Influence of the Interest Operators in the Detection of Spontaneous Reactions to the Sound
Hearing plays a key role in our social participation and daily activities. In health, hearing loss in one of the most common conditions, so its diagnosis and monitoring is highly important. The standard test for the evaluation of hearing is the pure tone audiometry, which is a behavioral test that requires a proper interaction and communication between the patient and the audiologist. This need of understanding is which makes this test unworkable when dealing with patients with severe cognitive decline or other communication disorders. In these particular cases, the audiologist base the evaluation in the detection of spontaneous facial reaction that may indicate auditory perception. With the aim of supporting the audiologist, a screening method that analyzes video sequences and seeks for eye gestural reactions was proposed. In this paper, a comprehensive survey about one of the crucial steps of the methodology is presented. This survey determines the optimal configuration for all of them, and evaluates in detail their combination with different classification techniques. The obtained results provide a global vision of the suitability of the different interest operators.
KeywordsHearing assesment Gesture information Eye movement analysis
This research has been partially funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of the Spanish Government through the research projects TIN2011-25476.
- 2.IMSERSO: Las personas mayores en España. In: Instituto de Mayores y Servicios Sociales (2008)Google Scholar
- 4.Davis, A.: Prevalence of hearing impairment. In: Davis, A. (ed.) Hearing in Adults, Chapter 3, pp. 45–46. Whurr Ltd., London (1995)Google Scholar
- 6.Happy, S., George, A., Routray, A.: A real time facial expression classification system using local binary patterns. In: 2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI), pp. 1–5 (2012)Google Scholar
- 9.Viola, P., Jones, M.: Robust real-time object detection. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 4, 85–107 (2001)Google Scholar
- 10.Lucas, B.D., Kanade, T.: An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1981 - vol. 2, pp. 674–679. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA (1981)Google Scholar
- 11.Bouguet, J.Y.: Pyramidal implementation of the Lucas-Kanade feature tracker: description of the algorithm. Intel Corporation, Microprocessor Research Labs (2000)Google Scholar
- 12.Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proceedings of the 4th Alvey Vision Conference, pp. 147–151 (1988)Google Scholar
- 13.Shi, J., Tomasi, C.: Good features to track. In: 1994 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1994, Proceedings CVPR 1994, pp. 593–600 (1994)Google Scholar
- 16.Rosten, E., Drummond, T.: Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking. In: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2005, ICCV 2005, vol. 2, pp. 1508–1515 (2005)Google Scholar