Poroelasticity pp 61-82 | Cite as

# Constitutive Equation

## Abstract

*constitutive equation*is a mathematical relation between two or more physical quantities. To define such mathematical relations, coefficients that are specific to a material, or to a composite material, known as

*material constants*, are needed.As quoted above, Robert Hooke (see Sect. F.2 for a biography) was the first to establish a constitutive relation for elastic bodies by observing that the elongation of a coil spring, a spiral spring, a wire string, and also the bending of a straight piece of wood, are directly proportional to the weight attached to them (Hooke R, De Potentia Restitutivâ, or of spring, explaining the power of springy bodies. Martyn, London, 1678, 56pp). When this observation is used to establish linear relations between the

*stress*and

*strain*of an elastic body, it is called

*Hooke’s law*, to honor the original contribution by Hooke.Since Hooke’s observation, it took almost 130 years, until 1807, that a material constant was explicitly defined by Thomas Young (Young T, A course of lectures on natural philosophy and the mechanical arts, vol 2. Joseph Johnson, London, 1807, 738pp) (see Sect. F.4 for a biography), and he stated:

The modulus of the elasticity of any substance is a column of the same substance, capable of producing a pressure on its base which is to the weight causing a certain degree of compression, as the length of the substance is to the diminution of its length.

In the above, Young first defined a *weight of modulus of elasticity*, which was dependent on the cross-sectional area of the column. When the weight of modulus is divided by the cross-sectional area to yield a *height of modulus*, then it becomes a material property only, which in present-day terminology is called the *Young’s modulus*. In fact, it was quite amazing that Young was able to determine the Young’s modulus of a steel to be 2. 9 × 10^{7} psi, which is the same as the present-day determined value, by finding the frequency of vibration of a tuning fork (Timoshenko SP, History of strength of materials. Dover, New York, 1983, 452pp; Young T, A course of lectures on natural philosophy and the mechanical arts, vol 2. Joseph Johnson, London, 1807, 738pp)!Other examples of constitutive equations include Newton’s law of viscosity, relating the rate of fluid shear strain to applied shear stress, through a material constant called *viscosity*, and Darcy’s law of porous medium, relating the fluid specific flux to the applied head gradient, through a constant called *hydraulic conductivity*, which is a combined property of the porous medium void space geometry and the fluid residing in it.These constitutive equations (laws) are often combined with other physical laws of more general nature, such as mass, momentum, and energy conservation, which are not specific to a material, to form a set of *governing equations* to predict the physical response of matters subject to disturbances (see Chap. 6).In this chapter, we shall construct the constitutive equations for poroelasticity. Particularly, we are interested in the deformation of the porous solid and the fluid, subjected to applied forces and pressure.

## Keywords

Constitutive Equation Pore Pressure Bulk Modulus Representative Elementary Volume Storage Coefficient## References

- 1.Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. American Elsevier, New York, 764pp (also published by Dover, 1988)Google Scholar
- 2.Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12(2):155–164CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.Biot MA (1956) General solutions of the equations of elasticity and consolidation for a porous material. J Appl Mech ASME 78:91–96MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.Biot MA, Willis DG (1957) The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation. J Appl Mech ASME 24:594–601MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Boresi AP, Chong KP, Lee JD (2010) Elasticity in engineering mechanics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, 656ppCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cartwright N (1983) How the laws of physics lie. Oxford University Press, New York, 232ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cauchy A-L (1828) Sur les équations qui expriment les conditions d’équilibre ou les lois du mouvement intérieur d’un corps solide, élastique, ou non émystiques (On equations that express the equilibrium conditions or the laws of motion within a solid, elastic, or inelastic). Exerc de Math 3:160–187Google Scholar
- 8.Cheng AHD (2000) Multilayered aquifer systems—fundamentals and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York/Basel, 384ppGoogle Scholar
- 9.Fung YC (1977) A first course in continuum mechanics, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 351ppGoogle Scholar
- 10.Green DH, Wang HF (1990) Specific storage as a poroelastic coefficient. Water Resour Res 26(7):1631–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Hantush MS (1960) Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers. J Geophys Res 65(11):3713–3725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hantush MS (1964) Hydraulics of wells. In: Chow VT (ed) Advances in hydroscience, vol 1. Academic, New York/London, pp 281–432Google Scholar
- 13.Hooke R (1678) De Potentia Restitutivâ, or of spring, explaining the power of springy bodies. Martyn, London, 56ppGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lamé G (1852) Leçons sur la théorie mathématique de l’élasticité des corps solides (Lectures on the mathematical theory of elasticity of solid bodies). Bachelier, Paris, 335ppGoogle Scholar
- 15.Love AEH (1892) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 354ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 16.Navier C-L (1821) Memoire sur les lois de l’équilibre et du mouvement des corps solides élastiques (Memorandum on the laws of equilibrium and motion of elastic solids). Mem Acad Sci Inst Fr 2:375–393Google Scholar
- 17.Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA, Skiff WM (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114(25):10024–10035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Rice JR, Cleary MP (1976) Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents. Rev Geophys 14(2):227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Saada AS (1993) Elasticity, theory and applications, 2nd edn. Kreiger, Malabar, 775ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 20.Skempton AW (1954) The pore pressure coefficients A and B. Géotechnique 4(4):143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Sokolnikoff IS (1956) Mathematical theory of elasticity, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, 476ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 22.Terzaghi K (1923) Die Berechnung der Durchlässigkeitsziffer des Tones aus dem Verlauf der hydrodynamischen Spannungserscheinungen (A method of calculating the permeability of clay from the history of hydrodynamic stress variation). Sitzungsber. d Akad d Wiss Wien Math-Naturwiss Kl Abt IIa 132(3/4):125–138Google Scholar
- 23.Terzaghi K (1936) The shearing resistance of saturated soils and the angle between the planes of shear. In: First international conference on soil mechanics, vol 1. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, pp 54–56Google Scholar
- 24.Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York, 528ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Thewlis J (ed)(1979) Concise dictionary of physics, 2nd edn. Pergamon, Oxford/New York, 370ppGoogle Scholar
- 26.Timoshenko SP (1983) History of strength of materials. Dover, New York, 452ppGoogle Scholar
- 27.Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, 567ppzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 28.Verruijt A (1969) Elastic storage of aquifers. In: DeWiest RJM (ed) Flow through porous media. Academic, New York, pp 331–376Google Scholar
- 29.Young T (1807) A course of lectures on natural philosophy and the mechanical arts, vol 2. Joseph Johnson, London, 738ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar