Advertisement

A New Kind of Map for a New Kind of World: 1919, the Peace, and the Rise of Geographical Cartography

  • Peter NekolaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

The years immediately following the First World War saw an increasingly widespread acceptance of a concept of the geographical understood not as the description of location, but as the study of the earth’s surface conditions. This concept was philosophically unique in several ways. Firstly, representing conditions did not entail representing discrete units or objects with fixed or necessary identities. Conditions were understood as neither purely subjective nor objective but as dynamic phenomena subject to informed interpretation. Secondly, maps were designed and arranged to encourage correlation among such conditions, thus making substantive geographical knowledge of an area possible. This correlation process and the maps it employed did not assume or represent discrete political units, empires, or nations, as essential categories. Arguably, this concept of the geographical effectively constituted a critique of such units, ultimately regarding them as inadequate assumptions for substantive geographical study. I suggest that the timing of the articulation of this “geographical cartography” was no coincidence. A profound dissatisfaction with territorial thinking as a worldview had been a strong intellectual current after the War, as was the appeal of increasingly compelling alternatives. The articulation of geographical cartography and the concomitant rejection of territorial maps in many publications after the War may be considered an example of such dissatisfaction.

Keywords

Time Survey Geographical Study Geographical Knowledge Territorial Claim Geographical Reasoning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bloch M (1931) Les caractères originaux de l’histoire rurale français. Les Belles-Lettres, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowman I (1921) The New World. Problems in Political Geography. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman I (1934) Geography in Relation to the Social Sciences. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell FG (1970) The Struggle for Upper Silesia, 1919–1922. J Mod Hist 42(3):361–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamberlain TG (1919) Why We Fought. League to Enforce Peace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Crampton J (2006) The cartographic calculation of space. Race mapping and the Balkans at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. Soc Cult Geogr 7(5):731–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Febvre L (1924 [1923]) A Geographical Introduction to History. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Fink C (1989) Marc Bloch. A Life in History. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Goode JP (1919) What the War Should Do for Our Methods in Geography. J Geogr 18(5):179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goode JP (1920) The Scope and Outlook of Visual Education. School Sci Math 20(6):482–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goode JP (1923) Goode’s School Atlas. Rand McNally and Co., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Goode JP (1932) Goode’s School Atlas. Revised and Enlarged. Rand McNally and Co., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorman D (2012) Emergence of International Society in the 1920s. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartshorne R (1933) Geographic and Political Boundaries in Upper Silesia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 23(4):195–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartshorne R (1934) The Upper Silesian Industrial District. Geogr Rev 24(3):423–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hinks AR (1919) Boundary Delimitations in the Treaty of Versailles. Geogr J 54(2):103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joerg WLG (1914) The Subdivision of North America into Natural Regions. A Preliminary Inquiry. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 4:55–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joerg WLG (1923) Post-War Atlases. A review. Geogr Rev 13(4):583–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lukowski J, Zawadzki H (2001) A Concise History of Poland. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Manela E (2007) The Wilsonian Moment. Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin Col. L (1924) A Selection of Material on the New Geography. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin GM (1980) The Life and Thought of Isaiah Bowman. Archon, Hamden CTGoogle Scholar
  23. Palsky G (2002) Emmanuel de Martonne and the ethnographical cartography of Central Europe, 1917–1920. Imago Mundi 54(1):111–119.Google Scholar
  24. Pirenne H (1936 [1933]) Economic and Social History of Medieval Europe. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Richardson J (2000) Pál Teleki. A Hungarian Cartographer in Paris. Mapline 91:1–4Google Scholar
  26. Tooley TH (1997) National Identity and Weimar Germany. Upper Silesia and the Eastern Border, 1918–1922. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  27. Toynbee AJ (1934) A Study of History. Vol.1. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Tworek H (2010) Peace through Truth? The Press and Moral Disarmament through the League of Nations. Medien und Zeit 25(4):16–28Google Scholar
  29. Warland G (2014) Henri Pirenne. In: Daniel U, Gatrell P, Janz O, Jones H, Keene J, Kramer A, Nasson B (eds) 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin http://dx.doi.org/10.15463/ie1418.10090 Issued 10 Aug 2014

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hermon Dunlap Smith Center for the History of CartographyThe Newberry LibraryChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations