Skip to main content

Participatory Sensing: Recruiting Bipedal Platforms or Building Issue-centred Projects?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

This paper raises questions about the way in which participation and recruitment are framed within participatory sensing. The text outlines a number of assumptions of participatory sensing and using a case study, examines the impacts of these assumptions on the practices of participatory sensing. The case study involves a mobile phone app that monitors ambient sound levels and creates noise maps. The study describes the conceptual and practical challenges of recruiting people and the need for an issue-centred campaign that encases the app inside a wider framework of local environmental issues. Based on observations from the case study, the paper proposes a pragmatic approach to sensing that focuses on designing sensing assemblages that support local issues of public concern. The paper argues that an issue-centred approach enables sensing that allows both machines and humans to participate in an equitable way that maximises their unique sensing abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amintoosi, H., Kanhere, S.S.: A trust-based recruitment framework for multi-hop social participatory sensing. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (IEEE DCOSS 2013), pp. 266–273. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Angus, A., Papadogkonas, D., Papamarkos, G., Roussos, G., Lane, G., Martin, K., West, N., Thelwall, S., Sujon, Z., Silverstone, R.: Urban social tapestries. Pervasive Comput. 7(4), 44–51 (2008). doi:10.1109/MPRV.2008.84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C., Bridge, G.: Geographies of radical democracy: agonistic pragmatism and the formation of affected interests. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 103(4), 1022–1040 (2013). doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.660395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhadauria, D., Tekdas, O., Isler, V.: Robotic data mules for collecting data over sparse sensor fields. J. Field Rob. 28(3), 388–404 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.A.: Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign 8(2–3), 127–144 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Convergence Int. J. Res. New Media Technol. 14(1), 75–90 (2008). doi:10.1177/1354856507084420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J., Estrin, D., Hansen, M., Parker, A., Ramanathan, N., Reddy, S., Srivastava, M.B.: Participatory sensing. In: Workshop on World-Sensor-Web (WSW’06): Mobile Device Centric Sensor Networks and Applications, pp. 117–134. Center for Embedded Network Sensing, UC Los Angeles, ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A.T., Eisenman, S.B., Lane, N.D., Miluzzo, E., Peterson, R.A.: People-centric urban sensing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Workshop on Wireless Internet - WICON ’06, pp. 18–31. ACM, New York (2006). doi:10.1145/1234161.1234179

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, A., Paxton, M., Glover, K., Flintham, M., Price, D., Greenhalgh, C., Benford, S., Tolmie, P., Kanjo, E., Gower, A., Gower, A., Woodgate, D., Fraser, D.S.: Understanding mass participatory pervasive computing systems for environmental campaigns. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18(7), 1775–1792 (2013). doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0756-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.: The origins and practice of participatory appraisal. World Dev. 22(7), 953–969 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J.: Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience 58(3), 192–197 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyne, P., Gielen, P. (eds.): Community Art. The Politics of Trespassing. Valiz, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: The Public and Its Problems. Swallow Press and Ohio University Press, Athens (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Hondt, E., Stevens, M., Jacobs, A.: Participatory noise mapping works! an evaluation of participatory sensing as an alternative to standard techniques for environmental monitoring. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 9(5), 681–694 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J.L., Zuckerberg, B., Bonter, D.N.: Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41, 149–172 (2010). doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman, S.B., Lane, N.D., Miluzzo, E., Peterson, R.A., Ahn, G.s., Campbell, A.T.: MetroSense project: people-centric sensing at scale. In: Proceedings of Workshop on World-Sensor-Web (WSW 2006), pp. 6–11. ACM, Boulder, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.: Jizz and the joy of pattern recognition: virtuosity, discipline and the agency of insight in UK naturalists’ arts of seeing. Soc. Stud. Sci. 41(6), 769–790 (2011). doi:10.1177/0306312711423432. http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0306312711423432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, D.: Reflections on wireless sensing systems: from ecosystems to human systems. In: Radio and Wireless Symposium, 2007 IEEE, pp. 1–4. IEEE, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • EveryAware: EveryAware: enhancing environmental awareness through social information technologies white paper (2011). http://www.everyaware.eu/resources/deliverables/D6_1.pdf

  • EveryAware: about everyaware and widenoise (2012). http://cs.everyaware.eu/event/widenoise/about

  • Forrest, B.: Humans as sensors (2010). http://www.lbxjournal.com/articles/humans-sensors/260057

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganti, R.K., Tsai, Y.E., Abdelzaher, T.F.: SenseWorld: towards cyber-physical social networks. In: IPSN ’08 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 563–564. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2008). doi:10.1109/IPSN.2008.48

    Google Scholar 

  • HACAN ClearSkies: HACAN ClearSkies. http://www.hacan.org.uk/ (2016)

  • Hepple, L.W.: Geography and the pragmatic tradition: the threefold engagement. Geoforum 39(4), 1530–1541 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honicky, R.E.: Towards a societal scale, mobile sensing system. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeremijenko, N.: Feral robotic dogs (2002). http://www.nyu.edu/projects/xdesign/feralrobots/

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamel Boulos, M.N., Resch, B., Crowley, D.N., Breslin, J.G., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., Pike, W.A., Jezierski, E., Chuang, K.Y.S.: Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples. Int. J. Health Geogr. 10(67), 1–29 (2011). doi:10.1186/1476-072X-10-67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittur, A., Chi, E., Suh, B.: Crowdsourcing user studies with mechanical Turk. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 453–456. ACM, New York, USA (2008). doi:10.1145/1357054.1357127

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, A., Horvitz, E., Kansal, A., Zhao, F.: Toward community sensing. In: 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2008), pp. 481–492. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2008). doi:10.1109/IPSN.2008.37

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, K.c., Wang, H.y.: On providing incentives to collect road traffic information. In: International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’13). IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Letts, P.: The rise of and future of crowdsourcing (2006). http://www.internetworld.co.uk/page.cfm/Link=196/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, J.: Counting corncrakes: the affective science of the UK corncrake census. Soc. Stud. Sci. 38(3), 377–405 (2008). doi:10.1177/0306312707084396. http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0306312707084396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, T., Tham, C.K.: Fairness and social welfare in incentivizing participatory sensing. In: 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), pp. 425–433. IEEE, Washington, DC, USA (2012). doi:10.1109/SECON.2012.6275807

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N.: The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Soc. Stud. Sci. 37(5), 759–780 (2007). doi:10.1177/0306312706077367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massung, E., Coyle, D., Cater, K.: Using crowdsourcing to support pro-environmental community activism. In: Proceeding CHI ’13 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 371–380. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nold, C.: Bio mapping (2004). www.biomapping.net

    Google Scholar 

  • Nov, O., Arazy, O., Anderson, D.: Technology-mediated citizen science participation: a motivational model. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 249–256 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulos, E., Honicky, R.J.R., Hooker, B.: Citizen science: enabling participatory urbanism. In: Foth, M. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, pp. 414–436. Idea Group Inc, New York (2009). doi:10.1080/01944360903167661

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, C.: Community mapping. Cartogr. J. 44(2), 127–137 (2007). doi:10.1179/000870407X213440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., Torbert, W.: The action turn: toward a transformational social science. Concepts Transformation 6(1), 1–37 (2001). doi:10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., Estrin, D., Srivastava, M.: Recruitment Framework for Participatory Sensing Data Collections. In: Floreen, P., Kruger, A., Spasojevic, M. (eds.) 8th International Conference, Pervasive 2010, pp. 138–155. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., Shilton, K., Burke, J., Estrin, D., Hansen, M., Srivastava, M.: Using context annotated mobility profiles to recruit data collectors in participatory sensing. In: Choudhury, T., Quigley, A., Strang, T., Suginuma, K. (eds.) 4th International Symposium on Location and Context Awareness, pp. 52–69. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Resch, B.: People as sensors and collective sensing-contextual observations complementing geo-sensor network measurements. In: Krisp, J.M. (ed.) Progress in Location-Based Services, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, pp. 391–406. Springer, Berlin (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34203-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., Jacobs, D.: Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 217–226. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., Matsuo, Y.: Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceeding WWW ’10 Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 851–860. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R.C., Roy, S., Jain, S., Brunette, W.: Data MULEs: modeling and analysis of a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 1(2–3), 215–233 (2003). doi:10.1016/S1570-8705(03)00003-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, A.: Citizen sensing, social signals, and enriching human experience. IEEE Internet Comput. 13(4), 87–92 (2009). doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.77

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J.: A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24(9), 467–71 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, M., Abdelzaher, T., Szymanski, B.: Human-centric sensing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 370(1958), 176–197 (2012). doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0244

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tham, C.k., Luo, T.: Quality of contributed service and market equilibrium for participatory sensing. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), pp. 133–140. IEEE, Washington (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilak, S.: Real-world deployments of participatory sensing applications: current trends and future directions. ISRN Sens. Netw. 2013, Article ID 583165, 8 pp. (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/583165

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Y.C., Lai, W.T., Huang, C.F., Wu, F.J.: Using mobile mules for collecting data from an isolated wireless sensor network. In: 2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP), pp. 673–679. IEEE, Washington (2010). doi:10.1109/ICPP.2010.75

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuncay, G., Benincasa, G., Helmy, A.: Participant recruitment and data collection framework for opportunistic sensing: a comparative analysis. In: CHANTS ’13 Proceedings of the 8th ACM MobiCom Workshop on Challenged Networks, pp. 25–30. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Abdelzaher, T., Kaplan, L., Aggarwal, C.: On quantifying the accuracy of maximum likelihood estimation of participant reliability in social sensing. In: 8th International Workshop on Data Management for Sensor Networks (DMSN 2011), pp. 7–12. ACM, Seattle (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • WideTag: History (2012). http://www.widetag.com/widenoise/history

  • Wu, F.J., Huang, C.F., Tseng, Y.C.: Data gathering by mobile mules in a spatially separated wireless sensor network. In: 2009 Tenth International Conference on Mobile Data Management: Systems, Services and Middleware, pp. 293–298. IEEE, Washington (2009). doi:10.1109/MDM.2009.43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B.: Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Underst. Sci. 1, 281–304 (1992). doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Zhang, J., Roe, P.: Using reputation management in participatory sensing for data classification. Procedia Comput. Sci. 5, 190–197 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Zhang, J., Roe, P.: Reputation modelling in citizen science for environmental acoustic data analysis. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(3), 419–435 (2013). doi:10.1007/s13278-012-0087-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Adeel, U., Mccann, J.A.: Selfish mules: social profit maximization in sparse sensornets using rationally-selfish human relays. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 31(6), 1124–1134 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Nold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nold, C., Francis, L. (2017). Participatory Sensing: Recruiting Bipedal Platforms or Building Issue-centred Projects?. In: Loreto, V., et al. Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics