Advertisement

The Network Architecture for Spectrum Trading

  • Miao Pan
  • Ming Li
  • Pan Li
  • Yuguang Fang
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering book series (BRIEFSELECTRIC)

Abstract

In this chapter, we first describe the motivation for the spectrum trading and briefly summarize the state-of-art research about spectrum trading. Then, we present the research challenges for the spectrum trading in multi-hop cognitive radio networks (CRNs). To address those challenges, we introduce a novel network architecture design for spectrum trading in multi-hop CRNs. The proposed CRN architecture design facilitates the opportunistic spectrum accessing of secondary users (SUs) without cognitive radio (CR) capability, helps to harvest and allocate the available spectrum in efficient way, improves the quality of services (QoS) of multi-hop CR communications, and provides possible approach to guarantee the economic properties of spectrum trading. Under this CRN architecture, we also give content outlines for the rest of the three chapters.

Keywords

Network Architecture QoS; End-to-End Performance; Economic Properties 

References

  1. 1.
    IEEE 802.22-2011(TM) Standard for Cognitive Wireless Regional Area Networks (RAN) for Operation in TV Bands, July 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Akyildiz, W. Lee, M. Vuran, and M. Shantidev. Next generation/ dynamic spectrum access/ cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Computer Networks (Elsevier) Journal, 50(4):2127–2159, September 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Bian, J.-M. Park, and R. Chen. Control channel establishment in cognitive radio networks using channel hopping. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(4):689–703, April 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Cao and H. Zheng. Distributed spectrum allocation via local bargaining. In Proc. of IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON, 2005, Santa Clara, CA, Sept. 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Chen, S. Yin, Q. Zhang, M. Liu, and S. Li. Mining spectrum usage data: a large-scale spectrum measurement study. In Proc. of international conference on Mobile computing and networking, ACM Mobicom, 2009, Beijing, China, September 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Chen, J.-M. Park, and J. H. Reed. Defense against primary user emulation attacks in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(1), January 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Deek, X. Zhou, K. Almeroth, and H. Zheng. To preempt or not: Tackling bid and time-based cheating in online spectrum auctions. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2011, Shanghai, China, April 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The neXt generation program (XG) official website.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Ding, T. Melodia, S. Batalama, and J. Matyjas. Distributed routing, relay selection, and spectrum allocation in cognitive and cooperative ad hoc networks. In Proc. of IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON, 2010, Boston, MA, June 2010.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Duan, J. Huang, and B. Shou. Cognitive mobile virtual network operator: Investment and pricing with supply uncertainty. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2010, San Diego, CA, March 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    FCC. Spectrum policy task force report. Report of Federal Communications Commission, Et docket No. 02-135, November 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. Feng and Y. Yang. Joint transport, routing and spectrum sharing optimization for wireless networks with frequency-agile radios. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2009, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Gandhi, C. Buragohain, L. Cao, H. Zheng, and S. Suri. A general framework for wireless spectrum auctions. In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DySPAN 2007, Dublin, Ireland, April 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Ganesan and Y. G. Li. Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio: Part i: two user networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6:2204–2213, June 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Gao, Y. Shi, Y. T. Hou, H. D. Sherali, and H. Zhou. Multicast communications in multi-hop cognitive radio networks. to appear in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2011.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Giupponi, R. Agusti, J. Perez-Romero, and O. S. Roig. A novel approach for joint radio resource management based on fuzzy neural methodology. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(3):1789–1805, May 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Grandblaise, P. Bag, P. Levine, K. Moessner, and M. Pan. Microeconomics inspired mechanisms to manage dynamic spectrum allocation. In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DySPAN 2007, Dublin, Ireland, April 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    O. Guillermo. Game Theory (3rd ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Haykin. Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, 23(2):201–220, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Y. T. Hou, Y. Shi, and H. D. Sherali. Optimal spectrum sharing for multi-hop software defined radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2007, Anchorage, AL, May 2007.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. T. Hou, Y. Shi, and H. D. Sherali. Spectrum sharing for multi-hop networking with cognitive radios. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(1):146–155, January 2008.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Jia, Q. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and M. Liu. Revenue generation for truthful spectrum auction in dynamic spectrum access. In Proc. of ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, ACM MobiHoc, 2009, New Orleans, LA, May 2009.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Kim and K. G. Shin. Efficient discovery of spectrum opportunities with mac-layer sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(5):533–545, May 2008.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    W.-Y. Lee and I. F. Akyildiz. Optimal spectrum sensing framework for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(10):3845–3857, October 2008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. F. Lo. A survey of common control channel design in cognitive radio networks. Physical Communication, 4(1):26–39, March 2011.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. A. McHenry, P. A. Tenhula, D. McCloskey, D. A. Roberson, and C. S. Hood. Chicago spectrum occupancy measurements and analysis and a long-term studies proposal. In Proc. of TAPAS 2006, Boston, MA, August 2006.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. M. Mishra, D. Cabric, C. Chang, D. Willkomm, B. V. Schewick, A. Wolisz, and R. W. Brodersen. A real time cognitive radio testbed for physical and link layer experiments. In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DySPAN 2005, Baltimore, MD, November 2005.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Mitola. Cognitive radio: An integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, May 2000.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Niyato and E. Hossain. Competitive pricing for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: Dynamic game, inefficiency of nash equilibrium, and collusion. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(1):192–202, January 2008.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Niyato, E. Hossain, and Z. Han. Dynamics of multiple-seller and multiple-buyer spectrum trading in cognitive radio networks: A game theoretic modeling approach. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(8):1009–1022, Aug. 2009.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Pan, F. Chen, X. Yin, and Y. Fang. Fair profit allocation in the spectrum auction using the shapley value. In Proc. of IEEE Global telecommunications conference, Globecom 2009, Honolulu, HI, USA, December 2009.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Pan, J. Chen, R. Liu, and P. Zhang. Dynamic spectrum access and joint radio resource management combing for resource allocation in cooperative networks. In Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference, WCNC ’07, Hong Kong, March 2007.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Pan and Y. Fang. Bargaining based pairwise cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM ’08, San Diego, CA, USA, November 2008.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Pan, R. Huang, and Y. Fang. Cost design for opportunistic multi-hop routing in cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM ’08, San Diego, CA, USA, November 2008.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Pan, P. Li, and Y. Fang. Cooperative communication aware link scheduling for cognitive vehicular ad-hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30(4):760–768, May 2012.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Pan, P. Li, Y. Song, Y. Fang, and P. Lin. Spectrum clouds: A session based spectrum trading system for multi-hop cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2012, Orlando, FL, March 2012.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Pan, S. Liang, H. Xiong, J. Chen, and G. Liu. A novel bargaining based dynamic spectrum management scheme in reconfigurable systems. In Proc. of International Conference on Systems and Networks Communications, ICSNC 2006, Tahiti, French Polynesia, November 2006.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. Pan, Y. Long, H. Yue, Y. Fang, and H. Li. Multicast throughput optimization and fair spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Global telecommunications conference, Globecom 2012, Anaheim, CA, December 2012.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Pan, Y. Song, P. Li, and Y. Fang. Reward and risk for opportunistic spectrum accessing in cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Global telecommunications conference, Globecom 2009, Miami, FL, December 2010.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Pan, J. Sun, and Y. Fang. Purging the back-room dealing: Secure spectrum auction leveraging paillier cryptosystem. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(4), April 2011.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Pan, H. Yue, Y. Fang, and H. Li. The x loss: Band-mix selection for opportunistic spectrum accessing with uncertain supply from primary service providers. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 11(12):2133–2144, December 2012.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    M. Pan, H. Yue, C. Zhang, and Y. Fang. Path selection under budget constraints in multi-hop cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 99(PrePrints), 2012.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. Pan, C. Zhang, P. Li, and Y. Fang. Joint routing and scheduling for cognitive radio networks under uncertain spectrum supply. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2011, Shanghai, China, April 2011.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    M. Pan, C. Zhang, P. Li, and Y. Fang. Spectrum harvesting and sharing in multi-hop cognitive radio networks under uncertain spectrum supply. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30(2):369–378, February 2012.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    M. Pan, X. Zhu, and Y. Fang. Using homomorphic encryption to secure the combinatorial spectrum auction without the trustworthy auctioneer. Wireless Networks, 18(2):113–128, February 2012.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. H. Reed. Software Radio: A Modern Approach to Radio Engineering. Prentice Hall, New York, May 2002.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    S. Sengupta and M. Chatterjee. An economic framework for dynamic spectrum access and service pricing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 17(4):1200–1213, Aug. 2009.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Y. Shi and Y. T. Hou. A distributed optimization algorithm for multi-hop cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2008, Phoenix, AZ, April 2008.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    K. Shin, H. Kim, A. Min, and A. Kumar. Cognitive radios for dynamic spectrum access: from concept to reality. Wireless Communications, IEEE, 17(6):64–74, 2010.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    H. So, A. Tkachenko, and R. W. Brodersen. A unified hardware/software runtime environment for FPGA based reconfigurable computers using borph. In Proc. of International Conference on Hardware-Software Codesign and System Synthesis, Seoul, Korea, October 2006.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Y. Song, Y. Fang, and Y. Zhang. Stochastic channel selection in cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of IEEE Global telecommunications conference, Globecom 2007, Washington, DC, November 2007.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Y. Song, C. Zhang, and Y. Fang. Stochastic traffic engineering in multi-hop cognitive wireless mesh networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 9(3):305–316, March 2010.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J. Tang, S. Misra, and G. Xue. Spectrum allocation and scheduling in dynamic spectrum access wireless networks. In Proc. of the International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, QShine 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 2007.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    J. Tang, S. Misra, and G. Xue. Joint spectrum allocation and scheduling for fair spectrum sharing in cognitive radio wireless networks. Computer Networks (Elsevier) Journal, 52(11):2148–2158, August 2008.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    B. Wang, Z. Han, and K. J. R. Liu. Distributed relay selection and power control for multiuser cooperative communication networks using buyer/seller game. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2007, Anchorage, AK, May 2007.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Y. Wu, B. Wang, K. J. Liu, and T. Clancy. A multi-winner cognitive spectrum auction framework with collusion-resistant mechanisms. In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DySPAN ’08, Chicago, IL, October 2008.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Y. Xing, R. Chandramouli, and C. Cordeiro. Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(3):613–621, April 2007.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    D. Xu, E. Jung, and X. Liu. Optimal bandwidth selection in multi-channel cognitive radio networks: How much is too much? In Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DySPAN 2008, Chicago, IL, October 2008.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    J. Zhang and Q. Zhang. Stackelberg game for utility-based cooperative cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, ACM MobiHoc, 2009, New Orleans, LA, May 2009.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    X. Zhou, S. Gandhi, S. Suri, and H. Zheng. ebay in the sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions. In Proc. of Mobile Computing and Networking, Mobicom ’08, San Francisco, CA, September 2008.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    X. Zhou and H. Zheng. Trust: A general framework for truthful double spectrum auctions. In Proc. of INFOCOM 2009, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 2009.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    X. Zhou and H. Zheng. Breaking bidder collusion in large-scale spectrum auctions. In Proc. of ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, ACM MobiHoc, 2010, Chicago, IL, September 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miao Pan
    • 1
  • Ming Li
    • 2
  • Pan Li
    • 3
  • Yuguang Fang
    • 4
  1. 1.University of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.University of NevadaRenoUSA
  3. 3.Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  4. 4.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations