Symbiotic Interaction and the Experience of Agency

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9359)

Abstract

The sense of agency is the experience of initiating our actions in order to control the external environment. This paper explores the notion of the self and agency in the context of symbiotic computing. Symbiotic computer systems use sensors to detect psychophysiological markers and implicitly interpret our intentions in order to enhance our actions in some way. Maintaining agency independence between the user and the system is central to the symbiotic relationship. Also it is ideal to enhance the user’s interaction without subducting control and therefore it is pertinent to consider the sense of agency during symbiotic interactions. This paper will theoretically explore the notion of self-agency in a symbiotic setting, drawing on relevant research into the sense of agency in psychology and neuroscience.

Keywords

Sense of agency Symbiotic systems Human computer interaction User experience Physiological interaction Agency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 4th edn. Pearson Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fairclough, S.H.: Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting with Computers 21(1), 133–145 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Freeman, J., Gamberini, L.: Symbiotic interaction: a critical definition and comparison to other human-computer paradigms. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 3–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wegner, D., Wheatley, T.: Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 54(7), 480 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blakemore, S., Wolpert, D., Frith, C.: Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 237–242 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wegner, D.M., Sparrow, B.: Authorship processing. In: Gazzaniga, M. (ed.) The Cognitive Neurosciences III, pp. 1201–1209. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wegner, D., Sparrow, B., Winerman, L.: Vicarious agency: experiencing control over the movements of others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 838–848 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore, J.W., Wegner, D.M., Haggard, P.: Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Conscious. Cogn. 18, 1056–1064 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moore, J., Fletcher, P.: Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 59–68 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haggard, P., Clark, S., Kalogeras, J.: Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 382–385 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Limerick, H., Coyle, D., Moore, J.W.: The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: a review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 643 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., Newen, A.: Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 219–239 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W., Pearl, D.K.: Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain 106(3), 623–642 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore, J.W., Obhi, S.S.: Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review. Consciousness and Cognition 21(1), 546–561 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coyle, D., Moore, J., Kristensson, P.O., Blackwell, A.F., Fletcher, P.C.: I did that! measuring users experience of agency in their own actions. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI, pp. 2025–2034 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion 30(4), 344–360 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farrer, C., Bouchereau, M., Jeannerod, M., Franck, N.: Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behav. Neurol. 19, 53–57 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berberian, B., Sarrazin, J.C., Le Blaye, P., Haggard, P.: Automation technology and sense of control: a window on human agency. PLoS One (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desantis, A., Roussel, C., Waszak, F.: On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 1211–1220 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Negri, P., Gamberini, L., Cutini, S.: A review of the research on subliminal techniques for implicit interaction in symbiotic systems. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 47–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frith, C.: The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hon, N., Poh, J.H., Soon, C.S.: Preoccupied minds feel less control: Sense of agency is modulated by cognitive load. Consciousness and Cognition 22(2), 556–561 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Demanet, J., Muhle-Karbe, P.S., Lynn, M.T., Blotenberg, I., Brass, M.: Power to the will: how exerting physical effort boosts the sense of agency. Cognition 129(3), 574–578 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah Limerick
    • 1
  • James W. Moore
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Coyle
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.University of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Goldsmiths, University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.University College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations