Advertisement

State-and-Transition Models: Conceptual Versus Simulation Perspectives, Usefulness and Breadth of Use, and Land Management Applications

  • Louis ProvencherEmail author
  • Leonardo Frid
  • Christina Czembor
  • Jeffrey T. Morisette
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Abstract

State-and-Transition Simulation Modeling (STSM) is a quantitative analysis method that can consolidate a wide array of resource management issues under a “what-if” scenario exercise. STSM can be seen as an ensemble of models, such as climate models, ecological models, and economic models that incorporate human dimensions and management options. This chapter presents STSM as a tool to help synthesize information on social–ecological systems and to investigate some of the management issues associated with exotic annual Bromus species, which have been described elsewhere in this book. Definitions, terminology, and perspectives on conceptual and computer-simulated stochastic state-and-transition models are given first, followed by a brief review of past STSM studies relevant to the management of Bromus species. A detailed case study illustrates the usefulness of STSM for land management. As a whole, this chapter is intended to demonstrate how STSM can help both managers and scientists: (a) determine efficient resource allocation for monitoring nonnative grasses; (b) evaluate sources of uncertainty in model simulation results involving expert opinion, and their consequences for management decisions; and (c) provide insight into the consequences of predicted local climate change effects on ecological systems invaded by exotic annual Bromus species.

Keywords

State-and-transition Conceptual model Simulation Uncertainty Climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

References

  1. Abatzoglou JT, Kolden CA (2011) Climate change in western US deserts: potential for increased wildfire and invasive annual grasses. Rangel Ecol Manag 64(5):471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagchi S, Briske DD, Bestelmeyer BT et al (2013) Assessing resilience and state-transition models with historical records of cheatgrass Bromus tectorum invasion in North American sagebrush-steppe. J Appl Ecol 50(5):1131–1141Google Scholar
  3. Barrett T (2001) Models of vegetation change for landscape planning: a comparison of FETM, LANDSUM, SIMPPLLE, and VDDT. Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-76-WWW. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, p 14Google Scholar
  4. Bestelmeyer BT, Herrick JE, Brown JR et al (2004) Land management in the American Southwest: a state-and-transition approach to ecosystem complexity. Environ Manag 34(1):38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blankenship K, Smith J, Swaty R et al (2012) Modeling on the grand scale: LANDFIRE lessons learned. In: Kerns B, Shlisky AJ, Daniel CJ (eds) First landscape state-and-transition simulation modeling conference, 14–16 June 2011. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-869. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, pp 43–56Google Scholar
  6. Blankenship K, Provencher L, Frid L et al (2013) Human dimensions of state-and-transition simulation model applications to support decisions in wildland fire management. In: Proceedings of 3rd Human Dimensions of Wildland Fire Conference, Seattle, WA, 17–19 April 2012. International Association of Wildland Fire, Missoula, MT, pp 28–33Google Scholar
  7. Bradley BA (2009a) Regional analysis of the impacts of climate change on cheatgrass invasion shows potential risk and opportunity. Glob Change Biol 15(1):196–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley BA (2009b) Assessing ecosystem threats from global and regional change: hierarchical modeling of risk to sagebrush ecosystems from climate change, land use and invasive species in Nevada, USA. Ecography 33(1):198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley BA, Curtis CA, Chambers JC (2015) Bromus response to climate and projected changes with climate change. In: Germino MJ, Chambers JC, Brown CS (eds) Exotic brome-grasses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems of the Western US: causes, consequences and management implications. Springer, New York, NY (Chapter 9)Google Scholar
  10. Briske DD, Bestelmeyer BT, Stringham TK et al (2008) Recommendations for development of resilience-based state-and-transition models. Rangel Ecol Manag 61(4):359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown TJ, Hall BL, Westerling AL (2004) The impact of twenty-first century climate change on wildland fire danger in the western United States: an applications perspective. Clim Change 62(1–3):365–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caudle D, DiBenedetto J, Karl M, Sanchez H, Talbot C (2013) Interagency ecological site handbook for rangelands. http://jornada.nmsu.edu/files/InteragencyEcolSiteHandbook.pdf. Accessed 2 Jun 2015
  13. Chambers J (2008) Invasive plant species and the Great Basin. In: Chambers J, Devoe N, Evenden A (eds) Collaborative management and research in the Great Basin – examining the issues and developing a framework for action. Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-204. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp 38–41Google Scholar
  14. Chambers JC, Miller RF, Board DI et al (2014) Resilience and resistance of sagebrush ecosystems: implications for state and transition models and management treatments. Rangel Ecol Manag 67(5):440–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Creutzburg MK, Halofsky JE, Halofsky JS et al (2014) Climate change and land management in the rangelands of central Oregon. Environ Manag 55:1–13Google Scholar
  16. Creutzburg MK, Halofsky JS, Hemstrom MA (2012) Using state-and-transition models to project cheatgrass and juniper invasion in southeastern Oregon sagebrush steppe. In: Kerns BK, Shlisky AJ, Daniel CJ (eds) First landscape state-and-transition simulation modeling conference, 14–16 June 2011. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, pp 73–84Google Scholar
  17. Czembor CA, Morris WK, Wintle BA et al (2011) Quantifying variance components in ecological models based on expert opinion. J Appl Ecol 48(3):736–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Czembor CA, Vesk PA (2009) Incorporating between-expert uncertainty into state-and-transition simulation models for forest restoration. Forest Ecol Manag 259(2):165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel CJ, Frid L (2012) Predicting landscape vegetation dynamics using state-and-transition simulation models. In: Kerns B, Shlisky AJ, Daniel CJ (eds) First landscape state-and-transition simulation modeling conference, 14–16 June 2011. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-869. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR, pp 5–22Google Scholar
  20. ESSA Technologies Ltd. (2007) Vegetation dynamics development tool user guide, Version 6.0. ESSA Technologies Ltd, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  21. Evers L, Miller RF, Hemstrom M et al (2011) Estimating historical sage-grouse habitat abundance using a state-and-transition model. Nat Resour Environ Iss 17(1):115–129Google Scholar
  22. Evers LB, Miller RF, Doescher PS et al (2013) Simulating current successional trajectories in sagebrush ecosystems with multiple disturbances using a state-and-transition modeling framework. Rangel Ecol Manag 66(3):313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faraway JJ (2006) Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  24. Forbis TA, Provencher L, Frid L et al (2006) Great Basin land management planning using ecological modeling. Environ Manag 38(1):62–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frid L, Hanna D, Korb N et al (2013a) Evaluating alternative weed management strategies for three Montana landscapes. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6(1):48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frid L, Holcombe T, Morisette JT et al (2013b) Using state-and-transition modeling to account for imperfect detection in invasive species management. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6(1):36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frid L, Wilmshurst JF (2009) Decision analysis to evaluate control strategies for crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) in Grasslands National Park of Canada. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 2(4):324–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Grant CD (2006) State-and-transition successional model for bauxite mining rehabilitation in the Jarrah forest of western Australia. Restor Ecol 14(1):28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halofsky JE, Hemstrom MA, Conklin DR et al (2013) Assessing potential climate change effects on vegetation using a linked model approach. Ecol Model 266:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hann WJ, Bunnell DL (2001) Fire and land management planning and implementation across multiple scales. Int J Wildl Fire 10(3–4):389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hardesty J, Adams J, Gordon D et al (2000) Simulating management with models: lessons from ten years of ecosystem management at Eglin Air Force Base. Conserv Pract 1(1):26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayes MJ, Svoboda MD, Wilhite DA et al (1999) Monitoring the 1996 drought using the standardized precipitation index. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 80(3):429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heddinghaus T, Sabol P (1991) A review of the Palmer drought severity index and where do we go from here? 7th Conference on Applied Climatology, Salt Lake City, UT, 10–13 September 1991. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, pp 242–246Google Scholar
  35. Hemstrom M, Ager AA, Vavra M et al (2004) A state and transition approach for integrating models. In: Hayes J, Ager AA, Barbour RJ (eds) Methods for integrated modeling of landscape change: interior northwest landscape analysis system. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-610. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, p 218Google Scholar
  36. Horn HS (1975) Markovian properties of forest successions. In: Cody M, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and the evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 196–211Google Scholar
  37. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson CJ, Gillingham MP (2004) Mapping uncertainty: sensitivity of wildlife habitat ratings to expert opinion. J Appl Ecol 41(6):1032–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keane RE, Cary GJ, Davies ID et al (2004) A classification of landscape fire succession models: spatial simulations of fire and vegetation dynamics. Ecol Model 179(1):3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelly AE, Goulden ML (2008) Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(33):11823–11826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knapp CN, Fernandez-Gimenez M, Kachergis E et al (2011a) Using participatory workshops to integrate state-and-transition models created with local knowledge and ecological data. Rangel Ecol Manag 64(2):158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knapp CN, Fernandez-Gimenez ME, Briske DD et al (2011b) An assessment of state-and-transition models: perceptions following two decades of development and implementation. Rangel Ecol Manag 64(6):598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knapp PA (1996) Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) dominance in the Great Basin Desert – History, persistence, and influences to human activities. Glob Environ Change 6(1):37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kurz WA, Beukema SJ, Klenner W et al (2000) TELSA: the tool for exploratory landscape scenario analyses. Comput Electron Agric 27(1–3):227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL et al (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in western U. S. ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecol Appl 19(4):1003–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Low G, Provencher L, Abele S (2010) Enhanced conservation action planning: assessing landscape condition and predicting benefits of conservation strategies. J Conserv Plan 6:36–60Google Scholar
  47. Maxwell BD, Lehnhoff E, Rew LJ (2009) The rationale for monitoring invasive plant populations as a crucial step for management. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 2(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCarthy M (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Merzenich J, Kurz WA, Beukema SJ et al (1999) Long-range modeling of stochastic disturbances and management treatments using VDDT and TELSA. Society of American Foresters National Convention: Landscape Analysis session, Portland, OR, 14 September 1999Google Scholar
  50. Miller C (2007) Simulation of the consequences of different fire regimes to support wildland fire use decisions. Fire Ecol 3:83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Monsen S, Stevens R, Shaw NL (2004) Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-136-vol. 1. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp 89–100Google Scholar
  52. Moody ME, Mack RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions – the importance of nascent foci. J Appl Ecol 25(3):1009–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (1969) Enacted by the senate and house of representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled: as amended, Pub. L. 91–190, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4347, 1 Jan 1970, as amended by Pub. L. 94–52, 3 Jul 1975, Pub. L. 94–83, 9 Aug 1975, and Pub. L. 97–258, § 4(b), 13 Sept 1982Google Scholar
  54. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (1998) National Forestry Manual. USDA. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_050983.pdf. Accessed 2 Jun 2015
  55. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2003) National Range and Pasture Handbook, revision 1. USDA, Grazing Lands Technology Institute. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/landuse/rangepasture/. Accessed 2 Jun 2015
  56. Nixon K, Silbernagel J, Price J et al (2014) Habitat availability for multiple avian species under modeled alternative conservation scenarios in the Two Hearted River watershed in Michigan, USA. J Nat Conserv 22(4):302–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD (2004) Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 – do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol 162(2):253–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olsson AD, Betancourt JL, Crimmins MA et al (2012) Constancy of local spread rates for buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare L.) in the Arizona Upland of the Sonoran Desert. J Arid Environ 87:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. Research Paper No 45. US Department of Commerce, Office of Climatology, Weather Bureau Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Pennisi E (2010) Western US forests suffer death by degrees. Science 323(5913):447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52(3):273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Price J, Silbernagel J, Miller N et al (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios. Ecol Model 229:76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Provencher L, Anderson T, Low G et al (2013) Landscape conservation forecasting™ for Great Basin National Park. Park Sci 30:56–67Google Scholar
  64. Provencher L, Forbis TA, Frid L et al (2007) Comparing alternative management strategies of fire, grazing, and weed control using spatial modeling. Ecol Model 209(2–4):249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12(2):618–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rehfeldt GE, Crookston NL, Warwell MV et al (2006) Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. Int J Plant Sci 167(6):1123–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rollins MG (2009) LANDFIRE: A nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. Int J Wildl Fire 18(3):235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rumpff L, Duncan DH, Vesk PA et al (2011) State-and-transition modelling for adaptive management of native woodlands. Biol Conserv 144(4):1224–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR et al (2007) Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecol Model 201(3–4):409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith SD, Huxman TE, Zitzer SF et al (2000) Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408(6808):79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Speirs-Bridge A, Fidler F, McBride M et al (2010) Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Anal 30(3):512–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stringham TK, Krueger WC, Shaver PL (2003) State and transition modeling: an ecological process approach. J Range Manag 56(2):106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tausch R, Nowak RS (1999) Fifty years of ecotone change between shrub and tree dominance in the Jack Springs pinyon research natural area. In: McArthur E, Ostler WK, Wambodt CL (eds) Shrubland Ecotones, Ephraim, UT. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp 71–77Google Scholar
  75. Taylor AH, Beaty RM (2005) Climatic influences on fire regimes in the northern Sierra Nevada Mountains, Lake Tahoe Basin, Nevada, USA. J Biogeogr 32(3):425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thacker ET, Ralphs MH, Call CA et al (2008) Invasion of broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) following disturbance: evaluating change in a state-and-transition model. Rangel Ecol Manag 61(3):263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Twidwell D, Allred BW, Fuhlendorf SD (2013) National-scale assessment of ecological content in the world’s largest land management framework. Ecosphere 4(8):94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vavra M, Hemstrom MA, Wisdom M (2007) Modeling the effects of herbivores on the abundance of forest overstory states using a state-transition approach in the upper Grande Ronde River Basin, Oregon, USA. Landscape Urban Plan 80(3):212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Westerling A (2009) Climate change impacts on wildfire. In: Schneider M, Rosencranz A, Mastrandrea MD et al (eds) Climate change science and policy. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  80. Westerling AL, Bryant BP (2008) Climate change and wildfire in California. Clim Change 87:S231–S249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Westoby M, Walker B, Noy-Meir I (1989) Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manag 42:266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Provencher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Leonardo Frid
    • 2
  • Christina Czembor
    • 3
  • Jeffrey T. Morisette
    • 4
  1. 1.The Nature ConservancyRenoUSA
  2. 2.Apex Resource Management Solutions Ltd.Bowen IslandCanada
  3. 3.Knight Piésold Ltd.VancouverCanada
  4. 4.US Geological SurveyNorth Central Climate Science CenterFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations