Skip to main content

Understanding Socialization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Autonomous Child

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research ((BRIEFSWELLBEING))

Abstract

This chapter seeks to synthesize the perspectives and studies within the various disciplines. Returning to the first chapter and the dimensions of socialisation, emancipation is underlined as a basic purpose of modern socialisation. The driving force of socialisation is understood as the desire for recognition in all its forms, ranging from success in career and heroism to love and friendship, which the social subject seeks to realise within his or her symbolic order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wittgenstein’s early statement “Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen” (Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent), is contrary to the position of language in socialization.

  2. 2.

    The concept of “standard packages” refers to norms indicating a proper level of consumption and an acceptable life style.

  3. 3.

    (“Selvet er et Forhold, der forholder sig til sig selv, eller er det i Forholdet, at Forholdet forholder sig til sig selv; Selvet er ikke Forholdet, men at Forholdet forholder sig til sig selv”)

References

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, S. (2007). Altercentric infants and adults: On the origins and manifestations of participant perception of others’ acts and utterances. In S. Braaten (Ed.), On being moved; from mirror neurons to empathy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Figuer, C., Gonzalez, M., & Malo, S. (2007). The values adolescents aspire to, their well-being and the values parents aspire to for their children. Social Indicators Research, 84(3), 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Coenders, G., Gonáles, M., Malo, S., Bertran, I., & Figuer, C. (2012). Testing the relationship between parents’ and their children’s subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1031–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, D. C., & Conrad, J. (2001). School dropout as predicted by peer rejection and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(3), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1994). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur und andere kulturtheoretische Schriften. Fischer Klassik. http://www.textlog.de/sigmund-freud-unbehagen-kultur.html. Accessed July 2, 2015.

  • Fromm, E. (1976). To have or to be? London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frostad, P., Pijl, J., & Mjaavatn, P. (2015). Losing all interest in school: Social participation as a predictor of the intention to leave upper secondary school early. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frønes, I. (1995). Among peers. Oslo, Stockholm: Scandinavian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. (2003). ‪Transgression. London: Taylor & Francis‬.‬‬‬‬

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (2011). Sygdommen til Døden. København: Det Lille Forlag. English edition: Kierkegaard, S. (1983). The sickness unto death. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. (2011). Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2010). Language not mysterious? In B. Weiss & J. Wanderer (Eds.), Reading brandom on making it explicit. NewYork: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living (p. 1979). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivar Frønes .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frønes, I. (2016). Understanding Socialization. In: The Autonomous Child. SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25100-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25100-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25098-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25100-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics