Addressing Israelis’ and Palestinians’ Basic Needs for Agency and Positive Moral Identity Facilitates Mutual Prosociality
According to Bar-Tal’s theorizing (Bar-Tal, Am Behav Sci 50:1430–1453, 2007; Bar-Tal, Intractable conflicts: Psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) societies involved in intractable conflicts develop a collective fear orientation which becomes embedded in these societies’ ethos. Due to this basic orientation, acute security threats are chronically salient and security turns into a central societal value. Based on Bar-Tal’s theorizing, we argue that even though, in general, groups are strongly motivated to maintain their positive moral identity (Leach et al., J Pers Soc Psychol 93:234–249, 2007) in contexts of intractable conflicts, this need becomes subjected to the conflicting groups’ need to feel agentic, secure, and protected. Put differently, groups’ need for strength, agency, and security is experienced as highly pressing and hence receives primacy over the need for positive moral identity.
Focusing on the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, we review empirical evidence that supports our argument, revealing that Jews’ need for strength overrode their need for positive moral identity in determining prosocial behavioral tendencies toward Palestinians (SimanTov-Nachlieli and Shnabel, Pers Soc Psychol Bull 40:301–314, 2014). Optimistically, however, an “agency affirmation” intervention that reminded Jews and Palestinians of their in-group’s strength, competence, and resiliency addressed their need to feel strong and protected and made them more attentive to moral considerations. This attentiveness, in turn, increased their prosocial behavioral tendencies toward each other. These findings suggest that the satisfaction of Israelis’ and Palestinians’ pressing need for agency can “defreeze” their rigid clinging to aggressive defensiveness and self-righteousness (Bar-Tal and Halperin, Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. In: D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 217–240). New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2011). Such “defreezing” can contribute to ending the cycle of destructive violence while promoting, instead, constructive behaviors and reconciliation.
KeywordsMoral Identity Suicide Bomber Israeli Defense Force Prosocial Tendency Intractable Conflict
- Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 217–240). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Frijda, N. H. (1994). The lextalionis: On vengeance. In S. H. M. Van Goozen, N. E. Van de Poll, & J. A. Sergeant (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (pp. 263–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: The instrumental and socio emotional paths and the need-based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Netanyahu: Boycott campaign is anti-Semitic. (2014, February 18). Middle East monitor Retrieved from https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/9817-netanyahu-boycott-campaign-is-anti-semetic.
- Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shnabel, N., & Noor, M. (2012). Competitive victimhood among Jewish and Palestinian Israelis reflects differential threats to their identities: The perspective of the needs-based model. In K. J. Jonas & T. Morton (Eds.), Restoring civil societies: the psychology of intervention and engagement following crisis (pp. 192–207). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Noor, M. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867–877.Google Scholar
- Shnabel, N., & SimanTov-Nachlieli, I. (2015). The power to be moral: Affirming Israelis’ and Palestinians’ agency promotes mutual prosocial tendencies. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., & Shnabel, N. (2014). Feeling both victim and perpetrator: Investigating duality within the needs-based model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 301–314.Google Scholar
- SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., & Shnabel, N. (2015). Agents of morality: Affirming conflicting groups’ agency promotes pro-sociality towards the conflicting outgroup. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Sonnenschein, N. (2008). An identity challanging dialoge. Haifa: Pardes Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar