Skip to main content

Preserving Multi-view Consistency in Diagrammatic Knowledge Representation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9403))

Abstract

Multi-view conceptual modeling provides means for representing, with diagrammatic means, the knowledge describing a “system under study” whose complexity cannot be captured in a single comprehensible representation. Typical examples are available in the field of enterprise modeling, where models are inherently layered or partitioned, a feature that must be enabled at meta-modeling level by means of abstraction and decomposition. Multi-view modeling must provide means for coping with the complexity of enterprise knowledge representations through consistency preservation techniques across multiple, interrelated views. The paper at hand formulates the conceptual functions fulfilled by multi-view modeling and provides a demonstrative implementation in the context of the Semantic Object Model enterprise modeling method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nakamori, Y.: A perspective of knowledge science. In: Xiong, H., Lee, W.B. (eds.) KSEM 2011. LNCS, vol. 7091, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Kheir, A., Naja, H., Oussalah, M.C., Tout, K.: Overview of an approach describing multi-views/multi-abstraction levels software architecture. In: Maciaszek, L., Filipe, J. (eds.) Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, pp. 140–148 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karagiannis, D., Kühn, H.: Metamodelling platforms. In: Bauknecht, K., Tjoa, A.M., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) EC-Web 2002. LNCS, vol. 2455, p. 182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferstl O.K., Sinz E.J.: Modeling of business systems using SOM. In: Bernus P., Mertins K., Schmidt G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 347–367. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karagiannis, D., Grossmann, W., Hoefferer, P.: Open Model Initiative: A Feasilbility Study. http://files.omilab.org/Open_Models_Feasibility_Study_SEPT_2008.pdf

  6. Bork, D., Sinz, E.J.: Design of a SOM business process modelling tool based on the ADOxx meta-modelling platform. In: de Lara, J., Varro, D. (eds.) Pre-Proceedings 4th International Workshop on Graph-Based Tools, NL-Enschede, pp. 89–101 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. SPARC Relational Database Task Group: Final Report of the ANSI/X3/SPARC DBS-SG Relational Database Task Group. SIGMOD Rec. 12(4), 1–62 (1982). Ed. by Brodie, M.L., Schmidt, J.W.: ACM, New York

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kruchten, P.: Architectural Blueprints - The “4 + 1” View Model of Software Architecture. IEEE Software 12(6), 42–50 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldschmidt, T., Becker, S., Burger, E.: Towards a tool-oriented taxonomy of view-based modelling. In: Proceedings Modellierung 2012, Bamberg, pp. 59–74 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bork, D., Sinz, E.J.: Bridging the Gap from a Multi-View Modelling Method to the Design of a Multi-View Modelling Tool. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures 8(2), 25–41 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Persson, M., Törngren, M., Qamar, A., Westman, J., Biehl, M., Tripakis, S., Vangheluwe, H., Denil, J.: A characterization of integrated multi-view modeling in the context of embedded and cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software, pp. 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masuda, H., Utz, W., Hara, Y.: Development of an evaluation approach for customer service interaction models. In: Buchmann, R., Kifor, C.V., Yu, J. (eds.) KSEM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8793, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fill, H.-G.: On the social network based semantic annotation of conceptual models. In: Buchmann, R., Kifor, C.V., Yu, J. (eds.) KSEM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8793, pp. 138–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Bork, D., Karagiannis, D.: Model-driven development of multi-view modelling methods: the MuVieMoT approach. In: Holzinger, Cardoso, Cordeiro, van Sinderen, Mellor (eds.) International Conference on Software Paradigm Trends, pp. 11–23 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bork, D., Fill, H.-G.: Formal aspects of enterprise modeling methods: a comparison framework. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3400–3409 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bork, D.: Using conceptual modeling for designing multi-view modeling tools. In: 21st Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Bork .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bork, D., Buchmann, R., Karagiannis, D. (2015). Preserving Multi-view Consistency in Diagrammatic Knowledge Representation. In: Zhang, S., Wirsing, M., Zhang, Z. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9403. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25159-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25159-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25158-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25159-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics