Clinical Applications of rTMS in Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke

  • Thomas PlatzEmail author


Both inhibitory and excitatory ipsilesional and contralesional non-invasive brain stimulation protocols (rTMS, TBS) have been applied during the acute, postacute and chronic phases to improve motor recovery in stroke patients having upper and/or lower limb paresis. A best evidence synthesis based on RCTs and meta-analyses is presented that can be used for clinical decision making.

Taken together, there is a substantial database indicating that the above-mentioned rTMS applications are safe when the conventional safety recommendations are followed. The intervention that had best been investigated is contralesional M1 low-frequency (inhibitory) rTMS. The most focused meta-analysis reported to date documents an overall effect size of 0.55 on average for rTMS therapies in arm motor rehabilitation after stroke that can be considered moderate. Given the low risk profile and the demonstrated clinical benefits, there is reason to recommend and apply rTMS therapy in stroke patients with motor deficits, especially arm paresis.


Stroke Patient Rest Motor Threshold Motor Recovery Sham Stimulation Chronic Stroke Patient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ackerley SJ, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Byblow WD (2010) Combining theta burst stimulation with training after subcortical stroke. Stroke 41:1568–1572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adeyemo BO, Simis M, Macea DD, Fregni F (2012) Systematic review of parameters of stimulation, clinical trial design characteristics, and motor outcomes in noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke. Front Psychiatry 3:88PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Alderson P, Dahm P, Falck-Ytter Y, Nasser M, Meerpohl J, Post PN, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist G, Rind D, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ, GRADE guidelines: 15 (2013) Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 66:719–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayache SS, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Hosseini H, Mylius V, Lefaucheur JP (2012) Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: motor deficit. Expert Rev Neurother 12:949–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Avenanti A, Coccia M, Ladavas E, Provinciali L, Ceravolo MG (2012) Low-frequency rtms promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Neurology 78:256–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burneo JG, Fang J, Saposnik G (2010) Impact of seizures on morbidity and mortality after stroke: a Canadian multi-centre cohort study. Eur J Neurol 17:52–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang WH, Kim YH, Bang OY, Kim ST, Park YH, Lee PK (2010) Long-term effects of rTMS on motor recovery in patients after subacute stroke. J Rehabil Med 42:758–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang WH, Bang OY, Shin YI, Lee A, Pascual-Leone A, Kim YH (2014) BDNF polymorphism and differential rTMS effects on motor recovery of stroke patients. Brain Stimul 7:553–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chieffo R, De Prezzo S, Houdayer E, Nuara A, Di Maggio G, Coppi E, Ferrari L, Straffi L, Spagnolo F, Velikova S, Sessa M, Comola M, Zangen A, Comi G, Leocani L (2014) Deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil on lower limb motor function in chronic stroke: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95:1141–1147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Conforto AB, Anjos SM, Saposnik G, Mello EA, Nagaya EM, Santos W Jr et al (2012) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mild to severe hemiparesis early after stroke: a proof of principle and novel approach to improve motor function. J Neurol 259:1399–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Emara T, El Nahas N, Elkader HA, Ashour S, El Etrebi A (2009) MRI can predict the response to therapeutic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke patients. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2:163–168PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Emara TH, Moustafa RR, Elnahas NM, Elganzoury AM, Abdo TA, Mohamed SA et al (2010) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1 Hz and 5 Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 17:1203–1209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Etoh S, Noma T, Ikeda K, Jonoshita Y, Ogata A, Matsumoto S et al (2013) Effects of repetitive trascranial magnetic stimulation on repetitive facilitation exercises of the hemiplegic hand in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med 45:843–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS (2003) Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol 2:43–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, Rocha RR, Duarte J, Ferreira MJ et al (2006) A sham controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke 37:2115–2122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group (2008) Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 336:1049–1051PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hao Z, Wang D, Zeng Y, Liu M (2013) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (5):CD008862.Google Scholar
  18. Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Liao KK, Lee IH, Lin YY (2012) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor functions in patients with stroke: a metaanalysis. Stroke 43:1849–1857CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Khedr EM, Abdel-Fadeil MR, Farghali A, Qaid M (2009) Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 16:1323–1330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, Park JW, Lee KH, Jang SH et al (2006) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke 37:1471–1476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Q, Qu Y, Tao Y, Zhu S (2014) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on hand function recovery and excitability of the motor cortex after stroke: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 93:422–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL (2009) What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:313–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liepert J, Zittel S, Weiller C (2007) Improvement of dexterity by single session low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in acute stroke: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25:461–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lomarev MP, Kim DY, Richardson SP, Voller B, Hallett M (2007) Safety study of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2072–2075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Malcolm MP, Triggs WJ, Light KE, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Wu S, Reid K et al (2007) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86(9):707–715Google Scholar
  26. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, Riberto M, Gallucci-Neto J et al (2005). A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 24;64(10):1802–1804Google Scholar
  27. Meehan SK, Dao E, Linsdell MA, Boyd LA (2011) Continuous theta burst stimulation over the contralesional sensory and motor cortex enhances motor learning poststroke. Neurosci Lett 500:26–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Platz T, Eickhof C, van Kaick S, Engel U, Pinkowski C, Kalok S, Pause M (2005) Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for arm paresis after stroke: a single blind, multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 19:714–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Platz T, Roschka S, Christel MI, Duecker F, Rothwell JC, Sack A (2012a) Early stages of motor skill learning and the specific relevance of the cortical motor system – a combined behavioural training and theta burst TMS study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 30:199–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Platz T, Roschka S, Doppl K, Roth C, Lotze M, Sack AT, Rothwell JC (2012b) Prolonged motor skill learning – a combined behavioural training and theta burst TMS study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 30:213–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pomeroy VM, Cloud G, Tallis RC, Donaldson C, Nayak V, Miller S (2007) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: a randomized proof-of-principle and feasibility investigation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21(6):509–517Google Scholar
  32. Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A, Safety of TMS Consensus Group (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120:2008–2039PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sasaki N, Mizutani S, Kakuda W, Abo M (2013) Comparison of the effects of high- and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22:413–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Seniów J, Bilik M, Leśniak M, Waldowski K, Iwański S, Członkowska A (2012) Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with physiotherapy in rehabilitation of poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26:1072–1079CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sloan JA, Cella D, Hays RD (2005) Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1217–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sung WH, Wang CP, Chou CL, Chen YC, Chang YC, Tsai PY (2013) Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients. Stroke 44:1375–1382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K (2005) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 36:2681–2686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Takeuchi N, Tada T, Toshima M, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Ikoma K (2008) Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 40:298–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Talelli P, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell JC (2007) Exploring Theta Burst Stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 118:333–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Talelli P, Wallace A, Dileone M, Hoad D, Cheeran B, Oliver R et al (2012) Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: a semirandomized, placebo controlled trial in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26:976–987PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Theilig S, Podubecka J, Bösl K, Wiederer R, Nowak DA (2011) Functional neuromuscular stimulation to improve severe hand dysfunction after stroke: does inhibitory rTMS enhance therapeutic efficiency? Exp Neurol 230(1):149–155Google Scholar
  42. Wang CP, Tsai PY, Yang TF, Yang KY, Wang CC (2014) Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery. CNS Neurosci Ther 20:355–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ward NS, Cohen LG (2004) Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol 61:1844–1848PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BDH-Klinik GreifswaldErnst-Moritz-Arndt UniversitätGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations