Skip to main content

Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Interventional Critical Care

Abstract

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is an invasive procedure, predominantly of historical significance, used to diagnose hemoperitoneum or bowel injury in patients who have experienced blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma. This procedure is now primarily used in hemodynamically unstable patients cared for in resource-constrained environments, to determine the need for exploratory laparotomy. Due to the rapidly progressing use of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and computed tomography (CT), DPL is no longer considered the primary modality for diagnosing blood in the abdominal cavity and has been removed from ATLS guidelines. The only absolute contraindication is an obvious need for laparotomy. Relative contraindications include coagulopathy, prior abdominal surgeries, abdominal wall infections, pregnancy, and morbid obesity. DPL can be done via two different approaches: open or closed. The most common technique is closed with modified Seldinger technique. The procedure can be performed through either infraumbilical or supraumbilical locations. The most common location is infraumbilical. Positive findings during a DPL indicate a need for emergent exploratory laparotomy for the hemodynamically unstable patient. Positive findings include >10 cc of frank blood or enteric contents aspirated during phase 1 of the procedure or >100,000 RBC/mm3 and/or >500 WBC/mm3 during phase 2 of the procedure. When resources are limited, DPL can be a useful procedure when determining the need for exploratory laparotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Root HD, Hauser CW, McKinley CR, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Surgery. 1965;57:633–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar S, Kumar A, Joshi MK, Rathi V. Comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and focused assessment by sonography in trauma as an adjunct to primary survey in torso trauma: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014;20(2):101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen JO, Logie JR. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage-an obituary. Br J Surg. 2005;92:517–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jagminas L, Kulkarni, R, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Medscape [updated 2014 Mar 21]. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/82888-overview. Accessed 18 Sep 2014.

  5. Falcone RE, Thomas B, Hrutkay L. Safety and efficacy of diagnostic peritoneal lavage performed by supervised surgical and emergency medicine residents. Eur J Emerg Med. 1997;4:150–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoff WS, Holevar M, Nagy KK, Patterson L, Young JS, Arrillaga A, Najarian MP, Valenziano CP. Practice management guidelines for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: the EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma. 2002;53:602–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgson NF, Stewart TC, Girotti MJ. Open or closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage for abdominal trauma? A meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2000;48(6):1091–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feliciano DV. Diagnostic modalities in abdominal trauma. Peritoneal lavage, ultrasonography, computed tomography scanning, and arteriography. Surg Clin North Am. 1991;71:241–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ekeh AP, Saxe J, Walusimbi M, et al. Diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric injury in the era of multidetector CT technology—are results better? J Trauma. 2008;65(2):354–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jahadi MR. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. J Trauma. 1972;12(11):936–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McKenny M, Lentz K, Nunez D, et al. Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma? J Trauma. 1994;37(3):439–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Monzon-Torres BI, Ortega-Gonzalez M. Penetrating abdominal trauma. S Afr J Sci. 2004;42(1):11–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marx JA. Blunt abdominal trauma: priorities, procedures and pragmatic thinking. Emerg Med Pract. 2001;3(5):1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thacker LK, Parks J, Thal E. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: is 100,000 RBCs a valid figure for penetrating abdominal trauma? J Trauma. 2007;62(4):853–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Meissen ACNP, CCRN, FCCM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meissen, H., McConnell, K. (2016). Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage. In: Taylor, D., Sherry, S., Sing, R. (eds) Interventional Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25286-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25286-5_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25284-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25286-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics