Poroelasticity pp 113-169

# Variational Energy Formulation

• Alexander H.-D. Cheng
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media book series (TATP, volume 27)

## Abstract

In Chap. , the constitutive equations for poroelasticity were constructed using the phenomenological approach. In such approach, we attempt to model a new phenomenon, such as the deformation of a saturated porous body, by drawing an analogy with a familiar phenomenon, such as the deformation of an elastic body. In the analogy, we define stresses and strains for a porous body following the elasticity concept, even though their interpretation may not be clear. (For example, see the illustration in Fig.  for the lack of a clear definition for a continuous stress field in a porous body.) We then bring in the additional force component, namely the pore pressure, and its conjugate deformation, the fluid strain (or actually the relative fluid to solid strain), to build a linear relation that is similar to that of the elasticity theory. This type of ad hoc construction of a working theory is typically motivated first by the observation, and then supported by physical insight, without formally resorting to the laws of physics. To gain additional physical insight, in Chap.  we utilized the micromechanics approach to explicitly model the material phases in a porous medium, not only the solid and the fluid, but also the pore space as an additional “phase”, together with their interactions. These micromechanical constitutive laws were assembled and matched up with the bulk continuum theory to provide physical insight. However, these constitutive laws were largely constructed using the “effective stress” concept; hence their theoretical basis is still phenomenological. The material constants associated with the theory, such as K, K s , and K s , are still empirical constants, as their physical mechanisms are based on composite responses, and are not fully isolated to tie to the equation of the state of the phases. There are many attempts to build porous medium constitutive models that go beyond the phenomenological model. Among the more widely pursued approaches are the theory of mixtures (Atkin and Craine, Q J Mech Appl Math 29:209–244, 1976; Bowen, Int J Eng Sci 18(9):1129–1148, 1980; Bowen, Int J Eng Sci 20(6):697–735, 1982; Crochet and Naghdi, Int J Eng Sci 4:383–401, 1966; de Boer R, Theory of porous media, highlights in the historical development and current state. Springer, Brelin/New York, 2000, 618pp; Morland, J Geophys Res 77(5):890–900, 1972), and the homogenization theory (Auriault and Sanchez-Palencia, J de Méc 16(4):575–603, 1977; Chateau and Dormieux, Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26(8):831–844, 2002; Mei and Auriault, Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 426(1871):391–423, 1989; Terada et al., Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 153(3–4):223–257, 1998). The theory of mixtures uses the mathematical assumption that the solid and fluid phases occupies the same space, whose presence and influence are weighted by a volume fraction, in order to fulfill the requirement of a continuous mathematical function. This approach is largely mathematical, and the “material coefficients” generally do not possess physical meaning until a comparison is made with a theory that is in use, such as a phenomenological theory. The homogenization approach, on the other hand, explicitly recognizes solid and fluid phases occupying different space at the microscopic level, with an assumed periodic pore geometry. The full partial differential equations, such as Navier-Stokes equation for the fluid and elasticity equation for the solid, are prescribed, together with boundary conditions. Effort is then made to simplify these equations based on the perturbation of small parameters, in order to extract mathematical terms, and physical phenomena, of the first order, second order, etc. The homogenization approach typically involves heavy mathematics. Different judgement on the mathematical treatment sometimes leads to different, and even inconsistent results. Its ultimate justification still requires the validation by physical experiments. In this chapter we take a different approach from those above. We shall build the poroelasticity theory based on the thermodynamics principles of work and energy, first based on the reversible processes for the elastic constitutive laws, and then in the later chapters on the irreversible processes for the fluid, heat flux, and chemical diffusion laws. To cope with the highly heterogeneous nature of porous materials, the volume averaging method developed in the flow through porous medium theory (Bear J, Bachmat Y, Introduction to modeling phenomena of transport in porous media. Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston, 1990, 553pp), and the theory of heterogeneous (composite) materials (Christensen RM, Mechanics of composite materials. Wiley Interscience, New York, 1979, 384pp; Nemat-Nasser S, Hori M, Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous materials, 2nd edn. North-Holland, 1999, 810pp), are used to define the continuous and smooth functions needed in the construction of partial differential equations. The porous materials are considered as consisting of a heterogeneous solid phase and a homogeneous fluid phase (Lopatnikov and Cheng, Mech Mater 34(11):685–704, 2002). The macroscopic stresses and strains are defined as microscopically volume or surface averaged quantities depending on whether internal energy or external work is concerned. Constitutive equations are constructed using the variational energy principle stemming from the classical physics law of minimum potential energy (Landau LD, Lifshitz EM, Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. Course of theoretical physics, vol 7. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford/Burlington, 1986, 195pp). The resultant model consists of a set of intrinsic material constants (Cheng and Abousleiman, Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(7):803–831, 2008), which are directly associated with the equations of state of the solid and fluid phase, and the fundamental deformation modes of the pore structure.

## References

1. 1.
Atkin RJ, Craine RE (1976) Continuum theories of mixtures—basic theory and historical development. Q J Mech Appl Math 29:209–244
2. 2.
Auriault JL, Sanchez-Palencia E (1977) Etude du comportement d’un milieu poreux saturé déformable (Study of macroscopic behavior of a deformable saturated porous medium). J de Méc 16(4):575–603
3. 3.
Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. American Elsevier, New York, 764pp (also published by Dover, 1988)Google Scholar
4. 4.
Bear J, Bachmat Y (1990) Introduction to modeling phenomena of transport in porous media. Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston, 553pp
5. 5.
Bear J, Cheng AHD (2010) Modeling groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Springer, Dordrecht/London, 834pp
6. 6.
Berge PA, Wang HF, Bonner BP (1993) Pore pressure buildup coefficient in synthetic and natural sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 30(7):1135–1141
7. 7.
Berryman JG (2006) Effective medium theories for multicomponent poroelastic composites. J Eng Mech ASCE 132(5):519–531
8. 8.
Berryman JG, Pride SR (1998) Volume averaging, effective stress rules, and inversion for microstructural response of multicomponent porous media. Int J Solids Struct 35(34–35):4811–4843
9. 9.
Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12(2):155–164
10. 10.
Biot MA (1955) Variational principles in irreversible thermodynamics with application to viscoelasticity. Phys Rev 97(6):1463–1469
11. 11.
Biot MA (1956) Thermoelasticity and irreversible thermodynamics. J Appl Phys 27(3):240–253
12. 12.
Biot MA (1956) Variational and Lagrangian methods in viscoelasticity. In: Grammel R (ed) Deformation and flow of solids, IUTAM colloquium Madrid 1955. Springer, Berlin, pp 251–263Google Scholar
13. 13.
Biot MA (1962) Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media. J Acoust Soc Am 34(9):1254–1264
14. 14.
Biot MA (1973) Nonlinear and semilinear rheology of porous solids. J Geophys Res 78(23):4924–4937
15. 15.
Biot MA, Willis DG (1957) The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation. J Appl Mech ASME 24:594–601
16. 16.
Boresi AP, Chong KP, Lee JD (2010) Elasticity in engineering mechanics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, 656pp
17. 17.
Borja RI (2006) On the mechanical energy and effective stress in saturated and unsaturated porous continua. Int J Solids Struct 43(6):1764–1786
18. 18.
Bowen RM (1980) Incompressible porous media models by use of the theory of mixtures. Int J Eng Sci 18(9):1129–1148
19. 19.
Bowen RM (1982) Compressible porous media models by use of the theory of mixtures. Int J Eng Sci 20(6):697–735
20. 20.
Brown RJS, Korringa J (1975) Dependence of elastic properties of a porous rock on compressibility of pore fluid. Geophysics 40(4):608–616
21. 21.
Budiansky B, O’Connell RJ (1976) Elastic moduli of a cracked solid. Int J Solids Struct 12(2):81–97
22. 22.
Chateau X, Dormieux L (2002) Micromechanics of saturated and unsaturated porous media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26(8):831–844
23. 23.
Cheng AHD, Abousleiman Y (2008) Intrinsic poroelasticity constants and a semilinear model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(7):803–831
24. 24.
Cheng AHD, Lopatnikov SL (2002) Variational formulation of fluid infiltrated porous materials and physically-based micromechanical material constants. In: Auriault JL, Geindreau C, Royer P, Bloch JF, Boutin C, Lewandowska J (eds) Poromechanics II, proceedings of the second biot conference on poromechanics. Balkema, Grenoble, pp 385–390Google Scholar
25. 25.
Christensen RM (1979) Mechanics of composite materials. Wiley Interscience, New York, 384ppGoogle Scholar
26. 26.
Cleary MP (1978) Elastic and dynamic response regimes of fluid-impregnated solids with diverse microstructures. Int J Solids Struct 14(10):795–819
27. 27.
Coussy O (1995) Mechanics of porous continua, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester/New York, 472pp
28. 28.
Coussy O (2004) Poromechanics. Wiley, Chichester, 298pp
29. 29.
Coussy O (2005) Poromechanics of freezing materials. J Mech Phys Solids 53(8):1689–1718
30. 30.
Coussy O (2006) Deformation and stress from in-pore drying-induced crystallization of salt. J Mech Phys Solids 54(8):1517–1547
31. 31.
Coussy O (2007) Revisiting the constitutive equations of unsaturated porous solids using a Lagrangian saturation concept. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31(15):1675–1694
32. 32.
Coussy O, Eymard R, Lassabatere T (1998) Constitutive modeling of unsaturated drying deformable materials. J Eng Mech ASCE 124(6):658–667
33. 33.
Crochet MJ, Naghdi PM (1966) On constitutive equations for flow of fluid through an elastic solid. Int J Eng Sci 4:383–401
34. 34.
Cruz-Orive LM, Myking AO (1981) Stereological estimation of volume ratios by systematic sections. J Microsc 122:143–157
35. 35.
de Boer R (1998) The thermodynamic structure and constitutive equations for fluid-saturated compressible and incompressible elastic porous solids. Int J Solids Struct 35(34–35):4557–4573
36. 36.
de Boer R (2000) Theory of porous media, highlights in the historical development and current state. Springer, Brelin/New York, 618pp
37. 37.
de Groot SR, Mazur P (1984) Non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Dover, New York, 526pp
38. 38.
Delesse A (1848) Procédé mécanique pour déterminer la composition des roches (Mechanical process to determine the composition of rocks). Ann des Mines Paris (Ser 4) 13:379–388Google Scholar
39. 39.
Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 241(1226):376–396
40. 40.
Gray WG, Schrefler BA (2007) Analysis of the solid phase stress tensor in multiphase porous media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31(4):541–581
41. 41.
Green DH, Wang HF (1986) Fluid pressure response to undrained compression in saturated sedimentary rock. Geophysics 51(4):948–956
42. 42.
Hart DJ, Wang HF (1995) Laboratory measurements of a complete set of poroelastic moduli for Berea sandstone and Indiana limestone. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 100(B9):17741–17751
43. 43.
Hart DJ, Wang HF (2010) Variation of unjacketed pore compressibility using Gassmann’s equation and an overdetermined set of volumetric poroelastic measurements. Geophysics 75(1):N9–N18
44. 44.
Hashin Z (1964) Theory of mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous media. Appl Mech Rev 17:1–9Google Scholar
45. 45.
Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11(2):127–140
46. 46.
Hill R (1963) Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids 11(5):357–372
47. 47.
Hill R (1967) The essential structure of constitutive laws for metal composites and polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids 15(2):79–95
48. 48.
Kachanov M (1987) Elastic solids with many cracks—a simple method of analysis. Int J Solids Struct 23(1):23–43
49. 49.
Kachanov M, Sevostianov I (2005) On quantitative characterization of microstructures and effective properties. Int J Solids Struct 42(2):309–336
50. 50.
Katchalsky A, Curran PF (1967) Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in biophysics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 248ppGoogle Scholar
51. 51.
Kim YK, Kingsbury HB (1979) Dynamic characterization of poroelastic materials. Exp Mech 19(7):252–258
52. 52.
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1986) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. Course of theoretical physics, vol 7. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford/Burlington, 195ppGoogle Scholar
53. 53.
Laurent J, Boutéca MJ, Sarda JP, Bary D (1993) Pore-pressure influence in the poroelastic behavior of rocks—experimental studies and results. SPE Form Eval 8(2):117–122
54. 54.
Lopatnikov SL, Cheng AHD (2002) Variational formulation of fluid infiltrated porous material in thermal and mechanical equilibrium. Mech Mater 34(11):685–704
55. 55.
Mackenzie JK (1950) The elastic constants of a solid containing spherical holes. Proc Phys Soc Lond Sect B 63(361):2–11
56. 56.
Mei CC, Auriault JL (1989) Mechanics of heterogeneous porous media with several spatial scales. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 426(1871):391–423
57. 57.
Morland LW (1972) A simple constitutive theory for a fluid-saturate porous solid. J Geophys Res 77(5):890–900
58. 58.
Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, 588pp
59. 59.
Nemat-Nasser S, Hori M (1999) Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous materials, 2nd edn. North-Holland, Amsterdam/London, 810pp
60. 60.
Nowacki W (1986) Thermoelasticity, 2nd edn. Pergamon, Oxford/New York, 566pp
61. 61.
Nur A, Byerlee JD (1971) Exact effective stress law for elastic deformation of rock with fluids. J Geophys Res 76(26):6414–6419
62. 62.
Sokolnikoff IS (1956) Mathematical theory of elasticity, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, 476pp
63. 63.
Terada K, Ito T, Kikuchi N (1998) Characterization of the mechanical behaviors of solid-fluid mixture by the homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 153(3–4):223–257
64. 64.
Thomas SD (1989) A finite element model for the analysis of wave induced stresses, displacements and pore pressures in an unsaturated seabed I: theory. Comput Geotech 8(1):1–38
65. 65.
Thomson (Lord Kelvin) W (1852) On the universal tendency in nature to the dissipation of mechanical energy. Philos Mag Ser 4 4(25):304–306Google Scholar
66. 66.
Vajdova V, Baud P, Wong TF (2004) Compaction, dilatancy, and failure in porous carbonate rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 109(B5):16
67. 67.
van der Knaap W (1959) Nonlinear behavior of elastic porous media. Trans Am Inst Mining Metall Eng 216:179–186Google Scholar
68. 68.
Verruijt A (1969) Elastic storage of aquifers. In: DeWiest RJM (ed) Flow through porous media. Academic, New York, pp 331–376Google Scholar
69. 69.
Wei C, Muraleetharan KK (2002) A continuum theory of porous media saturated by multiple immiscible fluids: I. Linear poroelasticity. Int J Eng Sci 40(16):1807–1833
70. 70.
Wei C, Muraleetharan KK (2002) A continuum theory of porous media saturated by multiple immiscible fluids: II. Lagrangian description and variational structure. Int J Eng Sci 40(16):1835–1854
71. 71.
Wong TF, Baud P (1999) Mechanical compaction of porous sandstone. Oil Gas Sci Technol Revue de l’Inst Fr du Pet 54(6):715–727
72. 72.
Wong TF, David C, Zhu WL (1997) The transition from brittle faulting to cataclastic flow in porous sandstones: mechanical deformation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102(B2):3009–3025
73. 73.
Wood AB (1941) Textbook of sound. Being an account of the physics of vibrations with special reference to recent theoretical and technical developments, 2nd edn. Bell & Sons, London, 578ppGoogle Scholar
74. 74.
Wu XY, Baud P, Wong TF (2000) Micromechanics of compressive failure and spatial evolution of anisotropic damage in Darley Dale sandstone. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 37(1–2):143–160
75. 75.
Zhang JX, Wong TF, Davis DM (1990) Micromechanics of pressure-induced grain crushing in porous rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth Planets 95(B1):341–352
76. 76.
Zimmerman RW, Somerton WH, King MS (1986) Compressibility of porous rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth Planets 91(B12):2765–2777