Abstract
Increased access to technology in school districts across the United States has sparked a growing demand for teachers and administrators to transform traditional teaching and learning models. These changes require a clear vision and plan to support educators through the transition. This paper presents findings from the second year evaluation of a one-to-one student laptop initiative in a large urban district in the United States that illustrate the impact of vision and planning on efforts to support changes in teacher practice, classroom culture, and student engagement. Additionally, this paper details how an outside evaluation has informed practice within the district and mobilized leaders to move towards a more personalized professional learning approach designed to leverage the power of technology. Strategies and recommendations for how to better support district and school leaders in using technology to enhance teaching and learning are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All names have been changed to pseudonyms.
References
Anthony, A.B.: Activity theory as a framework for investigating district-classroom system interactions and their influences on technology integration. J. Res. Technol. 44(4), 335–356 (2012)
Dexter, S.: School technology leadership: artifacts in systems of practice. J. Sch. Leadersh. 21, 166–189 (2011)
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., Peck, C.: High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: explaining an apparent paradox. Am. Educ. Res. J. 38(4), 813–834 (2001)
Donovan, S.M., Bransford, J.D.: How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom. National Research Council, Washington (2005)
Ertmer, P.: Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 53(4), 25–39 (2005)
Ertmer, P., Ottenbreit-Leftwhich, A.: Teacher technology change: how knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 42(3), 255–284 (2010)
Gray, L., Thomas, N., Lewis, L.: Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010–040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC (2010)
Hsieh, H., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Rese. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)
Inan, F.A., Lowther, D.L.: Factors affecting technology integration in K12 classrooms: a path model. Educ. Tech Res. Dev. 58, 137–154 (2010)
Ingersoll, R., Smith, T.M.: Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NAASP Bull. 88(638), 28–40 (2004)
Joyce, B., Showers, B.: Designing Training and Peer Coaching: Our Needs for Learning. ASCD, Alexandria (2002)
Ladson-Billings, G.: But that’s just good teaching! the case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theor. Pract. 34(3), 159–165 (1995)
Levin, B.B., Schrum, L.: Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: lessons learned from award-winning secondary schools/districts. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 46(1), 29–51 (2013)
Office of Educational Technology at U.S. Department of Education. Future Ready District Pledge (2014). http://tech.ed.gov/futureready/
Overbay, A., Patterson, A.S., Vasu, E.S., Grable, L.L.: Constructivism and technology use: findings from the IMPACTing leadership project. Educ. Media Int. 47(2), 103–120 (2010)
Marzano, R.J., Waters, T., McNulty, B.A.: School Leadership that Works: From Research to Results. ASCD, Alexandria (2005)
Public Broadcasting Services and Grunwald Associates LLC, 2 February 2011. Deepening Connections: Teachers Increasingly Rely on Media and Technology. http://www-tc.pbs.org/about/media/about/cms_page_media/182/PBS-Grunwald-2011e.pdf
P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Framework for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework
Richardson, W.: Preparing students to learn without us. Educ. Leadersh. 69(5), 22–26 (2012)
Ritzhaupt, A.D., Dawson, K., Cavanaugh, C.: An investigation of factors influencing student use of technology in K-12 classrooms using path analysis. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 46(3), 229–254 (2012)
Rogoff, B.: Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)
Sandholtz and Reilly: Teachers, not technicians: rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teach. Coll. Rec. 106(3), 487–512 (2004)
Spillane, J.P., Halverson, R., Diamond, J.B.: Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Educ. Res. 30(3), 23–28 (2001)
Thorton, B., Peltier, G., Perreault, G.: Systems thinking: a skill to improve student achievement. Clearing House 77(5), 222–227 (2004)
Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., van Braak, J., Valcke, M.: Exploring the link between teachers’ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 2541–2553 (2008)
Vescio, V., Ross, D., Adams, A.: A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24, 80–91 (2008)
Wenger, E.: Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organ. 7(2), 225–246 (2000)
White, N., Ringstaff, C, Kelley, L.: Getting the most from technology in schools. WestEd, pp. 1–12 (2002)
Windschitl, M., Sahl, K.: Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: the interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. Am. Educ. Res. J. 39(1), 165–205 (2002)
Zhao, Y., Frank, K.A.: Factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective. Am. Educ. Res. J. 40(4), 807–840 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A
Overall classroom experience: On a scale of 1 (classroom experience is low technology integration) to 4 (classroom experience is high technology integration): ______
Explain overall classroom experience below:
-
1.
Enhancement:
-
2.
Engage
-
3.
Student Ownership:
-
4.
Personalization:
-
5.
Relevance
Appendix B
EUSD Secondary Technology Program
Teacher Focus Group Protocol
-
1.
Can you all share about what a typical day is like in your ELA classes? What tends to happen in your classrooms?
-
2.
How do students work together? What kinds of work do students produce in your classes?
-
3.
Do you use technology in your classrooms? If you are using technology in your classroom, can each of you share how? If not, can you please explain why not?
-
4.
The ways in which you are describing how you use technology, are these expectations set by your site about how you will use technology in the classroom? Or your own expectations? Can you explain?
-
5.
Have you noticed the ways in which students are being impacted (or not) by technology? Has it changed students’ behaviors in your classes? Has the use of technology influenced relationships in the classroom among students? Or the student-teacher relationship? How has this initiative influenced expectations in these particular classrooms?
-
6.
What kind of professional development have you received to support your participation in the technology initiative for your classes? Can you share some examples of what you have experienced?
-
7.
What kinds of professional development do you feel you need or will require as this initiative moves forward?
-
8.
We want to know how the initiative may be influencing what happens at the school-wide level. What is a typical day at your school? How would you describe your school environment, in terms of how students interact with each other? How adults and students interact with each other? Has the initiative influenced these interactions and/or relationships at the school-wide level? Please explain.
Concerns/Recommendations
-
9.
What concerns, questions, or recommendations do you have about the roll-out of the One-to-One Technology Program?
-
10.
Is there anything else you would like to add that would help us understand the One-to-One Technology Program in the District?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Garza, V.G. (2015). Transforming Teaching and Learning: Implications of a One-to-One Laptop Initiative for Professional Learning and Teacher Practices. In: Brown, T., van der Merwe, H. (eds) The Mobile Learning Voyage - From Small Ripples to Massive Open Waters. mLearn 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25683-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25684-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)