics, in Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Sciences, ed. by R.A. Meyers (Springer, Berlin, 2009), pp. 8198–8212

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Passos, D. Araújo, K. Davids, L. Gouveia, S. Serpa, Interpersonal dynamics in sport: The role of artificial neural networks and 3-D analysis. Behav. Res. Methods 38, 683–691 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Peham, T. Licka, H. Schobesberger, E. Meschan, Influence of the rider on the variability of the equine gait. Hum. Mov. Sci. 23, 663–671 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. C. Petitmengin, Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: an interview method for the science of conciousness. Phenomenol. Cognit. Sci. 5(3–4), 229–269 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Rączaszek-Leonardi, I. Nomikou, K.J. Rohlfing, Young children’s dialogical actions: The beginnings of purposeful intersubjectivity. IEEE Trans. Autonomous Mental Dev. 5, 210–221 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. M.A. Riley, M.J. Richardson, K. Shockley, V.C. Ramenzoni, Interpersonal synergies. Front. Psychol. 2(38), 1–7 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. Sawyer, Group Creativity. Music, Theater, Collaboration. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. Sawyer, Individual and group creativity, in The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, ed. by J.C. Kaufman, R.J. Sternberg (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 2012), pp. 366–394

    Google Scholar 

  37. T. Schack. Building blocks and architecture of dance, in The Neurocognition of Dance. Mind, Movement and Motor Skills, ed. by B. Bläsing, M. Puttke, T. Schack (Psychology Press, Hove & New York, 2010) pp. 11–40

    Google Scholar 

  38. B. Schögler, Studying temporal co-ordination in jazz duets. Musicae scientiae 3(1), suppl 75–91 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. F. Seddon, M. Biasutti, A comparison of modes of communication between members of a string quartet and a jazz sextet. Psychol. Music 37, 395–415 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  40. D.N. Stern, The interpersonal world of the infant: a view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology (Basic Books, New York, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  41. R.H. Stevens, J.C. Gorman, Mapping cognitive attractors onto the dynamic landscapes of teamwork. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 678, 366–375 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  42. L. Tateo, The dialogical dance: self, identity construction, positioning and embodiment in tango dancers. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 48, 299–321 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  43. S. Torrance, T. Froese, An inter-enactive approach to agency: participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality. Humana Mente 15, 21–53 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. M.T. Turvey, C. Carello, Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 366, 3123–3132 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  45. F. van Alphen, Tango and enactivism: first steps in exploring the dynamics and experience of interaction. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 48, 322–331 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. F.J. Varela, J. Shear, The View from Within. First Person Approaches to the Study of Consciousness (Imprint Academic, Bowling Green, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  47. P. Vermersch, L’Entretien d’ explicitation en formation continue et initiale (ESF, Paris, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  48. L. Vilar, D. Araújo, K. Davids, V. Correia, P.T. Esteves, Spatial-temporal constraints on decision-making during shooting performance in the team sport of futsal. J. Sports Sci. 31, 840–846 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  49. A.E. Walton, M.J. Richardson, P. Langland-Hassan, A. Chemero, Improvisation and the self-organization of multiple musical bodies. Front. Psychol. 6(313), 1–9 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  50. W.H. Warren, The dynamics of perception and action. Psychol. Rev. 113, 358–389 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  51. D.M. Wolpert, K. Doya, M. Kawato, A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 593–602 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  52. C.M. Zeitz, Some concrete advantages of abstraction: how experts’ representations facilitate reasoning, in Expertise in Context: Human and Machine, ed. by P. Feltovich, K.M. Ford, R. Hoffman (AAAI, MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1997), pp. 43–65

    Google Scholar 

  53. P. Zukow-Goldring, Assisted imitation: affordances, effectivities, and the mirror system in early language development, in Action to Language Via the Mirror Neuron System, ed. by M.A. Arbib (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, MA, 2006), pp. 469–500

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by FWF grants P-19436 and P-23067. We wish to thank Mario Heller and Arnold Baca for assistance with organizing and setting up the motion capture study. We also thank the six teacher couples who participated in the motion capture study and our numerous interviewees. Finally, we express our gratitude towards Germano Milite and Betka Fislova for the photographic stills and for their generous support throughout the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cognitive Science Platform, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Michael Kimmel

  2. Institute of Sport Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Emanuel Preuschl

Authors
  1. Michael Kimmel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emanuel Preuschl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kimmel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse Cedex 4, France

    Jean-Paul Laumond

  2. LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse Cedex 4, France

    Naoko Abe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kimmel, M., Preuschl, E. (2016). Dynamic Coordination Patterns in Tango Argentino: A Cross-Fertilization of Subjective Explication Methods and Motion Capture. In: Laumond, JP., Abe, N. (eds) Dance Notations and Robot Motion. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25739-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25737-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25739-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)