Analysing Stakeholder Driven Scenarios with a Transboundary Water Planning Tool for IWRM in the Jordan River Basin
Although IWRM has become the mainstream concept for water management, its implementation in transboundary, politically tense settings, such as the Jordan River basin, is still limited. In this study we present the application of a transboundary spatially explicit water resources simulation and planning tool in support of decision making in this contentious setting. We integrated socio-economic scenarios and water management strategies resulting from a stakeholder process, thereby including socio-economic uncertainty, using the WEAP modelling software. Tool development was supported by an active transboundary dialogue between scientists and stakeholders. The tool was used to identify water scarcity effects and spatial-temporal response patterns under four regional scenarios up to the year 2050. These scenarios suggested that the positive effects of large scale water management options such as sea water desalination and the increased use of treated wastewater can be strongly limited by insufficient water transport infrastructure and/or a lack of cooperation. Respective responses to water scarcity should be pursued with the same intensity as currently the implementation of large scale supply-side options.
KeywordsIWRM WEAP Water resource planning Scenario analysis Jordan River basin
The study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF) within the GLOWA Jordan River Project. Our gratitude also goes to our colleagues from all GLOWA Jordan River sub-projects for their contributions.
- Abu Sadah M (2009) Application of WEAP-MODFLOW in the Western Aquifer Basin, Palestine. In: Paper presented at the First Arab WEAP conference, Damascus, Syria, 25–27 May 2009Google Scholar
- Alcamo J (2008) The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. In: Alcamo J (ed) Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis. Developments in integrated environmental assessment, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 123–150. doi: 10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00406-7
- Alfarra A, Kamp-Benedict E, Hötzl H, Sader N, Sonneveld B (2012) Modeling water supply and demand for effective water management allocation in the Jordan Valley. J Agric Sci Appl 1(1):1–7. doi: 10.14511/jasa.2227.6475
- Bonzi C, Hoff H, Stork J, Subah A, Wolf L, Tielbörger K (2010) WEAP for IWRM in the Jordan River region; bridging between scientific complexity and application. In: Integrated water resources management, Karlsruhe, 24–25 Nov 2010, pp 397–403Google Scholar
- Brooks D, Trottier J (2010) A modern agreement to share water between Israelis and Palestinians. The Friends of the Earth (FoEME) Proposal. FOEME. Amman, Jordan. www.foeme.org/www/?module=publications&project_id=54
- EXACT (ed) (1998) Overview of middle east water resources: water resources of Palestinian, Jordanian and Isrealie interest. Executive Action Team MEDBPE. http://exact-me.org/
- Israel-Jordan (1994) Treaty of peace between the state of Israel the Hasemite Kingdom of Jordan; Water related matters. ANNEX II, 1a/1b, AllocationGoogle Scholar
- Jayyousi AF, Almasri MN (2010) The use of water allocation models in managing trans-boundary water resources: a case from Palestine. In: Paper presented at the international conference “transboundary aquifers: challenges and new directions”(ISARM 2010), Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- SEI (ongoing) Webpage: the water evaluation and planning system (WEAP). Stockholm Environmental Institute. www.weap21.org
- Sivan I, Salingar Y, Rimmer A (2007) A WEAP model for the Sea of Galilee (Lake Kinneret) Basin—water resources and consumers by sub-basins. Water Eng 53:50–58Google Scholar
- United Nations DoEaSA, Population Division (2013) World population prospects: the 2012 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper ESA/P/WP.227Google Scholar