Skip to main content

Use of Web 2.0 and Mobile Technologies for Developing Argumentative Skills

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Mobile Learning Voyage - From Small Ripples to Massive Open Waters (mLearn 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 560))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Web 2.0 and mobile technologies have the potential to support learning outside formal learning spaces. In this paper, we examine the extent to which the use of Web 2.0 and mobile technologies has an impact on the argumentative skills of Grade 11 students in a Singapore high school. Using a quasi-experimental and mixed method research design, we looked at the quality of students’ writing at the end of a six-week intervention that involved students using Schoology to read assigned materials, share new materials, post arguments, and respond to their classmates’ arguments. We also examined both student and teacher interview transcripts to gain an understanding of how students and teachers viewed Schoology as an e-learning tool. Students in the experimental group showed higher levels of argumentation skills compared to students in the control group. Findings from student and teacher interviews concerning the use of Web 2.0 and mobile technologies to help them develop argumentative skills were mixed. The analysis of the interviews revealed that some students felt that it was distracting because they tended to veer into social media sites and preferred to use them in the classroom, while others felt that Schoology provided a great platform for them to develop argumentative skills as peer feedback gave them multiple perspectives. It developed a community of learners, and provided an interesting and interactive experience. The participation rate was higher on the online platform compared to classroom discussion. The teacher reported that students’ essays became more coherent and their content more relevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arslan, R.S., Sahin-Kizik, A.: How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 23(3), 183–197 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge International Examinations Mark scheme for the October/November 2012 series (2012). http://www.cie.org.uk/images/155164-november-2012-mark-scheme-12.pdf

  • Chandrasegaran, A., Kong, C.K.M.: Stance-taking and stance-support in students’ online forum discussion. Linguist. Educ. 17(4), 374–390 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, T.D.: Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile 2.0. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45(1), 65–82 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Simon, J., Osborne, J.: Tapping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Sci. Educ. 88(6), 915–933 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 2(2–3), 87–105 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H.: Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 7, 95–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, F.H., Cheung, W.S.: Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: the search for evidence-based practice. Educ. Res. Rev. 9, 47–64 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H.-Y., Wang, S.: The impact of using blogs on college students’ reading comprehension and learning motivation. Lit. Res. Inst. 50, 68–88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore. Annual survey on infocomm usage in households and by individuals for 2013. At Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore website (2013). http://www.ida.gov.sg/~/media/Files/Infocomm%20Landscape/Facts%20and%20Figures/SurveyReport/2013/2013HHmgt.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2015

  • Jonassen, D.H., Kim, B.: Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 58(4), 439–457 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H., Peck, L., Wilson, B.G.: Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Merrill, Upper Saddle River (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D.: The Skills of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Means, M.L., Voss, J.F.: Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognit. Instr. 14, 139–178 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, D.L., Hood, M.: The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in a university statistics course. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 25(3), 382–398 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pae, J.-K.: Wiki-based English writing: Its effect on English writing proficiency and anxiety and Korean learners’ perceptions. Multimed. Assist. Lang. Learn. 10(1), 81–105 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskya, A., Anderson, R.C., McNurlin, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., Kim, S.Y.: Influence of oral discussion on written argumentation. Discourse Process. 32(2–3), 155–175 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, J,, Guzdial, M., Carroll, K., Holloway-Attaway, L., Walker, B.: Collaborative learning at low cost: coWeb use in english composition. In: Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference, pp. 435–442, Boulder (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartphone penetration in Singapore the highest globally: Survey. At Today website, 11 February 2015. http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/smartphone-penetration-singapore-highest-globally-survey. Accessed 1 July 2015

  • Thomson, H.: Wikis, blogs and web 2.0 technology. At University of Melbourne website (2008). http://www.unimelb.edu.au/copyright/information/guides/wikisblogsweb2blue.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2014

  • Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichadee, S.: Using wikis to develop summary writing abilities of students in an EFL class. J. Coll. Teach. Learn. 7(12), 5–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R.M.F., Hew, K.F.: The impact of blogging and scaffolding on primary school pupils’ narrative writing: a case study. Int. J. Web based Learn. Teach. Technol. 5(2), 1–17 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible by a grant to the authors from the ELIS Research Fund administered by the English Language Institute of Singapore (Grant ERF-2014-02-SD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Gwee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gwee, S., Damodaran, S. (2015). Use of Web 2.0 and Mobile Technologies for Developing Argumentative Skills. In: Brown, T., van der Merwe, H. (eds) The Mobile Learning Voyage - From Small Ripples to Massive Open Waters. mLearn 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25683-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25684-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics