When Should Environmental Awareness Be a Policy Goal?

Assessing the Conditions Under Which Raising Awareness Increases Environmental Sustainability and Societal Resilience
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)


Since the 1970s, governments have increasingly sought to achieve greater environmental awareness among their citizens using “soft” policy instruments like education and pro-social campaigns. The assumption has been that greater awareness among populations would result in changes in individuals’ behaviors, and reduce aggregate effects of environmental degradation in ways that could not easily be addressed through “hard” regulatory or economic instruments. Decades later, governments still invest in environmental campaigns and education, but the evidence for their effects on material improvements to the environment and societal benefits is not always clear. This chapter addresses why this is the case and categorizes the conditions under which governments may be most likely to find environmental awareness to be a rational target in pursuit of improvements in environmental conditions, and society may be most able to meet these challenges.


Risk Perception Public Participation Environmental Awareness Environmental Attitude Civic Participation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Thank you to Robert Gifford and Danna Walker for reviewing this chapter.


  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Rothengatter, T.: A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psychol. 25, 273–291 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Advertising Standards Authority.: ASA Ruling on Department of Energy and Climate Change, complaint ref: 106458 [WWW Document]. ASA. http://www.asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2010/3/Department-of-Energy-and-Climate-Change/TF_ADJ_48225.aspx#.VGf3TLHzPX0 (2010, March 17). Accessed 16 Nov 2014
  3. Ahn, S.J. (Grace), Bailenson, J.N., Park, D.: Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 39, 235–245 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025
  4. Ajzen.: Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. McGraw-Hill International, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991). doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84, 888–918 (1977). doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ajzen, I., Joyce, N., Sheikh, S., Cote, N.G.: Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: the role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 33, 101–117 (2011). doi: 10.1080/01973533.2011.568834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ajzen, I., Madden, T.J.: Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22, 453–474 (1986). doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Akerlof, K., Kennedy, C.: Nudging toward a healthy environment: How behavioral change research can inform conservation. White paper for the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA (2013)Google Scholar
  10. Akerlof, K.L., Batten, B., Rajasekar, M., Cutshall, C.: Community Adaptation to Sea-Level Rise and Inundation: Final Project Report. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Akerlof, K., Maibach, E.W.: “Sermons” as a climate change policy tool: do they work? Evidence from the international community. Glob. Stud. Rev. 4, 4–6 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. Andrews, R.N.L.: Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Armitage, C.J., Conner, M.: Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 471–499 (2001). doi: 10.1348/014466601164939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 35, 216–224 (1969). doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Atkin, C.K., Rice, R.E.: Advances in public communication campaigns. In: Valdivia, A.N. (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies. Blackwell, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  16. Bamberg, S., Möser, G.: Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 27, 14–25 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barabas, J.: How deliberation affects policy opinions. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98(04), 687–701 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. Beierle, T.C., Cayford, J.: Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Bem, D.J.: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human Affairs. Brooks/Cole, Oxford, England (1970)Google Scholar
  20. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L.: Introduction: policy instrument choice and evaluation. In: Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R.C., Vedung, E.O. (eds.) Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick/London (2011)Google Scholar
  21. Birkland, T.A.: Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change After Catastrophic Events. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC (2006)Google Scholar
  22. Birkland, T.A.: After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC (1997)Google Scholar
  23. Breckler, S.J.: Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47, 1191–1205 (1984). doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Breckler, S.J., Wiggins, E.C.: On defining attitude and attitude theory. In: Pratkanis, A.R., Breckler, S.J., Greenwald, A.G. (eds.) Attitude, Structure and Function, pp. 42–61. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (1989)Google Scholar
  25. Brimblecombe, P.: The Big Smoke: A History of Air Pollution in London Since Medieval Times. Routledge, London (2011)Google Scholar
  26. Brulle, R.J.: From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: environmental communication for civic engagement. Environ. Commun. J. Nat. Cult. 4, 82–98 (2010). doi: 10.1080/17524030903522397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Campbell, D.F.: People Who Litter. ENCAMS, Wigan, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  28. Carpini, M.X.D., Cook, F.L., Jacobs, L.R.: Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 7, 315–344 (2004). doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carvalho, L., Meier, S., Wang, S.W.: Poverty and economic decision making: evidence from changes in financial resources at payday. Center for economic and social research working paper (2014)Google Scholar
  30. Chawla, L.: Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. J. Environ. Educ. 29, 11–21 (1998). doi: 10.1080/00958969809599114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Clayton, S., Myers, G.: Conservation Psychology: Understanding and Promoting Human Care for Nature. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  32. “Climate Victory” campaign turns back the clock on clean energy battles [WWW Document]. Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/27/climate-victory-campaign-posters_n_5399072.html (2014). Accessed 22 Nov 2014
  33. Cohen, J.: A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112, 155–159 (1992). doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Convention on Biological Diversity, opened for signature Jun 5, 1992, 1760 U.N.T.S. 79, 31 I.L.M. 818. https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/default.shtml
  35. Corner, A., Randall, A.: Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement. Glob. Environ. Chang. 21, 1005–1014 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dahlbom, B., Greer, H., Egmond, C., Jonkers, R.: Changing Energy Behaviour. Guidelines for Behavioural Change Programmes. The BEHAVE Project, Intelligent Energy Europe Programme. http://www.idae.es/uploads/documentos/documentos_10457_BEHAVE_changing_energy_behaviour_09_c5724555.pdf (2009)
  37. De Boer, J., Schösler, H., Boersema, J.J.: Climate change and meat eating: an inconvenient couple? J. Environ. Psychol. 33, 1–8 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. De Groot, J.I.M., Steg, L.: Morality and prosocial behavior: the role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. J. Soc. Psychol. 149, 425–449 (2009). doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.4.425-449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Deutscher, I.: Words and deeds: social science and social policy. Soc. Probl. 13, 235 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Diamond, J.M.: Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Viking, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  41. Dietz, T., Gardner, G.T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P.C., Vandenbergh, M.P.: Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 18452–18456 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R., Vlaev, I.: Influencing behaviour: the mindspace way. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 264–277 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Vlaev, I.: MINDSPACE: Influencing Behaviour Through Public Policy. Institute for Government, London (2010)Google Scholar
  44. Dunlap, R.E.: The new environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. J. Environ. Educ. 40, 3–18 (2008). doi: 10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S.: The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando, FL, US (1993)Google Scholar
  46. Epstein, S.: Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am. Psychol. 49, 709–724 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1962)Google Scholar
  48. Fishkin, J.S.: When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  49. Fishkin, J.S., Luskin, R.C.: Experimenting with a democratic ideal: deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica 40, 284–298 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Frank, D.J., Hironaka, A., Schofer, E.: The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65, 96–116 (2000). doi: 10.2307/2657291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Franzen, A.: Environmental attitudes in international comparison: an analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Soc. Sci. Q. 84, 297–308 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R.: Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25, 739–755 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gardner, G.T., Stern, P.C.: Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  54. Gastil, J.: Political Communication and Deliberation. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfeld, A.H., Tanishima, S., Unander, F.: Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, Hong Kong Editorial Board meeting presentations Hong Kong Editorial Board meeting presentations, vol. 34, pp. 556–573 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.010
  56. Gifford, R. (ed.): Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice. Optimal Books, Colville, WA (2014)Google Scholar
  57. Gifford, R., Kormos, C., McIntyre, A.: Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 2, 801–827 (2011). doi: 10.1002/wcc.143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gifford, R., Sussman, R.: Environmental attitudes. In: Clayton, S.D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, p. 65. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  59. Gillespie, E.: Climate change adverts help take debate among public back several years [WWW Document]. The Guardian (Environment Blog). http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/mar/17/climate-change-advertising-standards-authority (2010). Accessed 16 Nov 2014
  60. Glasman, L.R., Albarracín, D.: Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychol. Bull. 132, 778–822 (2006). doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal (2010)Google Scholar
  62. Goebbert, K., Jenkins-Smith, H.C., Klockow, K., Nowlin, M.C., Silva, C.L.: Weather, climate, and worldviews: the sources and consequences of public perceptions of changes in local weather patterns. Weather Clim. Soc. 4, 132–144 (2012). doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00044.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Grob, A.: A structural model of environmental attitudes and behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. Green Psychol 15, 209–220 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90004-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gynther, L., Mikkonen, I., Smits, A.: Evaluation of European energy behavioural change programmes. Energy Effic. 5, 67–82 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hardeman, W., Johnston, M., Johnston, D.W., Bonetti, D., Wareham, N.J., Kinmonth, A.L.: Application of the theory of planned behaviour in behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Psychol. Health 17, 123 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968). doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hards, S., Wentworth, J.: Postnote: Climate Change: Engagement and Behavior (No. 347). Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London (2010)Google Scholar
  68. Heberlein, T.A.: Navigating Environmental Attitudes. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R., Tomera, A.N.: Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. J. Environ. Educ. 18, 1–8 (1987). doi: 10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Huffman, K.T., Grossnickle, W.F., Cope, J.G., Huffman, K.P.: Litter reduction a review and integration of the literature. Environ. Behav. 27, 153–183 (1995). doi: 10.1177/0013916595272003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hungerford, H.R., Volk, T.L.: Changing learner behavior through environmental education. J. Environ. Educ. 21, 8–21 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. IPCC: Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, Geneva, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  73. Irvin, R.A., Stansbury, J.: Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Adm. Rev. 64, 55–65 (2004). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Jackson, T.: Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change. Sustainable Development Research Network, London (2005)Google Scholar
  75. Jakovcevic, A., Steg, L., Mazzeo, N., Caballero, R., Franco, P., Putrino, N., Favara, J.: Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behavioral effects. J. Environ. Psychol. 40, 372–380 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Jasanoff, S.: Learning from Disaster: Risk Management After Bhopal. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1994)Google Scholar
  77. Kahan, D.: Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk. In: Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Roeser, S., Peterson, M. (eds.) Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk, pp. 725–760. Springer, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kahan, D.M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L.L., Braman, D., Mandel, G.: The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 732–735 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kahneman, D.: Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 1449–1475 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J.: Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 8, 239–260 (2002). doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kormos, C., Gifford, R.: The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: a meta-analytic review. J. Environ. Psychol. 40, 359–371 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kraus, S.J.: Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21, 58–75 (1995). doi: 10.1177/0146167295211007 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N.: Knowledge of Climate Change Across Global Warming’s six Americas, Yale University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CT (2010)Google Scholar
  84. Leopold, A.: Game Management. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1987)Google Scholar
  85. Louv, R.: Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill, NC (2008)Google Scholar
  86. Maibach, E.W., Abroms, L., Marosits, M.: Communication and marketing as tools to cultivate the public’s health: a proposed “people and places” framework. BMC Public Health 7, 88 (2007). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., Zhao, J.: Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science 341, 976–980 (2013). doi: 10.1126/science.1238041 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Marquart-Pyatt, S.T., McCright, A.M., Dietz, T., Dunlap, R.E.: Politics eclipses climate extremes for climate change perceptions. Glob. Environ. Chang. 29, 246–257 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Marsden, W.E.: Environmental education: historical roots, comparative perspectives, and current issues in Britain and the United States. J. Curric. Superv. 13, 6–29 (1997)Google Scholar
  90. McKenzie-Mohr, D., Lee, N.R., Schultz, P.W., Kotler, P.: Social Marketing to Protect the Environment: What Works. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2011)Google Scholar
  91. McKenzie-Mohr, D., Smith, W.: Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing, 1st edn. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, British Columbia (1999)Google Scholar
  92. Michael, M.: Ignoring science: discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science. In: Irwin, A., Wynne, B. (eds.) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, pp. 107--125. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  93. Monroe, M.C.: Two avenues for encouraging conservation behaviors. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 10, 113–125 (2003)Google Scholar
  94. Montgomery, D.R.: Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations. University of California Press, Berkeley (2012)Google Scholar
  95. Montgomery, D.R.: Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 13268–13272 (2007). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611508104 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Myers, T.A., Maibach, E.W., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K., Leiserowitz, A.A.: The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 343–347 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nclimate1754 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. National Research Council: Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2008)Google Scholar
  98. Nisbet, M.: Framing science: a new paradigm in public engagement. In: Kahlor, L., Stout, P. (eds.) Understanding and Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication. Routledge, London (2009)Google Scholar
  99. Nohrstedt, D.: The politics of crisis policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish nuclear energy policy. Policy Stud. J. 36, 257–278 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Nordlund, A.M., Garvill, J.: Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. J. Environ. Psychol. 23, 339–347 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Ofcom.: Ofcome broadcast bulletin (No. 167). Ofcom, London (2010)Google Scholar
  102. Osmańczyk, E.J.: Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements: A to F. Taylor & Francis, London (2003)Google Scholar
  103. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C.B., Norgaard, R.B., Policansky, D.: Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284, 278–282 (1999). doi: 10.1126/science.284.5412.278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pergams, O.R.W., Zaradic, P.A.: Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 2295–2300 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709893105 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pergams, O.R.W., Zaradic, P.A.: Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. J. Environ. Manage. 80, 387–393 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Redman, C.L.: Human Impact on Ancient Environments. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (1999)Google Scholar
  107. Renn, O.: Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Earthscan Risk in Society Series. Earthscan, London, Sterling, VA (2008)Google Scholar
  108. Restuccia, A.: Energy department pushes efficient light bulbs in new ad campaign [WWW Document]. The Hill. http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/172281-energy-department-touts-efficient-light-bulbs-in-new-ad-campaign (2011, July 19). Accessed 22 Nov 2014
  109. Rome, A.: The Genius of Earth Day: How a 1970 Teach-in Unexpectedly Made the First Green Generation. Hill and Wang, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  110. Ruddell, D., Harlan, S., Grossman-Clarke, S., Chowell, G.: Scales of perception: public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates. Clim. Change 111, 581–607 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0165-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Saghai, Y.: Salvaging the concept of nudge. J. Med. Ethics 39, 487–493 (2013). doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schultz, P.W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J.J., Khazian, A.M.: Implicit connections with nature. J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 31–42 (2004). doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Schwartz, S.H.: Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J. Soc. Issues 50, 19–45 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Science and Technology Select Committee.: Behavior change, 2nd report of session 2010 – 12. House of Lords, London (2011)Google Scholar
  115. Simon, H.: Invariants of human behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41, 1–19 (1990)Google Scholar
  116. Skocpol, T.: Naming the problem: what it will take to counter extremism and engage Americans in the fight against global warming. Prepared for the symposium on the politics of America’s fight against global warming, Harvard University, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  117. Sloman, S.A.: The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 119, 3–22 (1996). doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F.: Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 645–665 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W.: Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. J. Environ. Psychol. 25, 415–425 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Stern, P.C.: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56, 407–424 (2000). doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sunstein, C.R.: The Ethics of Nudging (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2526341). Science Research Network, Rochester, NY (2014)Google Scholar
  122. Sweney, M.: More than 200 complaints at government’s climate change TV ad [WWW Document]. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/oct/16/complaints-government-climate-change-ad (2009, Oct 16). Accessed 16 Nov 2014
  123. Syme, G.J., Nancarrow, B.E., Seligman, C.: The evaluation of information campaigns to promote voluntary household water conservation. Eval. Rev. 24, 539–578 (2000). doi: 10.1177/0193841X0002400601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tanner, T.: Significant life experiences: a new research area in environmental education. J. Environ. Educ. 11, 20–24 (1980). doi: 10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2008)Google Scholar
  126. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.: Libertarian paternalism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 175–179 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Thaler, R., Sunstein, C., Balz, J.: Choice Architecture (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1583509). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY (2010)Google Scholar
  128. The history of Earth Day. [WWW Document]. Earth Day Network. http://www.earthday.org/about/the-history-of-earth-day/ (n.d.). Accessed 9 March 2016
  129. Todd, P.M., Gigerenzer, G. (eds.): Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World, Evolution and Cognition. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  130. Tyler, T.: The psychology of cooperation: implications for public policy. In: Shafir, E. (ed.) The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, pp. 77–90. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2013)Google Scholar
  131. Tyler, T., Rankin, L.: The mystique of instrumentalism. In: Hanson, J. (ed.) Ideology, Psychology, and Law, pp. 537–573. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. UNESCO, UNEP.: Intergovernmental conference on environmental education. USSR, Tblisi, Georgia (1978)Google Scholar
  133. Ungar, S.: Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Underst. Sci. 9, 297–312 (2000). doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, May 9, 1992, S. Treaty Doc No. 102-38, 1771 U.N.T.S. 107.Google Scholar
  135. Uzunboylu, H., Cavus, N., Ercag, E.: Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Comput. Educ. 52, 381–389 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Vandenbergh, M.P., Barkenbus, J., Gilligan, J.M.: Individual carbon emissions: the low-hanging fruit. UCLA Law Rev. 55, 08–36 (2008)Google Scholar
  137. Van Liere, K.D., Dunlap, R.E.: Environmental concern: does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environ. Behav. 13, 651–676 (1981). doi: 10.1177/0013916581136001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Vedung, E.O.: Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In: Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R.C., Vedung, E.O. (eds.) Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. Transaction Publishers, London (2011)Google Scholar
  139. Visser, P., Holbrook, A.L.: Metacognitive determinants of attitude strength. In: Briñol, P., DeMarree, K.G. (eds.) Social Metacognition, pp. 21–41. Psychology Press, New York, London (2012)Google Scholar
  140. Vohs, K.D., Baumeister, R.F., Schmeichel, B.J., Twenge, J.M., Nelson, N.M., Tice, D.M.: Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 883–898 (2008). doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wals, A.E.J.: Learning our way out of unsustainability: the role of environmental education. In: Clayton, S.D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  142. Wals, A.E.J.: Learning our way to sustainability. J. Educ. Sustain. Dev. 5, 177–186 (2011). doi: 10.1177/097340821100500208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Wansink, B., Sobal, J.: Mindless eating: the 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environ. Behav. 39, 106–123 (2007). doi: 10.1177/0013916506295573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wicker, A.W.: Attitudes versus actions: the relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. J. Soc. Issues 25, 41–78 (1969). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00619.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wu, C., Shaffer, D.R.: Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 677–688 (1987). doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wynne, B.: Knowledges in context. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 16, 111–121 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Ziman, J.: Public understanding of science. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 16, 99–105 (1991). doi: 10.1177/016224399101600106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason University’s Center for Climate Change CommunicationFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations