Searching Evidence

Chapter

Abstract

The quest for reviews suitable for inclusion in an umbrella review, an overview of reviews or in a meta-epidemiological study is a crucial step to ensure the validity of findings of evidence syntheses as well as to minimise publication bias or similar threats to accuracy. Dedicated databases are obviously a key starting point, such as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). Then, established filters can be used to search the more comprehensive, but potentially too extensive, general literature databases, such as MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase. Careful and early collaboration with an information specialist is recommended to optimise the yield and minimise the effort of searching evidence for an umbrella review.

Keywords

Database search Publication bias Reporting bias Search Search strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Julie Glanville, YHEC, for comments on an earlier draft.

References

  1. 1.
    Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in health care. York: University of York/Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009. Available from: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm.
  2. 2.
    Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]: the Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robinson KA, Whitlock EP, O’Neil ME, Anderson JK, Hartling L, Dryden DM, et al. Integration of existing systematic reviews into new reviews: identification of guidance needs. Syst Rev. 2014;3:60.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bunn F, Trivedi D, Alderson P, Hamilton L, Martin A, Iliffe S. The impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research. Syst Rev. 2014;3:125.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Montori V, Wilczynski N, Morgan D, Haynes R. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from MEDLINE: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330:68.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilczynski N, Haynes R, for the Hedges Team. EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:29–33.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee E, Dobbins M, DeCorby K, McRae L, Tirilis D, Husson H. An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:51.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.Centre for Reviews and DisseminationUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations