Advertisement

Poroelasticity pp 397-473 | Cite as

Fundamental Solution and Integral Equation

  • Alexander H.-D. Cheng
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media book series (TATP, volume 27)

Abstract

In the mathematical terminology, a fundamental solution is a singular solution of a linear partial differential equation that is not required to satisfy boundary conditions. A Green’s function, on the other hand, is the singular solution tied to a certain domain geometry and boundary condition. For this reason, a fundamental solution is also called a free space Green’s function. Using the symbolism of a generalized function, known as the Dirac delta function, δ, a fundamental solution is a solution of linear partial differential equation with the Dirac delta as its right hand side. From physical considerations, Dirac delta can be used to approximate a forcing applied to a small region. For example, a fluid mass injected through an injection well, whose radius is small compared to the formation that it is flooding, can be considered as a point source. Similarly, a force acting on a small area can be considered as a point force, and a defect in crystal structure (dislocation) or a local slippage of a geological fault can be approximated as a displacement discontinuity, etc. Hence fundamental solution is not just an abstract mathematical construct; it has its root in physics and can be used to model physical phenomena. The use of fundamental solution to simulate a physical phenomenon and to solve mathematical problems can be traced to George Green (An essay on the application of mathematical analysis to the theories of electricity and magnetism, printed for the author, by T. Wheelhouse, Nottingham, 1828) (see Sect. F.7 for a biography). Green utilized the fundamental solution 1∕r of the Laplace equation to model the electrical and magnetic potential created by concentrated electrostatic and magnetic charges. The potential is a mathematical construct, whose derivative gives the force associated with the field. The use of fundamental solution to solve mathematical problems is closely tied to the integral equations known as Green’s identities. Particularly, the third identify, shown in its original form in the prologue of the chapter, provides the general solution to the boundary value problem known as the Dirichlet problem. In this chapter, we extend the classical work on fundamental solutions and integral equations for potential (satisfying Laplace equation) and elasticity problems to poroelasticity. We shall demonstrate that the several varieties of integral equations derived from different origins and the many different fundamental solutions are intricately related. The presentation begins with the integral equations for general anisotropic poroelastic materials. The fundamental solutions are then derived, but only for the case of isotropy. The presentation follows the work of Cheng and Detournay (Int J Solids Struct 35(34–35):4521–4555, 1998).

References

  1. 1.
    Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1965) Handbook of mathematical functions: with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Dover, New York, 1046ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becache E, Nedelec JC, Nishimura N (1993) Regularization in 3-D for anisotropic elastodynamic crack and obstacle problems. J Elast 31:25–46MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Betti E (1872) Teoria della elasticità (Theory of elasticity). Nuovo Cimento 2:6–10Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Betti E (1874) Sopra l’equazioni di equilibrio dei corpi solidi elastici (On the equations of equilibrium of elastic solids). Annali delle Università Toscane 10:143–158Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bilby BA, Eshelby JD (1968) Dislocations and the theory of fracture. In: Liebowitz H (ed) Fracture, an advanced treatise, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 99–182Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biot MA (1956) General solutions of the equations of elasticity and consolidation for a porous material. J Appl Mech ASME 78:91–96MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Booker JR, Carter JP (1986) Long term subsidence due to fluid extraction from a saturated, anisotropic, elastic soil mass. Q J Mech Appl Math 39:85–97CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brebbia CA, Butterfield R (1978) Formal equivalence of direct and indirect boundary element methods. Appl Math Model 2(2):132–134CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 510ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cauchy A-L (1827) Mémoire sur les intégrales définies (Memoir on definite integrals). Mémoires des divers savants 2(1):601–799Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng AHD (2000) Multilayered aquifer systems—fundamentals and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, 384ppGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng AHD, Antes H, Ortner N (1994) Fundamental solutions of products of Helmholtz and polyharmonic operator. Eng Anal Bound Elem 14(2):187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng AH-D, Badmus T, Detournay E (1988) Singular integral equation method for cracks embedded in poroelastic space. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Boundary elements X, vol 3 Stress analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 265–278Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheng AHD, Cheng DT (2005) Heritage and early history of the boundary element method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 29(3):268–302CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheng AHD, Detournay E (1988) A direct boundary element method for plane-strain poroelasticity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 12(5):551–572CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng AHD, Detournay E (1998) On singular integral equations and fundamental solutions of poroelasticity. Int J Solids Struct 35(34–35):4521–4555MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng AHD, Liggett JA (1984) Boundary integral equation method for linear porous-elasticity with applications to soil consolidation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 20(2):255–278CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheng AHD, Liggett JA (1984) Boundary integral equation method for linear porous-elasticity with applications to fracture propagation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 20(2):279–296CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheng AHD, Predeleanu M (1987) Transient boundary element formulation for linear poroelasticity. Appl Math Model 11(4):285–290MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cleary MP (1977) Fundamental solutions for a fluid-saturated porous solid. Int J Solids Struct 13(9):785–806MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crank J (1980) The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 424ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crouch SL, Starfield AM (1983) Boundary element methods in solid mechanics. Allen and Unwin, London/Boston, 322ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Detournay E, Cheng AHD (1987) Poroelastic solution of a plane-strain point displacement discontinuity. J Appl Mech ASME 54(4):783–787CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Detournay E, Cheng AHD (1991) Plane strain analysis of a stationary hydraulic fracture in a poroelastic medium. Int J Solids Struct 27(13):1645–1662CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dougall J (1897) A general method of solving the equations of elasticity. Proc Edinb Math Soc 16(1):82–98CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dundurs J (1969) Elastic interaction of dislocations with inhomogeneities. In: Mura T (ed) Mathematical theory of dislocation. ASME, New York, pp 70–115Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fredholm I (1903) Sur une classe d’équations fonctionelles (On a class of functional equations). Acta Math 27(1):365–390MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Geertsma J (1973) Land subsidence above compacting oil and gas reservoirs. J Pet Technol 25(6):734–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ghassemi A, Cheng AHD, Diek A, Roegiers JC (2001) A complete plane strain fictitious stress boundary element method for poroelastic media. Eng Anal Bound Elem 25(1):41–48CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Green G (1828) An essay on the application of mathematical analysis to the theories of electricity and magnetism, printed for the author, by T. Wheelhouse, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Green G (1871) Mathematical papers of George Green. N.M. Ferrers, reprinted by Chelsea Publ. Co., New York, 1970Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Greenberg MD (1971) Application of green’s function in science and engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 141ppGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gudmundsson A (1998) Magma chambers modeled as cavities explain the formation of rift zone central volcanoes and their eruption and intrusion statistics. J Geophys Res–Solid Earth 103(B4):7401–7412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gudmundsson A (1998) Formation and development of normal-fault calderas and the initiation of large explosive eruptions. Bull Volcanol 60(3):160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hadamard J (1908) Theorie des équations aux dérivées partielles linéaires hyperboliques et du probléme de Cauchy (Theories of equations with partial linear hyperbolic derivatives and the problem of Cauchy). Acta Math 31(4):333–380MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hong HK, Chen JT (1988) Derivations of integral equations of elasticity. J Eng Mech ASCE 114(6):1028–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Huynen A, Detournay E (2014) A remark on the poroelastic center of dilation. J Elast 116(2):189–206MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jaswon MA, Symm GT (1977) Integral equation methods in potential theory and elastostatics (Computational mathematics and applications). Academic, London/New York, 301ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Krishnasamy G, Rizzo FJ, Rudolphi TJ (1991) Hypersingular boundary integral equations: their occurrence, interpretation, regularization, and computation, Chap. 7. In: Banerjee PK, Kobayashi S (eds) Developments in boundary element methods. Elsevier, London/New York, pp 207–252Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Love AEH (1927) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 643ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maxwell JC (1864) On the calculation of the equilibrium and stiffness of frames. Philos Mag 27:294–299Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mindlin RD (1953) Force at a point in the interior of a semi-infinite solid. In: Proceedings of the first midwestern conference on solid mechanics, Urbana, pp 56–59Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Morse P, Feshbach H (1953) Methods of theoretical physics, part 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, 997ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, 588ppCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nedelec JC (1986) The double layer potential for periodic elastic waves in R 3. In: Du QH (ed) Boundary elements. Pergamon, Oxford/New York, pp 439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pan E, Maier G (1997) A symmetric boundary integral approach to transient poroelastic analysis. Comput Mech 19(3):169–178CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Predeleanu M (1968) O teoremă de reciprocitate în teoria consolidării mediilor poroase (A reciprocal theorem in the consolidation theory of the porous media). Analele Universităṭii Bucureṣti, Seria Ṣtiinṭele Naturii, Matematică-Mecanică, Extras 17(2):69–74MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rayleigh JWS (1877) The theory of sound, vols 1 and 2. Macmillan, London, (Also published by Dover, 2nd edn., 1945)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Renshaw CE, Harvey CF (1994) Propagation velocity of a natural hydraulic fracture in a poroelastic medium. J Geophys Res–Solid Earth 99(B11):21667–21677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Somigliana C (1885) Sopra l’equilibrio di un corpo elastico isotropo (On the equilibrium of an isotropic elastic body). Nuovo Cimento 3:17–20Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Somigliana C (1914/1915) Sulla teoria delle distorsioni elastiche (on the theory of elastic distortions). Note I e II. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei Rendiconti Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali. 23:463–472 and 24:655–666Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sternberg WJ, Smith TL (1944) The theory of potential and spherical harmonics, 2nd edn. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 324ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thomson (Lord Kelvin) W (1848) Note on the integrations of the equations of equilibrium of an elastic solid. Camb Dublin Math J 3:76–99Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vandamme L, Detournay E, Cheng AHD (1989) A two-dimensional poroelastic displacement discontinuity method for hydraulic fracture simulation. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 13(2):215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Volterra V (1896) Sulla inversione degli integrali multipli (On the inversion of multiple integrals). Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei Rendiconti Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali 5:289–300Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Volterra V (1907) Sur l’équilibre des carps élastiques multiplement connexes (On the equilibrium of multiply connected elastic body). Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Superieure, Paris 24:401–517MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Waterman PC (1965) Matrix formulation for electromagnetic scattering. Proc Inst Electr Electron Eng 53(8):805–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Waterman PC (1969) New formulation of acoustic scattering. J Acoust Soc Am 45(6):1417–1429CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander H.-D. Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MississippiOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations