Skip to main content

Genetic Erosion: Context Is Key

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genetic Diversity and Erosion in Plants

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development and Biodiversity ((SDEB,volume 7))

Abstract

Genetic erosion is a useful concept for conservationists, collection curators, natural lands managers, and practitioners of restoration and revegetation. However, there is variation in how the term has been used and how faithfully it follows from the genetic concepts upon which it was based. Genetic erosion is the loss of genetic diversity—often magnified or accelerated by human activities. It can result from habitat loss and fragmentation, but it also can result from a narrow genetic base in the original populations or collections or by practices that reduce genetic diversity. Just as loss of diversity is relative (to some baseline condition), so too is the biological significance of that loss, the management implications, and the human-applied value. Thus we emphasize the context in this chapter’s treatment of genetic erosion. Although few species-specific guidelines are available, practitioners can minimize the risk of genetic erosion by being familiar with the biology of the affected species (including breeding system, mode of reproduction, and pattern of genetic diversity). Narrowly based genetic collections should be avoided, providers of plant materials for revegetation projects should offer information on their collection methods, and nursery managers should endeavor to minimize diversity losses at all stages of nursery culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bannister MH (1965) Sampling the pines of Guadalupe Island and Cedros Island. Internal Silviculture Report No. 49. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett E, Novak SJ, Mack RN (2002) Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): differentiation in the eastern United States. Am J Bot 89:602–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty GE, Reid N, Provan J (2014) Retrospective genetic monitoring of the threatened Yellow marsh saxifrage (Saxifraga hirculus) reveals genetic erosion but provides valuable insights for conservation strategies. Divers Distrib 20:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever J, Felber F (1992) The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. Oxford Sur Evol Biol 8:185–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2012) Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evol Appl 5:117–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AHD (2008) Indicators of genetic diversity, genetic erosion and genetic vulnerability for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Thematic Background Study for the Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1500e/i1500e20.pdf

  • Brown AHD, Briggs JD (1991) Sampling strategies for genetic variation in ex situ collections of endangered plant species 1. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds), Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 99–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AHD, Brubaker CL (2002) Indicators of sustainable management of plant genetic resources: how well are we doing? In: Engels JMM, Ramanatha Rao V, Brown AHD, Jackson MT (eds), Managing plant genetic diversity. CABI Publishing, Oxon, pp 249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Buis S (2000) Writing woody plant specifications for restoration and mitigation practices. Native Plants J 1:116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton TL, Husband BC (2000) Fitness differences among diploids, tetraploids, and their triploid progeny in Chamerion angustifolium: mechanisms of inviability and implications for polyploid evolution. Evolution 54:1182–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buza L, Young A, Thrall P (2000) Genetic erosion, inbreeding, and reduced fitness in fragmented populations of the endangered tetraploid pea Swainsona recta. Biol Conserv 93:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RK, Sorensen FC (1984) Genetic implications of nursery practices. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD (eds) Forest nursery manual: production of bare root seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 183–191

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (1992) Convention on biological diversity. Secretariat for the Convcention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec Canada. http://www.cbd.int/convention/text/

  • CBD (2001) Global Biodiversity Outlook 1. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec Canada. http://www.cbd.int/gbo1/default.shtml

  • CBD (2010) Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec Canada. http://www.cbd.int/sp/default.shtml

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10:783–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CNPS (2001) Guidelines for landscaping to protect native vegetation from genetic degradation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento CA. http://www.cnps.org/cnps/archive/landscaping.php

  • Cole CT (2003) Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:213–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPC (Center for Plant Conservation) (1991) Genetic sampling guidelines for conservation collections of endangered plants. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds), Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF (1993) Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Sur Evol Biol 9:3–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Demauro MM (1993) Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conserv Biol 7:542–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmands S, Timmerman CC (2003) Modeling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 17:883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Kassaby YA, Thomson AJ (1996) Parental rank change associated with seed biology and nursery practices in Douglas-fir. For Sci 42:228–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics (2nd edn). Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk DA (1987) Integrated conservation strategies for endangered plants. Nat Areas J 7:118–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) (1991) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1999) Global strategy for the management of farm animal genetic resources: executive brief. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/toolbox/indust/ex-brf.pdf

  • FAO (2007a) Global plan of action for animal genetic resources and the interlaken declaration. In: International technical conference on animal genetic resources for food and agriculture, Interlaken, Switzerland, 3–7 Sept 2007. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1404e/a1404e00.htm

  • FAO (2007b) The state of the world’s animal genetic resources. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1250e/a1250e00.htm

  • FAO (2010) The second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1500e/i1500e00.htm

  • FAO (2011) The second global plan of action for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. In: FAO Council, Rome, Italy, 29 Nov 2011. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2624e/i2624e00.htm

  • FAO (2014) The state of the world’s forest genetic resources. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3825e.pdf

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2004) A primer of conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ (1979) Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PS (2000) Patterns of variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. Am J Bot 87:783–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Given DR (1987) What the conservationist requires of ex situ collections. In: Branwell D, Hamann O, Heywood V, Synge H (eds) Botanic gardens and the world conservation strategy. Academic Press, London, pp 103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Glémin S (2003) How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57:2678–2687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning D (1989) Some aspects of autotetraploid population dynamics. Theor Appl Genet 78:233–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino L, Ramanatha Rao V, Reid R (eds) (1995) Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity: Technical Guidelines. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant EO (1992) Genetic and demographic considerations in the sampling and reintroduction of rare plants. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK (eds), Conservation biology: the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc., New York, pp 321–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant EO (1996) Designing populations: demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. In: Falk DA, Millar CI and Olwell M (eds), Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Island Press, Washington, pp 171–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant EO, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) (2004) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1990) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 43–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufford KM, Mazer SJ (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 18:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipkins VD, DeWoody J (2014) Isozyme data indicate variation in ploidy and significant genetic structure in Acanthomintha ilicifolia (gray) gray, San Diego thornmint. Revised report to the Center for Natural Lands Management, NFGEL Project #279

    Google Scholar 

  • ITPGRFA (2004) International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.planttreaty.org/content/texts-treaty-official-versions

  • Jensen DB, Torn MS, Hart J (1993) In our own hands: a strategy for conserving California’s biological diversity. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Karron JD (1987) A comparison of levels of genetc polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol Ecol 1:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karron JD (1991) Patterns of genetic variation and breeding systems in rare plant species. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds), Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler KH (2004) Impact of intraspecific polyploidy in Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) populations American. Midl Nat 152:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen SG, McArthur ED (2001) Native or not: subjective labels and their application in wildland plantings. Native Plants J 2:21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzmiller JH (1990) Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. For Ecol Manage 35:131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence MJ, Marshall DF, Davies P (1995) Genetics of genetic conservation, I, sample size when collecting germplasm. Euphytica 84:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conserv Biol 1:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledig FT (1987) Genetic structure and conservation of California’s endemic and near-endemic conifers. In: Elias TS (ed), Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, pp 587–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledig FT (1991) Secret extinctions: the loss of genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. In: Fenger MA, Miller EH, Johnson JA, Williams EJR (eds), Our living legacy: proceedings of a symposium on biological diversity. Victoria, pp. 127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledig FT (1992) Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63:87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder HP, Barker NP (2014) Does polyploidy facilitate long-distance dispersal? Ann Bot 113:1175–1183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB (1995) Restoration, revegetation, and the importance of genetic and evolutionary perspectives. In: Roundy BA, McArthur ED, Haley JS, Mann DK (eds), Proceedings: wildland shrub and arid land restoration symposium. General Technical Report INT-GTR-315. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, pp 271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt L, Anderson S, Epperson B (2013) San Diego thornmint seed and common garden study. Final report to the Center for Natural Lands Management, Temecula

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Gabriel W (1990) Genetic load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44:1725–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA, Miller KR, Reid WV, Mittermeier RA, and Werner TB (1990) Conserving the world’s biological diversity. World Conservation Union, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund-US, and the World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer SE, Kitchen SG (1994) Life history variation in blue flax (Linum perenne: Linaceae) seed germination phenology. Am J Bot 81:528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer SE, Monsen SB (1993) Genetic considerations in propagating native shrubs, forbs, and grasses from seed. In: Proceedings, Western Forest Nursery Association Symposium, Sept 14–18, 1992, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA. General Technical Report RM-GTR-221. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, pp 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar CI, Libby WJ (1989) Disneyland or native ecosystem: genetics and the restorationist. Restor Manage Notes 7:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappert RA, Hamrick JL, Donovan LA (2000) Genetic variation in Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), an introduced, clonal, invasive plant of the southeastern United States. Am J Bot 87:1240–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin D, Hauber DP (1999) Isozyme variation among populations of the clonal species, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel. Aquat Bot 63:241–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhartz JA (1995) Planting state-listed endangered and threatened plants. Conserv Biol 9:771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers DL, Ledig FT (1996) The status of temperate North American forest genetic resources. Report No. 16. University of California Genetic Resources Conservation Program, Davis. http://ucanr.edu/repository/view.cfm?article=54993

  • Rogers DL, Matheson AC, Vargas Hernández JJ, Guerra Santos JJ (2006) Genetic conservation of insular populations of Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don). Biodiver Conserv 15:779–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2445–2449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scarascia-Mugnozza GT, Perrino P (2002) The history of ex situ conservation and use of plant genetic resources. In: Engels JMM, Ramanatha Rao V, Brown AHD, Jackson MT (eds), Managing plant genetic diversity. CABI Publishing, Oxon, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid B (1994) Effects of genetic diversity in experimental stands of Solidago altissima: evidence for the potential role of pathogens as selective agents in plant populations. J Ecol 82:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecic DL, McBride JL, Bowles ML, Nickrent DL (1998) Genetic variability in the federal threatened Mead’s milkweed, Asclepias meadii Torrey (Asclepiadaceae), as determined by allozyme electrophoresis. Ann Mo Bot Gard 85:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR, Shaw K, Routman E, Davis SK (1990) The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 77:13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN, Nuismer SL, Merg K (2004) Plant polyploidy and the evolutionary ecology of plant/animal interactions. Biol J Linn Soc 82:511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5948–5953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1972) Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.Print.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503

  • Wang RL, Wendel JF, Dekker JH (1995) Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. I. Isozyme analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure in Setaria viridis. Am J Bot 82:308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SL (2001) Reduced genetic diversity in eelgrass transplantations affects both population growth and individual fitness. Ecol Appl 11:1472–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SL, Davis CA (1996) Population genetic analyses of transplanted eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds reveal reduced genetic diversity in southern California. Restor Ecol 4:163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This chapter is based on a 2004 paper published in Native Plants Journal by DL Rogers (Genetic erosion: No longer just an agricultural issue, 5(2):112–122). The text has been revisited, updated, and enlarged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Rogers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, D., McGuire, P. (2015). Genetic Erosion: Context Is Key. In: Ahuja, M., Jain, S. (eds) Genetic Diversity and Erosion in Plants. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25637-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics