Abstract
Decision-making requires a delicate balance between values, expertise, resources and knowledge. Evidence is the objective dimension of knowledge which can be exploited for decision-making. As the human brain complexity is quite evident, so are evident the complexity and multifaceted feature of evidence informing decision-making in clinical medicine as well as in many different fields of humanity. In particular different sources of evidence can be identified, from less robust, precise and accurate to others which are more robust, more precise and more accurate. Yet, there is a continuum in the hierarchy of evidence, and it would be naïve to think that less formal sources of evidence should be disregarded altogether in comparison to more established and robust ones (i.e. randomised controlled trials). Similarly, other layers of evidence on top of randomised trials can be envisioned going to systematic reviews, to meta-analyses and to umbrella reviews. Only the explicit and conscientious integration of such multiple sources of evidence in a unifying framework can lead to effective and efficient decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.
Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. User’s guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies; 2008.
Burneo JG, Demaerschalk BM, Jenkins ME. Neurology: an evidence-based approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
Kahneman D, Tversky A. On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychol Rev. 1996;103:582–91.
Goldner JA. Metoprolol-induced visual hallucinations: a case series. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:65.
Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:54–60.
Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. User’s guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 2nd ed. London: AMA; 2002.
Montori VM, Smieja M, Guyatt GH. Publication bias: a brief review for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1284–8.
Biondi-Zoccai G, Abbate A, Benedetto U, Palmerini T, D’Ascenzo F, Frati G. Network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: what is it and why is it posed to dominate cardiovascular decision making? Int J Cardiol. 2015;182C:309–14.
Biondi-Zoccai G, editor. Network meta-analysis: evidence synthesis with mixed treatment comparison. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ng, C., Benedetto, U. (2016). Evidence Hierarchy. In: Biondi-Zoccai, G. (eds) Umbrella Reviews. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25653-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25655-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)