International Conference on Conceptual Modeling

Conceptual Modeling pp 358-366 | Cite as

Dynamic Capabilities for Sustainable Enterprise IT – A Modeling Framework

  • Mohammad Hossein Danesh
  • Pericles Loucopoulos
  • Eric Yu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9381)

Abstract

A key consideration of researchers and practitioners alike in the field of information systems engineering is the co-development of information systems and business structures and processes that are in alignment, that this alignment reflects the challenges presented by the business ecologies and that the developed systems are sustainable through appropriate responses to pressures for their evolution. These challenges inevitably need to be addressed through development schemes that recognize the intertwining of information systems, business strategy and their ecosystems. The paper presents the conceptual modeling foundations of such a scheme providing a detailed exposition of the issues and solutions for sustainable systems in which Capability plays an integrative role using examples from an industrial-size application. The contribution of the paper is on its proposition of conceptual modeling techniques that are applicable to both business strategies and information systems development.

Keywords

Capability modeling Enterprise engineering Sustainability 

References

  1. 1.
    Jarke, M., Loucopoulos, P., Lyytinen, K., Mylopoulos, J., Robinson, W.: The brave new world of design requirements. Inf. Syst. 36, 992–1008 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bleistein, S.J., Cox, K., Verner, J., Phalp, K.T.: B-SCP: a requirements analysis framework for validating strategic alignment of organisational IT based on strategy, context and process. Inf. Softw. Technol. 46, 846–868 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sousa, H.P., do Prado Leite, J.C.S.: Modeling organizational alignment. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 407–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ulrich, W., Rosen, M.: The business capability map: the “Rosetta Stone” of business/IT alignment. Enterp. Archit. 14 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bērziša, S., Bravos, G., Gonzalez, T., Czubayko, U., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koc, H., Kuhr, J.-C., Llorca, C., Loucopoulos, P., Juanes, R., Pastor, O., Sandkuhl, K., Simic, H., Stirna, J., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57, 15–25 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leonard-Barton, D.: Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg. Manag. J. 13, 111–125 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17, 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cook, D.: Business-capability mapping: staying ahead of the Joneses, MSDN library (2007). http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb402954.aspx
  10. 10.
    Greski, L.: Business capability modeling: theory & practice. Architecture & Governance (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harmon, P.: Capabilities and processes. BPTrends (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDonald, M.P.: Capability is more powerful than process (2009). http://blogs.gartner.com/mark_mcdonald/2009/07/02/capability-is-more-powerful-than-process
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Frey, F.J., Hentrich, C., Zdun, U.: Capability-based service identification in service-oriented legacy modernization. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP), Kloster Irsee, Germany (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Homann, U.: A business-oriented foundation for service orientation. Microsoft Developer Network (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wittle, R.: Examining capabilities as architecture. BPTrends (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosen, M.: Business architecture: are capabilities architecture? BPTrends (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azevedo, C.L.B., Iacob, M.-E., Almeida, J.P.A., van Sinderen, M., Ferreira Pires, L., Guizzardi, G.: An ontology-based well-founded proposal for modeling resources and capabilities in ArchiMate. In: 2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 39–48 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kavakli, E.V., Loucopoulos, P.: Focus issue on legacy information systems and business process engineering: modelling of organisational change using the EKD framework. Commun. AIS 2 (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu, E.S.: Social modeling and i*. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 99–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zollo, M., Winter, S.G.: Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13, 339–351 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Danesh, M.H., Yu, E.: Modeling enterprise capabilities with i*: reasoning on alternatives. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE Workshops 2014. LNBIP, vol. 178, pp. 112–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Hossein Danesh
    • 1
  • Pericles Loucopoulos
    • 2
  • Eric Yu
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Manchester Business SchoolThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Faculty of InformationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations