Advertisement

Socialization as Biological-Social Interaction

  • Ivar FrønesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research book series (BRIEFSWELLBEING)

Abstract

Socialization is a social process with strong biological components that interact with social and cultural frameworks and factors. The chapter illustrates the interplay of social and genetic factors, referring to studies that underline that babies are biologically designed for moving into communities of signs, as well as to meta-perspectives on the relationship between evolution and culture.

Keywords

Genetic biological interaction Evolution Vulnerability 

References

  1. Bateson, M. C. (1979). The epigenesis of conversational interaction: A personal account of research development. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of human communication (pp. 63–77). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Belsky, J., Houts, R. M., & Fearon, R. M. P. (2010). Infant attachment security and the timing of puberty: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 21(9), 1195–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørnebekk, G. (2007). Dispositions related to sensitivity in the neurological basis for activation of approach-avoidance motivation, antisocial attributes and individual differences in aggressive behavior. Social Behaviorist and Personality, 35(9), 1251–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bråten, S. (1998). Infant learning by altercentric participation: The reverse of egocentric observation in autism. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bråten, S. (2007). Altercentric infants and adults: On the origins and manifestations of participant perception of others’ acts and utterances. In S. Bråten (Ed.), On being moved. From mirror neurons to empathy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Bråten, S. (2009). The intersubjective mirror in infant learning and evolution of speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brook, A., & Ross, D. (2002). Daniel dennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J., Jolly, A., & Sylva, K. (Eds.). (1976). Play: Its role in development and evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Caplan, A. (Ed.). (1978). The sociobiology debate: Readings on ethical and scientific issues. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297(5582), 851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. (2006). Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: Joining forces with neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(7), 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caspi, A., Wright, B. R. R., Moffitt, T. R., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Early failure in the labor market: Childhood and adolescent predictors of unemployment in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 63, 424–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Conley, D., Strully, K. W., & Bennett, N. G. (2003). The starting gate: Birth weight and life chances. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  16. Deary, I. J., Taylor, M. D., Hart, C. L., Wilson, V., Smith, G. D., Blane, D., & Starr, J. M. (2005). Intergenerational social mobility and mid-life status attainment: Influences of childhood intelligence, childhood social factors, and education. Intelligence, 33(5), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennett, D. (2004). Freedom evolves. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Dodge, K. (2008). Practice and public policy in the area of gene-environment interactions. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Genetic effects on environmental vulnerability and disease (pp. 87–97). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Feinstein, L. (2003). Inequality in the early cognitive development of British children in the 1970 cohort. Economica, 70(277), 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frønes, I. (1995). Among peers. Oslo, Stockholm: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Frønes, I. (2007). On theories of dialogue, self and society: Redefining socialization and the acquisition of meaning in light of the intersubjective matrix. In S. Bråten (Ed.), On being moved. From mirror neurons to empathy (pp. 201–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  22. Gottesman, I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14(6), 623–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groos, K. (1898) The play of animals (New York 1898) https://archive.org/details/playanimals00baldgoog.
  24. Habermas, J. (2007). The language game of responsible agency and the problem of free will: How can epistemic dualism be reconciled with ontological monism? Philosophical Explorations, 10(1), 13–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanson, J. L., Hair, N., Shen, D. G., Shi, F., Gilmore, J. H., Wolfe, B. L., et al. (2013). Family poverty affects the rate of human infant brain growth. PLoS ONE, 8, e80954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080954 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0080954#references. Accessed July 2, 2015.
  26. Harlow, H. F. (1962). Affectional systems of monkeys, involving relations between mothers and young. In International Symposium on Comparative Medicine Proceedings (pp. 6–10). New York: Eaton Laboratories.Google Scholar
  27. Haworth, C. M. A., Asbury, K., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2011). Added value measures in education show genetic as well as environmental influence. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hetherington, M., Reiss, D., & Plomin, R. (1994). Separate social worlds of siblings: The impact of non-shared environment on development. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Kaler, S. R., & Freeman, B. J. (1994). Analysis of environmental deprivation: Cognitive and social development in Romanian orphans. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(4), 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kishiyama, M. M., Boyce, W. T., Jimenez, A. M., Perry, L. M., & Knight, R. T. (2009). Socioeconomic disparities Affect prefrontal function in children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(6), 1106–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lombardo, M., Barnes, J., Wheelwright, S., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Self-referential cognition and empathy in autism. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000883 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000883. Accessed July 2, 2015.
  32. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moffitt, T. E. (2006). MAOA, maltreatment, and gene-environment interaction predicting children’s mental health: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry, 11(10), 903–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Montessori, M. (1949). The absorbent mind. Free download https://archive.org/details/absorbentmind031961mbp. Accessed July 2, 2015.
  35. Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from each other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rutter, M., Beckett, C., Castle, J., Colvert, E., Kreppner, J., Mehta, M., et al. (2007). Effects of profound early institutional deprivation: An overview of findings from a UK longitudinal study of Romanian adoptees. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 332–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sahlins, M. (2004). Stone age economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Silberman, S. (2001). The geek syndrome. Wired. Issue 9.12 http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aspergers.html. Accessed July 2, 2015.
  40. Tiger, L., & Fox, R. (1978). The human biogram. In A. L. Caplan (Ed.), The sociobiology debate (pp. 57–63). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  41. Trevarthen, C. B. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Before Speech (Ed.), Bullowa, M (pp. 321–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Trevarthen, C. B. (2011). What is it like to be a person who knows nothing? Defining the active intersubjective mind of a newborn human being Infant and child development special issue: The intersubjective newborn, 20(1), 119–135.Google Scholar
  43. Turkheimer, E., Haley, A. P., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14(6), 623–628.Google Scholar
  44. Turkheimer, E., & Waldron, M. C. (2000). Non-shared environment: A theoretical, methodological and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vicedo, M. (2010). The evolution of Harry Harlow: From the nature to the nurture of love. History of Psychiatry, 21(2), 1–16 http://individual.utoronto.ca/vicedo/vicedoca/Publications_files/Vicedo_HofP.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2015.
  46. von Stumm, S., Macintyre, S., Batty, D. G., Clark, H., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Intelligence, social class of origin, childhood behavior disturbance and education as predictors of status attainment in midlife in men: The Aberdeen Children of the 1950s study. Intelligence, 38(1), 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waldfogel, J., & Washbrook, E. (2010). Low income and early cognitive development in the U.K. A Report for the Sutton Trust February 2010. http://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Sutton_Trust_Cognitive_Report.pdf.
  48. Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, E. (1978). The biology of sociobiology. In Caplan. A. L. (Ed.), The sociobiology debate. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Depart of Sociology and Human GeogrUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations