Abstract
Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) has been advanced as a response to growing problems of water scarcity in the developing world. While the precept of the IWRM process is unexceptionable, its practice has meant a package of interventions. The trouble with the ‘IWRM package’, and indeed the global water governance debate as a whole, is its intent to transform, all at once, a predominantly informal water economy into a predominantly formal one—something that would normally be the result of a long process of economic growth and the transformation that comes in its wake. In the IWRM discourse, formalizing informal water economies is improving water governance. But evidence across the world suggests that there is no shortcut for a poor society to morph its informal water economy into a formal one; the process by which this happens is organically tied to wider processes of economic growth. When countries try to force the pace of formalization, as they will no doubt do, interventions come unstuck. Interventions are more likely to work if they aim to improve the working of a water economy while it is informal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The approach and methodology used by these researchers were similar to those used for computing the Human Development Index (HDI) (see, UNDP 2000). The index was constructed by combining five component indices that cover water resource endowments, access to water, human capacity, water use efficiency, and quality of water environment. Each of the five component indices was given equal weight to generate the Water Poverty Index that takes values in the range of 0 and 100, the higher the value, lower the water poverty.
- 2.
Which presumably means water supply through a local community-based or municipal body that takes some responsibility of quality.
- 3.
Scott Roselle used this phrase recently to refer to the unexceptionable tendency of agricultural population ratios of countries to fall as their economies grow. But I think this also applies to other responses to economic development as outlined in Fig. 2.1.
- 4.
If accounts of the travails facing global water companies like Vivendi and Thames Water who are forced to wind up even in these increasingly affluent east- Asian cities is any guide, we must conclude that South Asian cities have a long way to go before they can afford water supply systems of European or North American quality (see, The Economist, August 15–21, 2004).
References
Bandaragoda, D. J., & Firdousi, G. R. (1992). Institutional factors affecting irrigation performance in Pakistan: Research and policy priorities (IIMI country paper, Pakistan, No. 4). Colombo: International Irrigation Management Institute.
Bhattarai, M., & Hammig, M. (2001). Institutions and the environmental Kuznet’s curve for deforestation: A cross-country analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Development, 29(6), 995–1010.
Biswas, A. K. (2004). Integrated water resources management: A reassessment. Water International, 29(2), 248–256.
Cosgrove, W. J. (2003). Water resource sector in the coming decades: Global perspective. In K. Prasad (Ed.), Water resources and sustainable development: Challenges of 21st century (pp. 4–16). New Delhi: Shipra Publications.
Cosgrove, W. J., & Rijsberman, F. R. (2000). World water vision: Making water everybody’s business. London: Earth-scan Publications.
Cullis, J., & van Koppen, B. (2005). Applying the Gini-Coefficient to measure inequality in water use in Olifants River water management area (Draft paper). Pretoria: Ninham Shand and International Water Management Institute.
Fiege, E. L. (1990). Defining and estimating underground and informal economies, the new institutional economics approach. World Development, 18(7), 989–1002.
Frederiksen, H. D., & Vissia, R. J. (1998). Considerations in formulating the transfer of services in the water sector. Colombo: International Water Management Institute.
Gleick, P. H. (2002, July 25). Soft water paths. Nature, 418. www.nature.com/nature
Global Water Partnership. (2000). Integrated water resources management (TAC background papers, No. 4, 67 pp). www.gwpforum.org/gwp/library/Tacno4.pdf. Accessed 22 Jul 2006.
Government of India. (2012). National water policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Water Resources. http://mowr.gov.in/writereaddata/linkimages/DraftNWP2012_English9353289094.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2013.
Holmes, P. R. (2000). Effective organizations for water management. Water Resources Development, 16(1), 57–71.
Lawrence, P., Meigh, J., & Sullivan, C. (2003). The water poverty index: International comparisons (Keele economic research papers, 2003/18). Wallingford: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH).
Londhe, A., Talati, J., Singh, L. K., Vilayasseril, M., Dhaunta, S., Rawlley, B., Ganapathy, K. K., & Mathew, R. P. (2004). Urban-Hinterland water transactions: A scoping study of six class I Indian cities (IWMI Tata Water Policy Program working paper). Anand: IWMI.
Luis-Manso, P. (2005). Water institutions and management in Switzerland (MIR Report-2005-001). College of Management of Technology. http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/53568/files/CDM%20WP%20-%20Water%20Switzerland. Accessed 15 Oct 2005.
Merrey, D. J. (1996). Institutional design principles for accountability in large irrigation systems (IIMI research report, 8). Colombo: IIMI.
Molle, F. (2005). Irrigation and water policies in the mekong region: Current discourses and practice. Paper presented at 4th IWMI-Tata Partners Meet, International Water Management Institute, Anand, 24–26 Feb 2005.
Mukherji, A. (2005). The spread and extent of irrigation rental market in India, 1976–77 to 1997–98: What does the national sample survey data Reveal? Paper presented at 4th IWMI-Tata Partners Meet, International Water Management Institute, Anand, 24–26 Feb 2005.
National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO). (1999a). Drinking water, sanitation and hygiene in India (National Sample Survey Organization, Report No. 449, 54th round, Jan–June 1998). New Delhi: Government of India.
National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO). (1999b). Common property resources in India (National Sample Survey Organization, Report No. 452 (54/31/4) 54th round, Jan–June 1998). New Delhi: Government of India.
National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO). (2003). Report on village facilities (National Sample Survey Organization, Report No. 487(58/3.1/1) 58th round, July–Dec 2002). New Delhi: Government of India.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ohlsson, L., & Turton, A. R. (1999). The turning of a screw: Social resource scarcity as a bottle-neck in adaptation to water scarcity (Occasional paper). London: SOAS Water Study Group.
Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective water governance (TEC background paper, 7). Stockholm: Global Water Partnership.
Rosegrant, M., Kai, X., & Cline, S. (2002). World water and food to 2025. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Saleth, R. M. (2004). Strategic analysis of water institutions in India: Application of a new research paradigm (IWMI research report, 79). Colombo: IWMI.
Saleth, R. M., & Dinar, A. (2004). The institutional economics of water: A cross-country analysis of institutions and performance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 398 pp.
Samad, M. (2005). The politics of water policy reforms in Sri Lanka. Paper presented at 4th IWMI-Tata Partners Meet, International Water Management Institute, Anand, 24–26 Febr 2005.
Seckler, D., Barker, R., & Amarasinghe, A. (1999). Water scarcity in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 15(1/2), 29–42.
Shah, T. (2009). Taming the anarchy: Groundwater governance in South Asia. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
Shah, T., & van Koppen, B. (2005). Fitting water reforms to national context: A brief report on African Law Workshop. Draft paper presented at Fourth Annual IWMI-TATA Partners Meet, 24–26 February, 2005, Anand, Gujarat002E
Shah, T., & Verma, S. (2008). Co-management of electricity and groundwater: An assessment of Gujarat’s Jyotirgram scheme. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(7), 59–66.
Shah, T., Bhatt, S., Shah, R. K., & Talati, J. (2008). Groundwater governance through electricity supply management: Assessing an innovative intervention in Gujarat, western India. Agricultural Water Management, 95(11), 1233–1242.
Sullivan, C., & Meigh, J. (2003). Considering the water poverty index in the context of poverty alleviation. Water Pollution, 5(5–6), 513–528.
Talati, J., & Shah, T. (2004). Institutional vacuum in sardar sarovar project: Framing ‘rules-of-the-game’. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(31), 3504–3509.
The Economist. (2004, 15–21 August). Life is not easy for the three biggest private-sector water firms.
The World Bank. (2005). Water resources, growth and development. Washington: The World Bank, unpublished working paper for discussion (by David Grey and Claudia Sadoff).
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2000). Human development report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press for UNDP. 290 pp.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2003). Millennium development goals: A compact among nations to end human poverty. New York: Oxford University Press for UNDP.
Wolfe, S., & Brooks, D. B. (2003). Water scarcity: An alternative view and its implications for policy and capacity building. Natural Resources Forum, 27(2), 99–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shah, T., van Koppen, B. (2016). The Precept and Practice of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in India. In: Narain, V., Narayanamoorthy, A. (eds) Indian Water Policy at the Crossroads: Resources, Technology and Reforms. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25184-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25184-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25182-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25184-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)