Airborne and Spaceborne Remote Sensing and Digital Image Analysis in Archaeology

  • Karsten LambersEmail author
Part of the Natural Science in Archaeology book series (ARCHAEOLOGY)


Remote sensing has a long and successful track record of detecting and mapping archaeological traces of human activity in the landscape. Since the early twentieth century, the tools and procedures of aerial archaeology evolved gradually, while earth observation remote sensing experienced major steps of technological and methodological advancements and innovation that today enable the monitoring of the earth’s surface at unprecedented accuracy, resolution and complexity. Much of the remote sensing data acquired in this process potentially holds important information about the location and context of archaeological sites and objects. Archaeology has started to make use of this tremendous potential by developing new approaches for the detection and mapping of archaeological traces based on digital remote sensing data and the associated tools and procedures. This chapter reviews the history, tools, methods, procedures and products of archaeological remote sensing and digital image analysis, emphasising recent trends towards convergence of aerial archaeology and earth observation remote sensing.


Remote sensing Digital image analysis Archaeological prospection Object detection 


  1. Abrams MJ, Comer DC (2013) Multispectral and hyperspectral technology and archaeological applications. In: Comer DC, Harrower MJ (eds) Mapping archaeological landscapes from space. Springer, New York, pp 57–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agapiou A, Alexakis DD, Hadjimitsis DG (2014) Spectral sensitivity of ALOS, ASTER, IKONOS, LANDSAT and SPOT satellite imagery intended for the detection of archaeological crop marks. Int J Digital Earth 7:351–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agapiou A, Alexakis DD, Simon FX, Kalayci T, Papadopoulos N, Sarris A, Hadjimitsis D (2015) Extraction of archaeological information using high resolution FormoSAT-2 data. Int J Herit Digital Era 4:241–255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agapiou A, Alexakis DD, Sarris A, Hadjimitsis DG (2016) Colour to greyscale pixels: re-seeing greyscale archived aerial photographs and declassified satellite CORONA images based on image fusion techniques. Archaeol Prospect 23:231–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck A (2011) Archaeological applications of multi/hyper-spectral data – challenges and potential. In: Cowley DC (ed) Remote sensing for archaeological heritage management. Occasional Publication of the Aerial Archaeology Research Group No. 3. Europae Archaeologia Consilium, Brussels, pp 87–97Google Scholar
  6. Bennett R, Cowley D, De Laet V (2014) The data explosion: tackling the taboo of automatic feature recognition in airborne survey data. Antiquity 88:896–905. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bevan A (2015) The data deluge. Antiquity 89:1473–1484. Scholar
  8. Brophy K, Cowley D (eds) (2005) From the air: understanding aerial archaeology. Tempus, StroudGoogle Scholar
  9. Campana S (2017a) Remote sensing in archaeology. In: Gilbert AS (ed) Encyclopedia of geoarchaeology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 703–725. Google Scholar
  10. Campana S (2017b) Drones in archaeology. State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Archaeol Prospect. doi:
  11. Casana J (2014) Regional-scale archaeological remote sensing in the age of Big Data. Adv Archaeol Pract 2:222–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casana J, Cothren J (2008) Stereo analysis, DEM extraction and orthorectification of CORONA satellite imagery: archaeological applications from the Near East. Antiquity 82:732–749. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caspari G, Balz T, Gang L, Wang X, Liao M (2014) Application of Hough Forests for the detection of grave mounds in high-resolution satellite imagery. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE geoscience and remote sensing symposium, pp 906–909.
  14. Cerrillo-Cuenca E (2017) An approach to the automatic surveying of prehistoric barrows through LiDAR. Quat Int 435B:135–145.
  15. Corsi C, Slapšak B, Vermeulen F (eds) (2013) Good practice in archaeological diagnostics: non-invasive survey of complex archaeological sites. Springer, Cham. Google Scholar
  16. Cowley DC (2012) In with the new, out with the old? Auto-extraction for remote sensing archaeology. In: Bostater CR Jr, Mertikas SP, Neyt X, Nichol C, Cowley DC, Bruyant JP (eds) Remote sensing of the ocean, sea ice, coastal waters, and large water regions 853206. Proceedings of SPIE 8532. SPIE, Dresden. Google Scholar
  17. Cowley DC (2016) What do the patterns mean? Archaeological distributions and bias in survey data. In: Forte M, Campana S (eds) Digital methods and remote sensing in archaeology. Springer, Cham, pp 147–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowley DC, Stichelbaut BB (2012) Historical aerial photographic archives for European archaeology. Eur J Archaeol 15:217–236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowley DC, Standring RA, Abicht MJ (eds) (2010) Landscapes through the lens: aerial photographs and historic environment. Occasional Publication of the Aerial Archaeology Research Group No. 2. Oxbow Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Crutchley S, Crow P (2009) The light fantastic: using airborne laser scanning in archaeological survey. English Heritage, SwindonGoogle Scholar
  21. Day DA, Logsdon JM, Latell B (eds) (1998) Eye in the sky: the story of the CORONA spy satellites. Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. De Laet V, Paulissen E, Waelkens M (2007) Methods for the extraction of archaeological features from very high-resolution Ikonos-2 remote sensing imagery, Hisar (southwest Turkey). J Archaeol Sci 34:830–841. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Laet V, Paulissen E, Meuleman K, Waelkens M (2009) Effects of image characteristics on the identification and extraction of archaeological features from Ikonos-2 and Quickbird-2 imagery: case study Sagalassos (southwest Turkey). Int J Remote Sens 30:5655–5668. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dietre B, Walser C, Lambers K, Reitmaier T, Hajdas I, Haas JN (2014) Palaeoecological evidence for Mesolithic to Medieval climatic change and anthropogenic impact on the Alpine flora and vegetation of the Silvretta Massif (Switzerland/Austria). Quat Int 353:3–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dietre B, Walser C, Kofler W, Kothieringer K, Hajdas I, Lambers K, Reitmaier T, Haas JN (2017) Neolithic to Bronze Age (4850–3450 cal. BP) fire management of the Alpine Lower Engadine landscape (Switzerland) to establish pastures and cereal fields. Holocene 27:181–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doneus M (2013) Die hinterlassene Landschaft – Prospektion und Interpretation in der Landschaftsarchäologie. Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission 78. Austrian Academy of Sciences, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  27. Doneus M, Verhoeven G, Atzberger C, Wess M, Rus M (2014) New ways to extract archaeological information from hyperspectral pixels. J Archaeol Sci 52:84–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doneus M, Wieser M, Verhoeven G, Karel W, Fera M, Pfeifer N (2016) Automated archiving of archaeological aerial mages. Remote Sens 8:209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Donoghue D, Beck A, Galiatsatos N, McManus K, Philips G (2006) The use of remote sensing data for visualising and interpreting archaeological landscapes. In: Baltsavias E, Gruen A, van Gool L, Pateraki M (eds) Recording, modeling and visualization of cultural heritage. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 317–326Google Scholar
  30. Fowler MJF (2013) Declassified intelligence satellite photographs. In: Hanson WS, Oltean IA (eds) Archaeology from historical aerial and satellite archives. Springer, New York, pp 47–66. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gattiglia G (2015) Think big about data: archaeology and the Big Data challenge. Archäologische Informationen 38:113–124.
  32. Giardino MJ (2011) A history of NASA remote sensing contributions to archaeology. J Archaeol Sci 38:2003–2009. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goossens R, De Wulf A, Bourgeois J, Gheyle W, Willems T (2006) Satellite imagery and archaeology: the example of CORONA in the Altai mountains. J Archaeol Sci 33:745–755. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grosman L (2016) Reaching the point of no return: the computational revolution in archaeology. Annu Rev Anthropol 45:129–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gutiérrez G, Searcy MT (eds) (2016) Special issue: Drones in archaeology. SAA Archaeol Rec 16Google Scholar
  36. Hanson WS (2010) The future of aerial archaeology in Europe. Photo Interprétation. Eur J Appl Remote Sens 46:3–11Google Scholar
  37. Hanson WS, Oltean IA (eds) (2013) Archaeology from historical aerial and satellite archives. Springer, New York. Google Scholar
  38. Horne PD (2009) A strategy for the national mapping programme. English Heritage, SwindonGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnson JK (ed) (2006) Remote sensing in archaeology: an explicitly North American perspective. University of Alabama Press, TuscaloosaGoogle Scholar
  40. Kothieringer K, Walser C, Dietre B, Reitmaier T, Haas JN, Lambers K (2015) High impact: early pastoralism and environmental change during the Neolithic and Bronze Age in the Silvretta Alps (Switzerland/Austria) as evidenced by archaeological, palaeoecological and pedological proxies. Z Geomorphol 59(2):177–198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lambers K, Eisenbeiss H, Sauerbier M, Kupferschmidt D, Gaisecker T, Sotoodeh S, Hanusch T (2007) Combining photogrammetry and laser scanning for the recording and modelling of the Late Intermediate Period site of Pinchango Alto, Palpa, Peru. J Archaeol Sci 34:1702–1712. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lasaponara R, Masini N (eds) (2012) Satellite remote sensing: a new tool for archaeology. Springer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar
  43. Leckebusch J (2005) Aerial archaeology: a full digital workflow for aerial photography. Archaeol Prospect 12:235–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436–444. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lemmens M (2011) Digital aerial cameras. GIM Int 25(4):18–25Google Scholar
  46. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2015) Remote sensing and image interpretation, 7th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Lin AYM, Huynh A, Lanckriet G, Barrington L (2014) Crowdsourcing the unknown: the satellite search for Genghis Khan. PLoS One 9(12):e114046. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Menze BH, Ur JA (2012) Mapping patterns of long-term settlement in Northern Mesopotamia at a large scale. PNAS 109(14):E778–E787. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, McClone JC (2001) Introduction to modern photogrammetry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Musson C, Palmer R, Campana S (2013) Flights into the past: aerial photography, photo interpretation and mapping for archaeology. Occasional Publication No. 4 of the Aerial Archaeology Research Group. Accessed 3 Feb 2017.
  51. Palmer R (2005) If they used their own photographs they wouldn’t take them like that. In: Brophy K, Cowley DC (eds) From the air: understanding aerial archaeology. Tempus, Stroud, pp 94–116Google Scholar
  52. Parcak SH (2009) Satellite remote sensing for archaeology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Remondino F (2011) Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sens 3:1104–1138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Remondino F, Gehrke M (2015) Oblique aerial imagery – a review. In: Fritsch D (ed) Photogrammetric week ’15. Wichmann, Berlin, pp 75–84Google Scholar
  55. Richards JA, Jia X (2006) Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction, 4th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  56. Schneider A, Takla M, Nicolay A, Raab A, Raab T (2015) A template-matching approach combining morphometric variables for automated mapping of charcoal kiln sites. Archaeol Prospect 22:45–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schuetter J, Goel P, McCorriston J, Park J, Senn M, Harrower M (2013) Autodetection of ancient Arabian tombs in high-resolution satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens 34:6611–6635. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sevara C, Pregesbauer M, Doneus M, Verhoeven G, Trinks I (2016) Pixel versus object – a comparison of strategies for the semi-automated mapping of archaeological features using airborne laser scanning data. J Archaeol Sci Rep 5:485–498. Google Scholar
  59. Sever TL (1990) Remote sensing applications in archeological research: tracing prehistoric human impact upon the environment. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado. University Microfilms, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  60. Stewart C, Rast M, Sarti F, Arino O (2015) ESA activities in earth observation for cultural heritage applications. Int J Herit Digital Era 4:325–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Traviglia A (2007) MIVIS hyperspectral sensors for the detection and GIS supported interpretation of subsoil archaeological sites. In: Clark JT, Hagemeister EM (eds) Digital discovery: exploring new frontiers in human heritage. CAA 2006 Fargo. Archaeolingua, Budapest, pp 287–299Google Scholar
  62. Traviglia A, Cowley DC, Lambers K (2016) Finding common ground: human and computer vision in archaeological prospection. AARGnews 53:11–24. Accessed 3 Feb 2017Google Scholar
  63. Trier ØD, Pilø LH (2012) Automatic detection of pit structures in airborne laser scanning data. Archaeol Prospect 19:103–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Trier ØD, Larsen SØ, Solberg R (2009) Automatic detection of circular structures in high-resolution satellite images of agricultural land. Archaeol Prospect 16:1–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trier ØD, Zortea M, Tonning C (2015) Automatic detection of mound structures in airborne laser scanning data. J Archaeol Sci Rep 2:69–79. Google Scholar
  66. Trier ØD, Salberg AB, Pilø LH (2017) Semi-automatic mapping of charcoal kilns from airborne laser scanning data using deep learning. In: Uleberg E, Matsumoto M (eds) Proceedings of the 44th annual conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (CAA 2016)Google Scholar
  67. Trümpler C (2005) Aerial photography in archaeology and its pioneers. In: Trümpler C (ed) The past from above: photographs by Georg Gerster. Frances Lincoln, London, pp 9–23Google Scholar
  68. Verhoeven G (2008) Imaging the invisible using modified digital still cameras for straightforward and low-cost archaeological near-infrared photography. J Archaeol Sci 35:3087–3100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Verhoeven G (2009) Providing an archaeological bird’s eye view – an overall picture of ground-based means to execute low-altitude aerial photography (LAAP) in archaeology. Archaeol Prospect 16:233–249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Verhoeven G (2012) Near-infrared crop mark archaeology: from its historical use to current digital implementations. J Archaeol Method Theory 19:132–160. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Verhoeven G, Sevara C (2016) Trying to break new ground in aerial archaeology. Remote Sens 8:918. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Verhoeven G, Sevara C, Karel W, Ressl C, Doneus M, Briese C (2013) Undistorting the past: new techniques for orthorectification of archaeological aerial frame imagery. In: Corsi C, Slapšak B, Vermeulen F (eds) Good practice in archaeological diagnostics: non-invasive survey of complex archaeological sites. Springer, Cham, pp 31–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vletter WF (2014) (Semi-)automatic extraction from Airborne Laser Scan data of roads and paths in forested areas. In: Hadjimitsis DG, Themistocleous K, Michaelides S, Papadavid G (eds) Second international conference on remote sensing and geoinformation of the environment (RSCy2014), Proceedings of SPIE 9229. SPIE, Paphos 92291D.
  74. Wiseman J, El-Baz F (eds) (2007) Remote sensing in archaeology. Springer, New York. Google Scholar
  75. Zingman I (2016) Semi-automated detection of fragmented rectangular structures in high resolution remote sensing images with application in archaeology. PhD dissertation, University of Konstanz. Accessed 3 Feb 2017
  76. Zingman I, Saupe D, Lambers K (2014) A morphological approach for distinguishing texture and individual features in images. Pattern Recogn Lett 47:129–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zingman I, Saupe D, Penatti OAB, Lambers K (2016) Detection of fragmented rectangular enclosures in very high resolution remote sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54:4580–4593. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations